STI Testing and Rates of STI Diagnoses Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a US HIV Cohort.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sexually transmitted diseases Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002124
Gina M Simoncini, Carl Armon, Kate Buchacz, Jonathan Mahnken, Qingjiang Hou, Kalliope Chagaris, Jack Fuhrer, Cynthia Mayer, Cynthia Firnhaber, Marcus D Durham, Alexander C Ewing, Kimberly Carlson, Jun Li
{"title":"STI Testing and Rates of STI Diagnoses Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a US HIV Cohort.","authors":"Gina M Simoncini, Carl Armon, Kate Buchacz, Jonathan Mahnken, Qingjiang Hou, Kalliope Chagaris, Jack Fuhrer, Cynthia Mayer, Cynthia Firnhaber, Marcus D Durham, Alexander C Ewing, Kimberly Carlson, Jun Li","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic affected sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and diagnosis rates in the United States, but these patterns have not been well characterized among people with HIV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed medical records data of HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) participants seen for HIV care from January 2019 to March 2021, with ≥1 CD4+ cell count and viral load test results recorded. We used Poisson regression models to estimate rate ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to compare STI testing and diagnoses rates on/after versus before March 1, 2020 (early COVID-19 pandemic [pandemic] vs. prepandemic).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2311 eligible patients, STI tests (STI cases, primarily defined as test results that were positive) were as follows during the analysis time frame: 4991 gonorrhea (157), 4978 chlamydia (135), and 4216 syphilis (114). Comparing pandemic versus prepandemic periods, STI testing RRs were 0.78 for both gonorrhea (95% CI, 0.73-0.82) and chlamydia (95% CI, 0.73-0.83), and 0.93 for syphilis (95% CI, 0.88-0.99); diagnosis rates were not statistically different. Multivariable models showed reduced testing for gonorrhea (adjusted RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.87) and chlamydia (adjusted RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86) for men who have sex with men, but not for other HIV transmission groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual health may not be seen for some time. Despite reduced STI testing, rates of STI diagnoses did not decrease. It will take a return to more routine screening and improved access to sexual health care to uncover the true impact of undetected or untreated STIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":"304-309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and diagnosis rates in the United States, but these patterns have not been well characterized among people with HIV.

Methods: We analyzed medical records data of HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) participants seen for HIV care from January 2019 to March 2021, with ≥1 CD4+ cell count and viral load test results recorded. We used Poisson regression models to estimate rate ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to compare STI testing and diagnoses rates on/after versus before March 1, 2020 (early COVID-19 pandemic [pandemic] vs. prepandemic).

Results: Of 2311 eligible patients, STI tests (STI cases, primarily defined as test results that were positive) were as follows during the analysis time frame: 4991 gonorrhea (157), 4978 chlamydia (135), and 4216 syphilis (114). Comparing pandemic versus prepandemic periods, STI testing RRs were 0.78 for both gonorrhea (95% CI, 0.73-0.82) and chlamydia (95% CI, 0.73-0.83), and 0.93 for syphilis (95% CI, 0.88-0.99); diagnosis rates were not statistically different. Multivariable models showed reduced testing for gonorrhea (adjusted RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.87) and chlamydia (adjusted RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86) for men who have sex with men, but not for other HIV transmission groups.

Conclusions: The fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual health may not be seen for some time. Despite reduced STI testing, rates of STI diagnoses did not decrease. It will take a return to more routine screening and improved access to sexual health care to uncover the true impact of undetected or untreated STIs.

在美国HIV队列中,在COVID-19大流行之前和期间的性传播感染检测和性传播感染诊断率
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行影响了美国性传播感染(STI)的检测和诊断率,但这些模式尚未在HIV感染者(PWH)中得到很好的表征。方法:我们分析了2019年1月至2021年3月HIV门诊研究(HOPS)参与者的医疗记录数据,记录了≥1 CD4+细胞计数和病毒载量检测结果。我们使用泊松回归模型来估计比率(RR)和95%置信区间(CI),以比较2020年3月1日前后(COVID-19大流行早期与大流行前)的STI检测和诊出率。结果:在2,311名符合条件的患者中,性传播感染检测(性传播感染病例,主要定义为阳性检测)在分析时间范围内如下:4,991例淋病(157例),4,978例衣原体(135例)和4,216例梅毒(114例)。将大流行时期与大流行前时期进行比较,淋病(CI: 0.73-0.82)和衣原体(CI: 0.73-0.83)的性传播感染检测的rr均为0.78,梅毒(CI: 0.88-0.99)的rr为0.93;诊断率无统计学差异。多变量模型显示,在男男性行为者中,淋病(校正RR 0.79, CI: 0.72-0.87)和衣原体(校正RR 0.78, CI: 0.71-0.86)的检测减少,但在其他艾滋病毒传播群体中没有。结论:COVID-19大流行对性健康的影响可能在一段时间内看不到。尽管性病检测减少了,但性病诊断率并没有下降。要发现未被发现或未经治疗的性传播感染的真正影响,需要恢复更常规的筛查和改善获得性保健的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信