Songying Wu, Jingya Jane Pu, Edmond Ho Nang Pow, Pui Hang Leung, Xing-Na Yu, Yu-Xiong Su, Wei-Fa Yang
{"title":"Anatomical Landmark-guided Strategy for Computer-assisted Reconstruction of Infrastructure Maxillary Defects Using Free Fibula Flap.","authors":"Songying Wu, Jingya Jane Pu, Edmond Ho Nang Pow, Pui Hang Leung, Xing-Na Yu, Yu-Xiong Su, Wei-Fa Yang","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Computer-assisted surgery in head and neck reconstruction yields predictable and favorable clinical outcomes. However, there is a lack in the optimal arrangement of the fibula bone segments to re-establish the function and aesthetics of the maxilla.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study proposed a novel anatomical landmark-guided strategy for the virtual surgical planning (VSP) of infrastructure maxilla reconstruction using a free fibula flap. The optimal positioning of fibula segments was validated with a retrospective clinical study. Patients who underwent computer-assisted infrastructure maxillectomy and reconstruction with a free fibula flap from May 2017 to April 2024 were reviewed. Reproducibility of the landmarks and associated clinical parameters was assessed in VSP compared with the preoperative maxilla. Additionally, a structured quantitative approach was adopted for postoperative surgical outcome analysis by comparison of the postoperative maxilla and the VSP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients fulfilled the criteria of this study. In 11 cases, we conformed to the proposed reconstruction strategy (group A). In 9 cases, we adopted a modified approach (group B) with deviations in the count of fibula segments and positioning strategy. In group A, the pooled median landmark error was 2.19 mm (interquartile range, 1.63-2.91 mm) in the VSP compared with the preoperative maxilla; in group B, the error was 4.54 mm (interquartile range, 2.05-6.15 mm). The clinical parameters demonstrated satisfactory recapture of the alveolar arch and maxillary width.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This anatomical landmark-guided strategy was validated with satisfactory reproducibility of the quantitative metrics in the VSP. The anatomical landmarks and associated clinical parameters provided a structured quantitative approach for postoperative analysis of computer-assisted maxillary reconstruction using FFFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 3","pages":"e6626"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Computer-assisted surgery in head and neck reconstruction yields predictable and favorable clinical outcomes. However, there is a lack in the optimal arrangement of the fibula bone segments to re-establish the function and aesthetics of the maxilla.
Methods: This study proposed a novel anatomical landmark-guided strategy for the virtual surgical planning (VSP) of infrastructure maxilla reconstruction using a free fibula flap. The optimal positioning of fibula segments was validated with a retrospective clinical study. Patients who underwent computer-assisted infrastructure maxillectomy and reconstruction with a free fibula flap from May 2017 to April 2024 were reviewed. Reproducibility of the landmarks and associated clinical parameters was assessed in VSP compared with the preoperative maxilla. Additionally, a structured quantitative approach was adopted for postoperative surgical outcome analysis by comparison of the postoperative maxilla and the VSP.
Results: Twenty patients fulfilled the criteria of this study. In 11 cases, we conformed to the proposed reconstruction strategy (group A). In 9 cases, we adopted a modified approach (group B) with deviations in the count of fibula segments and positioning strategy. In group A, the pooled median landmark error was 2.19 mm (interquartile range, 1.63-2.91 mm) in the VSP compared with the preoperative maxilla; in group B, the error was 4.54 mm (interquartile range, 2.05-6.15 mm). The clinical parameters demonstrated satisfactory recapture of the alveolar arch and maxillary width.
Conclusions: This anatomical landmark-guided strategy was validated with satisfactory reproducibility of the quantitative metrics in the VSP. The anatomical landmarks and associated clinical parameters provided a structured quantitative approach for postoperative analysis of computer-assisted maxillary reconstruction using FFFs.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.