{"title":"Racial Disparities in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Care in the United States.","authors":"Adrianna I Acevedo-Fontanez, Sanjay R Patel","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsaf078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As with much of medicine, racial health disparities exist in the care of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). These disparities impact all aspects of care from screening and diagnosis to treatment and long-term management. Substantial barriers exist for Black and other historically marginalized racial groups in the US to obtain evaluation for OSA, exacerbated by knowledge deficits about OSA. These barriers result in disease severity being much greater at the time of clinical diagnosis. Many screening and diagnostic tools used in OSA care were adopted based on their utility in White populations without consideration of their performance in other racial groups. For example, the reduced sensitivity of pulse oximetry in detecting desaturations in people with darker skin pigmentation has been heretofore ignored in defining hypopnea. In terms of treatment, outcomes from common therapies are worse in many racial minority groups. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is substantially lower and adenotonsillectomy is less effective in resolving OSA and more likely to produce respiratory complications in Black compared to White patients. Many coverage policies further exacerbate racial disparities in OSA care. Interventions such as greater utilization of home sleep apnea testing and automated feedback messaging of CPAP use exist that can help reduce disparities. However, the development of a more diverse workforce and prioritization of health equity in developing every step of OSA care will be necessary to ultimately eliminate racial disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As with much of medicine, racial health disparities exist in the care of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). These disparities impact all aspects of care from screening and diagnosis to treatment and long-term management. Substantial barriers exist for Black and other historically marginalized racial groups in the US to obtain evaluation for OSA, exacerbated by knowledge deficits about OSA. These barriers result in disease severity being much greater at the time of clinical diagnosis. Many screening and diagnostic tools used in OSA care were adopted based on their utility in White populations without consideration of their performance in other racial groups. For example, the reduced sensitivity of pulse oximetry in detecting desaturations in people with darker skin pigmentation has been heretofore ignored in defining hypopnea. In terms of treatment, outcomes from common therapies are worse in many racial minority groups. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is substantially lower and adenotonsillectomy is less effective in resolving OSA and more likely to produce respiratory complications in Black compared to White patients. Many coverage policies further exacerbate racial disparities in OSA care. Interventions such as greater utilization of home sleep apnea testing and automated feedback messaging of CPAP use exist that can help reduce disparities. However, the development of a more diverse workforce and prioritization of health equity in developing every step of OSA care will be necessary to ultimately eliminate racial disparities.
期刊介绍:
SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including:
Genes
Molecules
Cells
Physiology
Neural systems and circuits
Behavior and cognition
Self-report
SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to:
Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms
In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders
Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms
Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease
Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.