Petroula Nana, Stéphan Haulon, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Thomas Le Houérou, Martina Bastianon, Angelos Karelis, Nuno Dias, Tilo Kölbel
{"title":"Fenestrated or Branched Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Outcomes in Female Patients: A Retrospective Multicentre Analysis.","authors":"Petroula Nana, Stéphan Haulon, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Thomas Le Houérou, Martina Bastianon, Angelos Karelis, Nuno Dias, Tilo Kölbel","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Data on females managed with fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic arch repair (f/b-Arch) are limited. This study aimed to present the 30 day and follow up outcomes of f/b-Arch in female patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis (1 January 2011 to 31 March 2024) among four European aortic centres was conducted according to STROBE guidelines. Consecutive female patients managed with custom made f/b-Arch devices (Cook Medical, Bloomington, In, USA) were eligible. Primary outcomes were technical success and death and stroke at 30 days. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed for follow up outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 148 females (mean age 71.8 ± 3.5 years; mean aortic diameter 61.9 ± 4.2 mm; 14.2% urgent; 5.4% ruptures). The aortic dissection rate was 38.5% (35.8% chronic; 2.7% acute). Distal f/b-Arch was performed in 23%. b-Arch was used in 68.9% and f-Arch in 27.7%, while 3.4% were managed with a left subclavian artery branch device. The non-native proximal aortic landing (nNPAL) rate was 60.1%. Technical success was 95.9%. Thirty day mortality was 8.1%, with respiratory failure (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21 - 0.50; p < .001) and pericardial effusion (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.43 - 0.82; p < .001) being independently related. The stroke rate was 10.1% (6.1% major; all ischaemic), with peripheral arterial disease as a predictor (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.39; p = .020), and nNPAL (OR -0.22, 95% CI -0.26 - -0.02; p = .030) and aortic dissection (OR -0.19, 95% CI -0.24 - -0.001; p = .040) as protectors. Urgent repair was not related to adverse events. The spinal cord ischaemia rate was 3.4%. At forty eight months (mean follow up 20.6 ± 9.4 months), survival was 79.5% (95% CI 74.7 - 84.3%), with stroke (hazard ratio (HR) 5.3, 95% CI 4.8 - 5.8; p = .002) and congestive heart failure (HR 6.1, 95% CI 5.5 - 6.6; p = .003) being related to lower survival. Freedom from unscheduled re-interventions was 53.9% (95% CI 44.5 - 63.3%) at forty eight months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female patients managed with f/b-Arch presented acceptable 30 day mortality. nNPAL and aortic dissection were independently related to lower stroke risk. Unscheduled re-interventions affected almost half of cases during follow up.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.03.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Data on females managed with fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic arch repair (f/b-Arch) are limited. This study aimed to present the 30 day and follow up outcomes of f/b-Arch in female patients.
Methods: A retrospective analysis (1 January 2011 to 31 March 2024) among four European aortic centres was conducted according to STROBE guidelines. Consecutive female patients managed with custom made f/b-Arch devices (Cook Medical, Bloomington, In, USA) were eligible. Primary outcomes were technical success and death and stroke at 30 days. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed for follow up outcomes.
Results: The study included 148 females (mean age 71.8 ± 3.5 years; mean aortic diameter 61.9 ± 4.2 mm; 14.2% urgent; 5.4% ruptures). The aortic dissection rate was 38.5% (35.8% chronic; 2.7% acute). Distal f/b-Arch was performed in 23%. b-Arch was used in 68.9% and f-Arch in 27.7%, while 3.4% were managed with a left subclavian artery branch device. The non-native proximal aortic landing (nNPAL) rate was 60.1%. Technical success was 95.9%. Thirty day mortality was 8.1%, with respiratory failure (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21 - 0.50; p < .001) and pericardial effusion (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.43 - 0.82; p < .001) being independently related. The stroke rate was 10.1% (6.1% major; all ischaemic), with peripheral arterial disease as a predictor (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.39; p = .020), and nNPAL (OR -0.22, 95% CI -0.26 - -0.02; p = .030) and aortic dissection (OR -0.19, 95% CI -0.24 - -0.001; p = .040) as protectors. Urgent repair was not related to adverse events. The spinal cord ischaemia rate was 3.4%. At forty eight months (mean follow up 20.6 ± 9.4 months), survival was 79.5% (95% CI 74.7 - 84.3%), with stroke (hazard ratio (HR) 5.3, 95% CI 4.8 - 5.8; p = .002) and congestive heart failure (HR 6.1, 95% CI 5.5 - 6.6; p = .003) being related to lower survival. Freedom from unscheduled re-interventions was 53.9% (95% CI 44.5 - 63.3%) at forty eight months.
Conclusion: Female patients managed with f/b-Arch presented acceptable 30 day mortality. nNPAL and aortic dissection were independently related to lower stroke risk. Unscheduled re-interventions affected almost half of cases during follow up.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles.
Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.