Fixed CPAP at 10 cmH2O May Replace Manual Titration in Moderate to Severe OSA Patients: A Preliminary Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respirology Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1111/resp.70037
Wang Lu, Yan Chen, Qishan Wei, Yingxin Wu, Cuizhen Huang, Shanfeng Liang, Joerg Steier, Peter Catcheside, Danny Eckert, Andrew Wellman, Yuanming Luo
{"title":"Fixed CPAP at 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O May Replace Manual Titration in Moderate to Severe OSA Patients: A Preliminary Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Wang Lu, Yan Chen, Qishan Wei, Yingxin Wu, Cuizhen Huang, Shanfeng Liang, Joerg Steier, Peter Catcheside, Danny Eckert, Andrew Wellman, Yuanming Luo","doi":"10.1111/resp.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Patient compliance with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is similar using manual-titrated pressure compared to auto-titration, although auto-titration pressures are usually 2-5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O higher than manual pressure, indicating that CPAP moderately higher than the optimal pressure will not necessarily impair compliance. We try to find the tolerable highest CPAP which does not increase respiratory effort based on changes in lung volume, diaphragm electromyography (EMG) and breathing sensations in healthy volunteers and OSA patients to simplify pressure titration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Part 1, 12 healthy subjects and 16 OSA patients were enrolled in the measurement of expiratory reserve volume, diaphragm EMG, and expiratory muscle EMG at different CPAP levels. Breathing difficulty during different CPAP levels was assessed using a customised questionnaire in 35 healthy subjects and 33 OSA patients. Part 2, a two-night randomised crossover double-blind trial using the tolerable highest CPAP (10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) based on the results derived from Part 1 and the manually titrated pressure was performed in 25 OSA patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>End expiratory lung volume increased significantly with increasing CPAP. In general, diaphragm EMG changed little when CPAP ≤ 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Expiratory muscle activity appeared when CPAP > 12 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. There was no significant difference in subjective sensation of breathing difficulty with CPAP ≤ 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Sleep structure, AHI, and patient preference with 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O CPAP were not different from those under titrated pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that most patients with moderate to severe OSA can be effectively treated with CPAP at an initial pressure of 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O without pressure titration.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04925466.</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Patient compliance with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is similar using manual-titrated pressure compared to auto-titration, although auto-titration pressures are usually 2-5 cmH2O higher than manual pressure, indicating that CPAP moderately higher than the optimal pressure will not necessarily impair compliance. We try to find the tolerable highest CPAP which does not increase respiratory effort based on changes in lung volume, diaphragm electromyography (EMG) and breathing sensations in healthy volunteers and OSA patients to simplify pressure titration.

Methods: Part 1, 12 healthy subjects and 16 OSA patients were enrolled in the measurement of expiratory reserve volume, diaphragm EMG, and expiratory muscle EMG at different CPAP levels. Breathing difficulty during different CPAP levels was assessed using a customised questionnaire in 35 healthy subjects and 33 OSA patients. Part 2, a two-night randomised crossover double-blind trial using the tolerable highest CPAP (10 cmH2O) based on the results derived from Part 1 and the manually titrated pressure was performed in 25 OSA patients.

Results: End expiratory lung volume increased significantly with increasing CPAP. In general, diaphragm EMG changed little when CPAP ≤ 10 cmH2O. Expiratory muscle activity appeared when CPAP > 12 cmH2O. There was no significant difference in subjective sensation of breathing difficulty with CPAP ≤ 10 cmH2O. Sleep structure, AHI, and patient preference with 10 cmH2O CPAP were not different from those under titrated pressure.

Conclusions: This study suggests that most patients with moderate to severe OSA can be effectively treated with CPAP at an initial pressure of 10 cmH2O without pressure titration.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04925466.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respirology
Respirology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences. Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信