Review on biphasic blood drying method for rapid pathogen detection in bloodstream infections

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Jongwon Lim , Katherine Koprowski , Matthew Wester , Enrique Valera , Rashid Bashir
{"title":"Review on biphasic blood drying method for rapid pathogen detection in bloodstream infections","authors":"Jongwon Lim ,&nbsp;Katherine Koprowski ,&nbsp;Matthew Wester ,&nbsp;Enrique Valera ,&nbsp;Rashid Bashir","doi":"10.1016/j.slast.2025.100276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid and accurate detection of pathogenic microorganisms in blood is critical for diagnosing life-threatening conditions such as bloodstream infections (BSIs). Current methods for the detection and identification of bacteria from large volumes of blood (5 mL) involve culture steps followed by DNA extraction/purification/concentration and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-based nucleic acid amplification. DNA extraction and amplification directly from blood samples is hampered by the complexity of the blood matrix, resulting in time-consuming and labor-intensive processes. This review delves into recent advancements in molecular diagnostics based on blood drying, coined as ‘biphasic reaction’, and highlights this new technique that attempts to overcome the limitations of traditional sample preparation and amplification processes. The biphasic blood drying method, in combination with isothermal amplification methods such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) or recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), has recently been shown to improve the sensitivity of detection of bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens from ∼1 mL of whole blood, while minimizing DNA loss and avoiding the use of extraction/purification/concentration kits. Furthermore, the biphasic approach in combination with LAMP has been shown to be a culture-free method capable of detecting bacteria in clinical samples with a sensitivity of ∼1 CFU/mL in ∼2.5 h. This represents a significant reduction in detection and identification time compared to current clinical procedures based on bacterial culture prior to PCR amplification. This review paper aims to be a guide to identify new opportunities for future advancements and applications of the biphasic technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54248,"journal":{"name":"SLAS Technology","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLAS Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472630325000342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid and accurate detection of pathogenic microorganisms in blood is critical for diagnosing life-threatening conditions such as bloodstream infections (BSIs). Current methods for the detection and identification of bacteria from large volumes of blood (5 mL) involve culture steps followed by DNA extraction/purification/concentration and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-based nucleic acid amplification. DNA extraction and amplification directly from blood samples is hampered by the complexity of the blood matrix, resulting in time-consuming and labor-intensive processes. This review delves into recent advancements in molecular diagnostics based on blood drying, coined as ‘biphasic reaction’, and highlights this new technique that attempts to overcome the limitations of traditional sample preparation and amplification processes. The biphasic blood drying method, in combination with isothermal amplification methods such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) or recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), has recently been shown to improve the sensitivity of detection of bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens from ∼1 mL of whole blood, while minimizing DNA loss and avoiding the use of extraction/purification/concentration kits. Furthermore, the biphasic approach in combination with LAMP has been shown to be a culture-free method capable of detecting bacteria in clinical samples with a sensitivity of ∼1 CFU/mL in ∼2.5 h. This represents a significant reduction in detection and identification time compared to current clinical procedures based on bacterial culture prior to PCR amplification. This review paper aims to be a guide to identify new opportunities for future advancements and applications of the biphasic technology.
快速准确地检测血液中的病原微生物对于诊断危及生命的疾病(如血流感染 (BSI))至关重要。目前从大量血液(5 毫升)中检测和鉴定细菌的方法包括培养步骤,然后进行 DNA 提取/纯化/浓缩和基于聚合酶链式反应 (PCR) 的核酸扩增。直接从血液样本中提取和扩增 DNA 会受到血液基质复杂性的影响,导致整个过程耗时耗力。本综述深入探讨了基于血液干燥(被称为 "双相反应")的分子诊断技术的最新进展,并重点介绍了这项试图克服传统样本制备和扩增过程局限性的新技术。双相血液干燥法与等温扩增法(如环介导等温扩增法(LAMP)或重组酶聚合酶扩增法(RPA))相结合,最近已证明可提高从 1 毫升全血中检测细菌、病毒和真菌病原体的灵敏度,同时最大限度地减少 DNA 损失,避免使用提取/纯化/浓缩试剂盒。此外,双相法结合 LAMP 已被证明是一种无需培养的方法,能在 2.5 小时内检测临床样本中的细菌,灵敏度可达 1 CFU/mL。与目前先进行细菌培养再进行 PCR 扩增的临床程序相比,这大大缩短了检测和鉴定时间。本综述旨在为双相技术的未来发展和应用提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SLAS Technology
SLAS Technology Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
106 days
期刊介绍: SLAS Technology emphasizes scientific and technical advances that enable and improve life sciences research and development; drug-delivery; diagnostics; biomedical and molecular imaging; and personalized and precision medicine. This includes high-throughput and other laboratory automation technologies; micro/nanotechnologies; analytical, separation and quantitative techniques; synthetic chemistry and biology; informatics (data analysis, statistics, bio, genomic and chemoinformatics); and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信