High-Tensile Strength Suture Materials in Orthopaedics.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
JBJS Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00193
Naga Suresh Cheppalli, Sreenivasulu Metikala, Prabhudev Prasad Purudappa, Geneva Tranchida, Daniel C Washer
{"title":"High-Tensile Strength Suture Materials in Orthopaedics.","authors":"Naga Suresh Cheppalli, Sreenivasulu Metikala, Prabhudev Prasad Purudappa, Geneva Tranchida, Daniel C Washer","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>» High-tensile strength suture materials (HTSSMs) have significantly advanced the field of orthopaedic surgery by providing superior strength, enhanced handling characteristics, and improved durability compared with first-generation sutures.» These sutures are critical for ensuring repair integrity during the healing process of tendon-to-bone or tendon-to-tendon constructs.» While second-generation HTSSMs such as FiberWire, Orthocord, and Force Fiber offer higher tensile strength, better knot security, and reduced creep, their mechanical and biological properties vary, making it essential for surgeons to tailor their choice based on the tissue type, surgical technique, and patient-specific factors.» The incorporation of advanced materials such as ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and innovative designs such as core-plus-braid configurations has further minimized risks of failure from abrasion, knot slippage, or tissue cut through.» Despite these advancements, challenges such as potential tissue irritation, granuloma formation, and suture cutout remain. Selecting the appropriate HTSSM involves balancing mechanical strength with handling properties and biological responses.» Flat sutures distribute load more evenly and are less prone to tissue cutout, making them ideal for delicate tissues, while round sutures offer better abrasion resistance in high-stress repairs.» In addition, understanding key properties such as stiffness, creep, and knot security can help optimize outcomes and minimize complications.» Surgeons should remain vigilant about the trade-offs associated with material coatings and knot volume, as these factors can influence both repair success and postoperative tissue health.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

» High-tensile strength suture materials (HTSSMs) have significantly advanced the field of orthopaedic surgery by providing superior strength, enhanced handling characteristics, and improved durability compared with first-generation sutures.» These sutures are critical for ensuring repair integrity during the healing process of tendon-to-bone or tendon-to-tendon constructs.» While second-generation HTSSMs such as FiberWire, Orthocord, and Force Fiber offer higher tensile strength, better knot security, and reduced creep, their mechanical and biological properties vary, making it essential for surgeons to tailor their choice based on the tissue type, surgical technique, and patient-specific factors.» The incorporation of advanced materials such as ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and innovative designs such as core-plus-braid configurations has further minimized risks of failure from abrasion, knot slippage, or tissue cut through.» Despite these advancements, challenges such as potential tissue irritation, granuloma formation, and suture cutout remain. Selecting the appropriate HTSSM involves balancing mechanical strength with handling properties and biological responses.» Flat sutures distribute load more evenly and are less prone to tissue cutout, making them ideal for delicate tissues, while round sutures offer better abrasion resistance in high-stress repairs.» In addition, understanding key properties such as stiffness, creep, and knot security can help optimize outcomes and minimize complications.» Surgeons should remain vigilant about the trade-offs associated with material coatings and knot volume, as these factors can influence both repair success and postoperative tissue health.

"与第一代缝合线相比,高拉伸强度缝合材料(HTSSM)具有更高的强度、更强的操作特性和更佳的耐用性,从而极大地推动了矫形外科领域的发展"。这些缝合线对于确保肌腱对骨或肌腱对肌腱构造愈合过程中的修复完整性至关重要"。虽然 FiberWire、Orthocord 和 Force Fiber 等第二代 HTSSM 具有更高的拉伸强度、更好的打结安全性和更低的蠕变性,但它们的机械和生物特性各不相同,因此外科医生必须根据组织类型、手术技术和患者的具体因素进行选择。先进材料(如超高分子量聚乙烯)和创新设计(如核心加编织带配置)的采用进一步降低了因磨损、绳结滑动或组织切穿而导致失败的风险。尽管取得了这些进步,但潜在的组织刺激、肉芽肿形成和缝线切断等挑战依然存在。选择合适的 HTSSM 需要在机械强度、处理特性和生物反应之间取得平衡"。扁平缝合线能更均匀地分配负荷,不易出现组织切口,因此非常适合娇嫩组织,而圆形缝合线在高应力修复中具有更好的耐磨性。此外,了解硬度、蠕变和打结安全性等关键特性有助于优化治疗效果和减少并发症"。外科医生应该对与材料涂层和线结数量相关的权衡保持警惕,因为这些因素会影响修复的成功率和术后组织的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Reviews
JBJS Reviews SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: JBJS Reviews is an innovative review journal from the publishers of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. This continuously published online journal provides comprehensive, objective, and authoritative review articles written by recognized experts in the field. Edited by Thomas A. Einhorn, MD, and a distinguished Editorial Board, each issue of JBJS Reviews, updates the orthopaedic community on important topics in a concise, time-saving manner, providing expert insights into orthopaedic research and clinical experience. Comprehensive reviews, special features, and integrated CME provide orthopaedic surgeons with valuable perspectives on surgical practice and the latest advances in the field within twelve subspecialty areas: Basic Science, Education & Training, Elbow, Ethics, Foot & Ankle, Hand & Wrist, Hip, Infection, Knee, Oncology, Pediatrics, Pain Management, Rehabilitation, Shoulder, Spine, Sports Medicine, Trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信