Processed Meat Intake and Changes in Weight, Waist, Body Mass Index, and Fat Mass: Systematic Literature Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment of Cohort Studies of Adults.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Mina N Händel, Jeanett F Rohde, Sofus C Larsen, Thorkild I A Sørensen, Berit L Heitmann
{"title":"Processed Meat Intake and Changes in Weight, Waist, Body Mass Index, and Fat Mass: Systematic Literature Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment of Cohort Studies of Adults.","authors":"Mina N Händel, Jeanett F Rohde, Sofus C Larsen, Thorkild I A Sørensen, Berit L Heitmann","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Previous reviews have indicated that abstaining from processed meat may play a part in weight management; however, the certainty of these results has not been assessed systematically.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to estimate the association between processed meat intake (including studies specifically mentioning \"processed meat\" and/or listing processed meat items and subsequent change in weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), and fat mass among adults by summarizing evidence of cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed in Embase and Medline via Ovid (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) from inception to June 2024.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>The data were extracted by 2 reviewers independently. The certainty in the estimates was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) tool, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Data analyses: </strong>The search resulted in a total of 2974 potential articles, of which 11 cohort studies (6 unique studies) were eligible for inclusion. Three studies (n = 381 291) were included in the random-effects model of measured body weight, resulting in a summary increase of 0.26 kg/y per 1 daily serving of processed meat (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.48; τ2: 0.03; I2: 92.95%). Four studies (n = 51 310) were included in the random-effects model of measured waist circumference, resulting in a summary increase of 0.14 cm/y per 1 daily serving of processed meat (95% CI, 0.02-0.26; τ2: 0.01; I2: 81.12%). The certainties of these estimates were low, due to serious risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analyses suggested a very weak association between increased processed meat intake and subsequent increase in measured weight, larger measured waist circumference, increase in self-reported BMI, and an increase in fat mass. However, due to methodological limitations the certainty of these results was low, and cautious interpretation of the results is warranted.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration No. CRD42022335022.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Previous reviews have indicated that abstaining from processed meat may play a part in weight management; however, the certainty of these results has not been assessed systematically.

Objective: We sought to estimate the association between processed meat intake (including studies specifically mentioning "processed meat" and/or listing processed meat items and subsequent change in weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), and fat mass among adults by summarizing evidence of cohort studies.

Data sources: A systematic literature search was performed in Embase and Medline via Ovid (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) from inception to June 2024.

Data extraction: The data were extracted by 2 reviewers independently. The certainty in the estimates was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) tool, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool.

Data analyses: The search resulted in a total of 2974 potential articles, of which 11 cohort studies (6 unique studies) were eligible for inclusion. Three studies (n = 381 291) were included in the random-effects model of measured body weight, resulting in a summary increase of 0.26 kg/y per 1 daily serving of processed meat (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.48; τ2: 0.03; I2: 92.95%). Four studies (n = 51 310) were included in the random-effects model of measured waist circumference, resulting in a summary increase of 0.14 cm/y per 1 daily serving of processed meat (95% CI, 0.02-0.26; τ2: 0.01; I2: 81.12%). The certainties of these estimates were low, due to serious risk of bias.

Conclusion: The analyses suggested a very weak association between increased processed meat intake and subsequent increase in measured weight, larger measured waist circumference, increase in self-reported BMI, and an increase in fat mass. However, due to methodological limitations the certainty of these results was low, and cautious interpretation of the results is warranted.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration No. CRD42022335022.

背景:以往的综述表明,禁食加工肉类可能有助于控制体重;然而,这些结果的确定性尚未得到系统评估:我们试图通过总结队列研究的证据,估计加工肉类摄入量(包括特别提及 "加工肉类 "和/或列出加工肉类项目的研究)与成年人体重、腰围、体重指数(BMI)和脂肪量的后续变化之间的关系:从开始到 2024 年 6 月,通过 Ovid 在 Embase 和 Medline(包括 Cochrane 系统综述数据库)中进行了系统文献检索:数据由两名审稿人独立提取。采用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工具对估计值的确定性进行评估,采用科克伦非随机干预研究偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)评估工具对偏倚风险进行评估:通过检索,共有 2974 篇潜在文章,其中 11 项队列研究(6 项唯一研究)符合纳入条件。三项研究(n = 381 291)被纳入测量体重的随机效应模型,结果是每天每份加工肉类的总增加量为 0.26 kg/y(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.03-0.48;τ2:0.03;I2:92.95%)。四项研究(n = 51 310)被纳入了测量腰围的随机效应模型,结果是每天每份加工肉类增加 0.14 厘米/年(95% 置信区间[CI]:0.02-0.26;τ2:0.01;I2:81.12%)。由于存在严重的偏倚风险,这些估计值的确定性较低:分析表明,加工肉类摄入量的增加与随后测量体重的增加、测量腰围的增大、自我报告的体重指数的增加以及脂肪量的增加之间存在非常微弱的关联。然而,由于方法上的局限性,这些结果的确定性很低,因此需要谨慎解释这些结果:系统综述注册:PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022335022。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信