Miquel Nadal, José Javier Peguero-Pina, Domingo Sancho-Knapik, Eustaquio Gil-Pelegrín
{"title":"Comparison of different methods to evaluate tissue damage in response to leaf dehydration in Quercus ilex L. and Q. faginea Lam.","authors":"Miquel Nadal, José Javier Peguero-Pina, Domingo Sancho-Knapik, Eustaquio Gil-Pelegrín","doi":"10.1111/ppl.70178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Determination of the point of critical damage in plant organs is crucial to elucidate the causes of plant mortality, but the different methodologies to quantify such damage have not been previously compared under the same experimental conditions. Here, we tested different indicators to evaluate damage in leaves of Quercus faginea and Q. ilex; in the latter case, 1- and 2-year-old leaves were included. The damage indicators were relative electrolyte leakage (REL), rehydration capacity (evaluated as the percentage loss of rehydration capacity; PLRC), chlorophyll fluorescence (maximum quantum yield of PSII; F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>), and the viability marker triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). These damage indicators were evaluated in different sets of detached leaves for each species and leaf age dehydrated on the lab bench. Electrolyte leakage and PLRC showed a gradual response to decreasing relative water content, whereas F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> and TTC showed a threshold-like response, especially in the case of Q. faginea. Electrolyte leakage and TTC did not show differences between species and/or leaf ages. Measurement of F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> in dehydrating leaves proved to be the most straightforward, rapid and precise method for damage quantification, allowing for the differentiation in dehydration tolerance between Q. ilex and Q. faginea.</p>","PeriodicalId":20164,"journal":{"name":"Physiologia plantarum","volume":"177 2","pages":"e70178"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiologia plantarum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Determination of the point of critical damage in plant organs is crucial to elucidate the causes of plant mortality, but the different methodologies to quantify such damage have not been previously compared under the same experimental conditions. Here, we tested different indicators to evaluate damage in leaves of Quercus faginea and Q. ilex; in the latter case, 1- and 2-year-old leaves were included. The damage indicators were relative electrolyte leakage (REL), rehydration capacity (evaluated as the percentage loss of rehydration capacity; PLRC), chlorophyll fluorescence (maximum quantum yield of PSII; Fv/Fm), and the viability marker triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). These damage indicators were evaluated in different sets of detached leaves for each species and leaf age dehydrated on the lab bench. Electrolyte leakage and PLRC showed a gradual response to decreasing relative water content, whereas Fv/Fm and TTC showed a threshold-like response, especially in the case of Q. faginea. Electrolyte leakage and TTC did not show differences between species and/or leaf ages. Measurement of Fv/Fm in dehydrating leaves proved to be the most straightforward, rapid and precise method for damage quantification, allowing for the differentiation in dehydration tolerance between Q. ilex and Q. faginea.
期刊介绍:
Physiologia Plantarum is an international journal committed to publishing the best full-length original research papers that advance our understanding of primary mechanisms of plant development, growth and productivity as well as plant interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment. All organisational levels of experimental plant biology – from molecular and cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics to ecophysiology and global change biology – fall within the scope of the journal. The content is distributed between 5 main subject areas supervised by Subject Editors specialised in the respective domain: (1) biochemistry and metabolism, (2) ecophysiology, stress and adaptation, (3) uptake, transport and assimilation, (4) development, growth and differentiation, (5) photobiology and photosynthesis.