{"title":"A Nomogram for Predicting Anastomotic Stricture after Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Yanhao Sun, Yilong Hu, Yuanfang Sun","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Anastomotic stricture is a common complication following laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, affecting up to 30% of patients and significantly impacting quality of life. This study aimed to develop a predictive model to identify high-risk patients and characterize stricture subtypes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Retrospective analysis of 304 patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer resection (August 2019-April 2024) identified independent risk factors through multivariate logistic regression. A nomogram was developed and validated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Subtype analysis compared Type I (dilatable, <i>n</i> = 51) and Type II (refractory, <i>n</i> = 38) strictures. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The nomogram incorporated five independent predictors: preoperative radiotherapy (odd ratio [OR] = 4.13), diverting stoma creation (OR = 6.98), lack of left colic artery preservation (OR = 3.95), anastomotic leakage (OR = 16.53), and anastomotic distance ≤3 cm (OR = 4.02), achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of .827. Type I strictures were significantly associated with diverting stoma creation (82.4% versus 39.5%, <i>P</i> = .004) and an anastomotic distance >3 cm (70.6% versus 36.8%, <i>P</i> = .001). The refined nomogram for Type II strictures demonstrated superior discrimination (AUC = .883, <i>P</i> < .001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This dual-phase nomogram effectively predicts overall anastomotic stricture risk and identifies refractory subtypes, enabling personalized postoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Anastomotic stricture is a common complication following laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, affecting up to 30% of patients and significantly impacting quality of life. This study aimed to develop a predictive model to identify high-risk patients and characterize stricture subtypes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 304 patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer resection (August 2019-April 2024) identified independent risk factors through multivariate logistic regression. A nomogram was developed and validated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Subtype analysis compared Type I (dilatable, n = 51) and Type II (refractory, n = 38) strictures. Results: The nomogram incorporated five independent predictors: preoperative radiotherapy (odd ratio [OR] = 4.13), diverting stoma creation (OR = 6.98), lack of left colic artery preservation (OR = 3.95), anastomotic leakage (OR = 16.53), and anastomotic distance ≤3 cm (OR = 4.02), achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of .827. Type I strictures were significantly associated with diverting stoma creation (82.4% versus 39.5%, P = .004) and an anastomotic distance >3 cm (70.6% versus 36.8%, P = .001). The refined nomogram for Type II strictures demonstrated superior discrimination (AUC = .883, P < .001). Conclusion: This dual-phase nomogram effectively predicts overall anastomotic stricture risk and identifies refractory subtypes, enabling personalized postoperative management.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.