Comparison of different methods to evaluate tissue damage in response to leaf dehydration in Quercus ilex L. and Q. faginea Lam.

IF 5.4 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Miquel Nadal, José Javier Peguero-Pina, Domingo Sancho-Knapik, Eustaquio Gil-Pelegrín
{"title":"Comparison of different methods to evaluate tissue damage in response to leaf dehydration in Quercus ilex L. and Q. faginea Lam.","authors":"Miquel Nadal, José Javier Peguero-Pina, Domingo Sancho-Knapik, Eustaquio Gil-Pelegrín","doi":"10.1111/ppl.70178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Determination of the point of critical damage in plant organs is crucial to elucidate the causes of plant mortality, but the different methodologies to quantify such damage have not been previously compared under the same experimental conditions. Here, we tested different indicators to evaluate damage in leaves of Quercus faginea and Q. ilex; in the latter case, 1- and 2-year-old leaves were included. The damage indicators were relative electrolyte leakage (REL), rehydration capacity (evaluated as the percentage loss of rehydration capacity; PLRC), chlorophyll fluorescence (maximum quantum yield of PSII; F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>), and the viability marker triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). These damage indicators were evaluated in different sets of detached leaves for each species and leaf age dehydrated on the lab bench. Electrolyte leakage and PLRC showed a gradual response to decreasing relative water content, whereas F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> and TTC showed a threshold-like response, especially in the case of Q. faginea. Electrolyte leakage and TTC did not show differences between species and/or leaf ages. Measurement of F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> in dehydrating leaves proved to be the most straightforward, rapid and precise method for damage quantification, allowing for the differentiation in dehydration tolerance between Q. ilex and Q. faginea.</p>","PeriodicalId":20164,"journal":{"name":"Physiologia plantarum","volume":"177 2","pages":"e70178"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiologia plantarum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determination of the point of critical damage in plant organs is crucial to elucidate the causes of plant mortality, but the different methodologies to quantify such damage have not been previously compared under the same experimental conditions. Here, we tested different indicators to evaluate damage in leaves of Quercus faginea and Q. ilex; in the latter case, 1- and 2-year-old leaves were included. The damage indicators were relative electrolyte leakage (REL), rehydration capacity (evaluated as the percentage loss of rehydration capacity; PLRC), chlorophyll fluorescence (maximum quantum yield of PSII; Fv/Fm), and the viability marker triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). These damage indicators were evaluated in different sets of detached leaves for each species and leaf age dehydrated on the lab bench. Electrolyte leakage and PLRC showed a gradual response to decreasing relative water content, whereas Fv/Fm and TTC showed a threshold-like response, especially in the case of Q. faginea. Electrolyte leakage and TTC did not show differences between species and/or leaf ages. Measurement of Fv/Fm in dehydrating leaves proved to be the most straightforward, rapid and precise method for damage quantification, allowing for the differentiation in dehydration tolerance between Q. ilex and Q. faginea.

比较不同方法评估叶片脱水对柞树和杉树的组织损伤
确定植物器官的临界损伤点对于阐明植物死亡的原因至关重要,但在相同的实验条件下,量化这种损伤的不同方法尚未得到比较。本研究采用不同的指标评价火种栎和冬青叶片的危害程度;在后一种情况下,包括1岁和2岁的叶子。损伤指标为相对电解质泄漏量(REL)、再水合能力(以再水合能力损失百分比评估;PLRC)、叶绿素荧光(PSII的最大量子产率;Fv/Fm)和活力标记物三苯四唑氯(TTC)。在实验台上对不同种类的离体叶片和叶片脱水年龄进行了评价。电解质泄漏和PLRC对相对含水量的降低表现出逐渐的响应,而Fv/Fm和TTC则表现出类似阈值的响应,特别是在黑毛菌中。电解质泄漏和TTC在种间和叶龄间无显著差异。结果表明,测定干燥叶片的Fv/Fm值是最直接、最快速、最精确的危害定量方法,可用于区分冬青和木棉的脱水耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiologia plantarum
Physiologia plantarum 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: Physiologia Plantarum is an international journal committed to publishing the best full-length original research papers that advance our understanding of primary mechanisms of plant development, growth and productivity as well as plant interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment. All organisational levels of experimental plant biology – from molecular and cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics to ecophysiology and global change biology – fall within the scope of the journal. The content is distributed between 5 main subject areas supervised by Subject Editors specialised in the respective domain: (1) biochemistry and metabolism, (2) ecophysiology, stress and adaptation, (3) uptake, transport and assimilation, (4) development, growth and differentiation, (5) photobiology and photosynthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信