Correlations between Dysphagia Severity Scale Scores and Clinical Indices in Individuals with Multiple System Atrophy.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ryunosuke Nagao, Yasuaki Mizutani, Kazuya Kawabata, Junichiro Yoshimoto, Yoko Inamoto, Seiko Shibata, Mizuki Ito, Yohei Otaka, Hirohisa Watanabe
{"title":"Correlations between Dysphagia Severity Scale Scores and Clinical Indices in Individuals with Multiple System Atrophy.","authors":"Ryunosuke Nagao, Yasuaki Mizutani, Kazuya Kawabata, Junichiro Yoshimoto, Yoko Inamoto, Seiko Shibata, Mizuki Ito, Yohei Otaka, Hirohisa Watanabe","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysphagia significantly impacts prognosis in individuals with multiple system atrophy (MSA). While video-based assessments are practical, their limited availability highlights the need for a simple tool such as the Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS) in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the utility of the DSS in assessing dysphagia in MSA patients and its correlations with clinical indices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined 43 MSA patients using the DSS and other clinical measures, including the Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS) and cerebrospinal fluid 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels. As a follow-up, 11 of 43 patients underwent a secondary DSS evaluation. Spearman's correlation and linear mixed models were used to analyze cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DSS scores were significantly correlated with UMSARS Parts 1, 2, and 4, as well as disease duration and blood pressure changes. This indicates that the DSS is sensitive to MSA-related motor and autonomic dysfunctions, and that the DSS could provide a more detailed assessment of swallowing function compared with the UMSARS Part 1 swallowing subscore. Additionally, DSS score was correlated with cerebrospinal fluid 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels. Our longitudinal analysis further supported the role of DSS score as a reliable marker of dysphagia progression over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DSS is a sensitive and practical tool for evaluating dysphagia. Thus, combining the DSS and UMSARS could improve dysphagia monitoring in individuals with MSA. Our data support the use of the DSS as a valuable clinical and research tool in MSA management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dysphagia significantly impacts prognosis in individuals with multiple system atrophy (MSA). While video-based assessments are practical, their limited availability highlights the need for a simple tool such as the Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS) in clinical practice.

Objectives: To evaluate the utility of the DSS in assessing dysphagia in MSA patients and its correlations with clinical indices.

Methods: We examined 43 MSA patients using the DSS and other clinical measures, including the Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS) and cerebrospinal fluid 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels. As a follow-up, 11 of 43 patients underwent a secondary DSS evaluation. Spearman's correlation and linear mixed models were used to analyze cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships.

Results: DSS scores were significantly correlated with UMSARS Parts 1, 2, and 4, as well as disease duration and blood pressure changes. This indicates that the DSS is sensitive to MSA-related motor and autonomic dysfunctions, and that the DSS could provide a more detailed assessment of swallowing function compared with the UMSARS Part 1 swallowing subscore. Additionally, DSS score was correlated with cerebrospinal fluid 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels. Our longitudinal analysis further supported the role of DSS score as a reliable marker of dysphagia progression over time.

Conclusions: The DSS is a sensitive and practical tool for evaluating dysphagia. Thus, combining the DSS and UMSARS could improve dysphagia monitoring in individuals with MSA. Our data support the use of the DSS as a valuable clinical and research tool in MSA management.

多系统萎缩患者吞咽困难严重程度量表评分与临床指标之间的相关性。
背景:吞咽困难严重影响多系统萎缩症(MSA)患者的预后。虽然基于视频的评估很实用,但其可用性有限,这凸显了临床实践中对吞咽困难严重程度量表(DSS)等简单工具的需求:评估 DSS 在评估 MSA 患者吞咽困难方面的实用性及其与临床指标的相关性:我们使用 DSS 和其他临床指标(包括统一 MSA 评定量表 (UMSARS) 和脑脊液 5- 羟基吲哚乙酸水平)对 43 名 MSA 患者进行了检查。作为随访,43 名患者中有 11 名接受了 DSS 二次评估。斯皮尔曼相关性和线性混合模型用于分析横截面和纵向关系:结果:DSS评分与UMSARS第1、2和4部分以及病程和血压变化有明显相关性。这表明 DSS 对 MSA 相关的运动和自主神经功能障碍很敏感,与 UMSARS 第 1 部分吞咽子分数相比,DSS 可以提供更详细的吞咽功能评估。此外,DSS评分与脑脊液中5-羟基吲哚乙酸水平相关。我们的纵向分析进一步支持了 DSS 评分作为吞咽困难随时间发展的可靠标记的作用:结论:DSS 是评估吞咽困难的敏感而实用的工具。因此,将 DSS 和 UMSARS 结合使用可改善对 MSA 患者吞咽困难的监测。我们的数据支持将 DSS 作为 MSA 管理中一种有价值的临床和研究工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信