Racial Disparities in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Care in the United States.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaf078
Adrianna I Acevedo-Fontanez, Sanjay R Patel
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Care in the United States.","authors":"Adrianna I Acevedo-Fontanez, Sanjay R Patel","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsaf078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As with much of medicine, racial health disparities exist in the care of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). These disparities impact all aspects of care from screening and diagnosis to treatment and long-term management. Substantial barriers exist for Black and other historically marginalized racial groups in the US to obtain evaluation for OSA, exacerbated by knowledge deficits about OSA. These barriers result in disease severity being much greater at the time of clinical diagnosis. Many screening and diagnostic tools used in OSA care were adopted based on their utility in White populations without consideration of their performance in other racial groups. For example, the reduced sensitivity of pulse oximetry in detecting desaturations in people with darker skin pigmentation has been heretofore ignored in defining hypopnea. In terms of treatment, outcomes from common therapies are worse in many racial minority groups. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is substantially lower and adenotonsillectomy is less effective in resolving OSA and more likely to produce respiratory complications in Black compared to White patients. Many coverage policies further exacerbate racial disparities in OSA care. Interventions such as greater utilization of home sleep apnea testing and automated feedback messaging of CPAP use exist that can help reduce disparities. However, the development of a more diverse workforce and prioritization of health equity in developing every step of OSA care will be necessary to ultimately eliminate racial disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As with much of medicine, racial health disparities exist in the care of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). These disparities impact all aspects of care from screening and diagnosis to treatment and long-term management. Substantial barriers exist for Black and other historically marginalized racial groups in the US to obtain evaluation for OSA, exacerbated by knowledge deficits about OSA. These barriers result in disease severity being much greater at the time of clinical diagnosis. Many screening and diagnostic tools used in OSA care were adopted based on their utility in White populations without consideration of their performance in other racial groups. For example, the reduced sensitivity of pulse oximetry in detecting desaturations in people with darker skin pigmentation has been heretofore ignored in defining hypopnea. In terms of treatment, outcomes from common therapies are worse in many racial minority groups. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is substantially lower and adenotonsillectomy is less effective in resolving OSA and more likely to produce respiratory complications in Black compared to White patients. Many coverage policies further exacerbate racial disparities in OSA care. Interventions such as greater utilization of home sleep apnea testing and automated feedback messaging of CPAP use exist that can help reduce disparities. However, the development of a more diverse workforce and prioritization of health equity in developing every step of OSA care will be necessary to ultimately eliminate racial disparities.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信