Safety and effectiveness of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

IF 2.6 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Zhuo-Jun Wei, Lin Wang, Rui-Qi Wang, Yu Wang, Huan Chen, Hong-Lian Ma, Yu-Jin Xu
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Zhuo-Jun Wei, Lin Wang, Rui-Qi Wang, Yu Wang, Huan Chen, Hong-Lian Ma, Yu-Jin Xu","doi":"10.5306/wjco.v16.i3.101251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a common malignancy in China, often diagnosed at an advanced stage, with poor prognosis. Standard treatments such as definitive chemoradiotherapy offer limited survival benefits. Recent advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have shown promise, but their effectiveness and safety in conjunction with radiotherapy for unresectable ESCC require further exploration.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the safety and effectiveness of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced unresectable ESCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 80 patients with locally advanced unresectable ESCC who underwent induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy, recruited from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. All patients received 2-4 cycles of chemotherapy plus programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor, were re-evaluated to be inoperable, then received definitive radiotherapy or CCRT. Primary endpoint was treatment safety and tolerance. SPSS 26.0 software was used for data analysis. Th Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven (46.3%) patients received CCRT and 43 (53.7%) received radiotherapy alone. The most common treatment-related adverse events included radiation esophagitis (32/80, 40.0%) and anemia (49/80, 61.3%), with 22 (27.5%) experiencing grade ≥ 3 adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. After median follow-up of 16.5 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.2 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 19.9 months. The 1-year and 2-year PFS and OS were 55.8% and 31.6%, and 67.5% and 44.1%, respectively. Patients with partial response had better outcomes than those with stable disease: 1-year PFS 69.4% <i>vs</i> 43.9% (<i>P</i> = 0.011) and OS 83.2% <i>vs</i> 48.8% (<i>P</i> = 0.007). Induction therapy effectiveness and immunotherapy maintenance were independent prognostic factors for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chemotherapy combined with programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor followed by definitive radiotherapy or CCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC was safe and effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":23802,"journal":{"name":"World journal of clinical oncology","volume":"16 3","pages":"101251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i3.101251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a common malignancy in China, often diagnosed at an advanced stage, with poor prognosis. Standard treatments such as definitive chemoradiotherapy offer limited survival benefits. Recent advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have shown promise, but their effectiveness and safety in conjunction with radiotherapy for unresectable ESCC require further exploration.

Aim: To assess the safety and effectiveness of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced unresectable ESCC.

Methods: This retrospective study included 80 patients with locally advanced unresectable ESCC who underwent induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy, recruited from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. All patients received 2-4 cycles of chemotherapy plus programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor, were re-evaluated to be inoperable, then received definitive radiotherapy or CCRT. Primary endpoint was treatment safety and tolerance. SPSS 26.0 software was used for data analysis. Th Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.

Results: Thirty-seven (46.3%) patients received CCRT and 43 (53.7%) received radiotherapy alone. The most common treatment-related adverse events included radiation esophagitis (32/80, 40.0%) and anemia (49/80, 61.3%), with 22 (27.5%) experiencing grade ≥ 3 adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. After median follow-up of 16.5 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.2 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 19.9 months. The 1-year and 2-year PFS and OS were 55.8% and 31.6%, and 67.5% and 44.1%, respectively. Patients with partial response had better outcomes than those with stable disease: 1-year PFS 69.4% vs 43.9% (P = 0.011) and OS 83.2% vs 48.8% (P = 0.007). Induction therapy effectiveness and immunotherapy maintenance were independent prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusion: Chemotherapy combined with programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor followed by definitive radiotherapy or CCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC was safe and effective.

食管鳞状细胞癌诱导化疗免疫疗法后明确放疗或同时化疗放疗的安全性和有效性。
背景:食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)在中国是一种常见的恶性肿瘤,常在晚期诊断,预后较差。标准治疗,如明确的放化疗,提供有限的生存效益。免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗的最新进展显示出希望,但其与放疗联合治疗不可切除ESCC的有效性和安全性需要进一步探索。目的:评价局部晚期不可切除ESCC患者诱导免疫化疗后放疗或同步放化疗(CCRT)的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性研究来自浙江省肿瘤医院的80例局部晚期不可切除ESCC患者,他们接受了诱导免疫化疗和最终放疗。所有患者均接受2-4周期化疗+程序性细胞死亡1/程序性细胞死亡配体1抑制剂,重新评估为不能手术,然后接受最终放疗或CCRT。主要终点是治疗安全性和耐受性。采用SPSS 26.0软件进行数据分析。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。结果:37例(46.3%)患者接受CCRT, 43例(53.7%)患者单独接受放疗。最常见的治疗相关不良事件包括放射性食管炎(32/80,40.0%)和贫血(49/80,61.3%),其中22例(27.5%)发生≥3级不良事件。无治疗相关死亡发生。中位随访16.5个月后,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为14.2个月,中位总生存期(OS)为19.9个月。1年和2年PFS和OS分别为55.8%和31.6%,67.5%和44.1%。部分缓解的患者预后优于病情稳定的患者:1年PFS 69.4% vs 43.9% (P = 0.011), OS 83.2% vs 48.8% (P = 0.007)。诱导治疗的有效性和免疫治疗的维持是OS的独立预后因素。结论:化疗联合程序性细胞死亡1/程序性细胞死亡配体1抑制剂治疗局部晚期ESCC安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
585
期刊介绍: The WJCO is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJCO is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of oncology. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJCO is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJCO are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in oncology. Scope: Art of Oncology, Biology of Neoplasia, Breast Cancer, Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer-Related Complications, Diagnosis in Oncology, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Genetic Testing For Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, Hematologic Malignancy, Lung Cancer, Melanoma, Molecular Oncology, Neurooncology, Palliative and Supportive Care, Pediatric Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Translational Oncology, and Urologic Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信