[Attitudes Toward Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: Indicators of Polarized Attitudes from a Representative German Sample].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Elisa Wandinger, Olaf Reis, Lena Lincke, Elmar Brähler, Steffen Weirich, Alexander Dück, Michael Kölch
{"title":"[Attitudes Toward Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: Indicators of Polarized Attitudes from a Representative German Sample].","authors":"Elisa Wandinger, Olaf Reis, Lena Lincke, Elmar Brähler, Steffen Weirich, Alexander Dück, Michael Kölch","doi":"10.1024/1422-4917/a001021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attitudes Toward Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: Indicators of Polarized Attitudes from a Representative German Sample <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Objective:</i> This study examined the attitudes of the German general population toward physical restraint (PR) and chemical restraint (CR) used in psychiatric settings to protect against self-endangerment and endangerment of others. <i>Method:</i> We analyzed attitudes toward coercive measures (CM) in a representative German sample (<i>N</i> = 2.485), exploring their distribution and association with sociodemographic factors using chi<sup>2</sup> tests and multinomial logistic regressions. <i>Results:</i> Two-thirds of subjects indicated acceptance of CR, whereas only 6 % approved PR. Rejection of CM was more common in people from West Germany (<b>χ</b><sup>2</sup>(3) = 33.396, <i>adj</i> <i>p</i> < .001, <b>φ</b> = .116), rural areas (<b>χ</b><sup>2</sup>(3) = 14.065, <i>adj p</i> = .018, <b>φ</b> = .057), and among individuals associated with right-wing political parties (<b>χ</b><sup>2</sup>(3) = 17.602, <i>adj p</i> = .008, <b>φ</b> = .105). <i>Conclusions:</i> 67 % of the sample accept coercive medication, while a quarter reject it, which illustrates the heterogeneity of attitudes and the need for more information and education. Despite the political tendency toward more coercive elements in psychiatric treatment, this contradicts the professional discourse, which is why a public survey could be useful in sharpening professional policy positions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54189,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Kinder-Und Jugendpsychiatrie Und Psychotherapie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Kinder-Und Jugendpsychiatrie Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1422-4917/a001021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attitudes Toward Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: Indicators of Polarized Attitudes from a Representative German Sample Abstract: Objective: This study examined the attitudes of the German general population toward physical restraint (PR) and chemical restraint (CR) used in psychiatric settings to protect against self-endangerment and endangerment of others. Method: We analyzed attitudes toward coercive measures (CM) in a representative German sample (N = 2.485), exploring their distribution and association with sociodemographic factors using chi2 tests and multinomial logistic regressions. Results: Two-thirds of subjects indicated acceptance of CR, whereas only 6 % approved PR. Rejection of CM was more common in people from West Germany (χ2(3) = 33.396, adj p < .001, φ = .116), rural areas (χ2(3) = 14.065, adj p = .018, φ = .057), and among individuals associated with right-wing political parties (χ2(3) = 17.602, adj p = .008, φ = .105). Conclusions: 67 % of the sample accept coercive medication, while a quarter reject it, which illustrates the heterogeneity of attitudes and the need for more information and education. Despite the political tendency toward more coercive elements in psychiatric treatment, this contradicts the professional discourse, which is why a public survey could be useful in sharpening professional policy positions.

[对精神病学强制措施的态度:来自德国代表性样本的两极分化态度指标]。
对精神病学中强制措施的态度:来自德国代表性样本的两极化态度指标 摘要:目的:本研究调查了德国普通民众对精神病院为防止自我危险和他人危险而使用的物理约束(PR)和化学约束(CR)的态度。研究方法:我们分析了具有代表性的德国样本(N = 2.485)对强制措施(CM)的态度,并使用 chi2 检验和多项式逻辑回归探讨了其分布情况以及与社会人口学因素的关联。结果显示三分之二的受试者表示接受 CR,而只有 6% 的受试者同意 PR。来自西德(χ2(3) = 33.396,adj p < .001,φ = .116)、农村地区(χ2(3) = 14.065,adj p = .018,φ = .057)和与右翼政党有关联的个人(χ2(3) = 17.602,adj p = .008,φ = .105)的人拒绝接受中医的比例更高。结论67%的样本接受强制用药,而四分之一的样本拒绝接受强制用药,这说明了人们态度的不一致性以及需要更多的信息和教育。尽管政治上倾向于在精神病治疗中加入更多强制元素,但这与专业人士的论述相矛盾,因此公众调查有助于明确专业人士的政策立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift veröffentlicht Originalarbeiten, Übersichtsreferate, Fallberichte, aktuelle Mitteilungen und Buchbesprechungen und informiert laufend über die Arbeit anderer internationaler Fachzeitschriften. Sie ist offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信