Continuous versus interrupted sutures for closure of scleral pocket and conjunctiva after evisceration and placement of acrylic ocular implant.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ahmed Ali Amer, Hasan Naveed, Ibrahim Amer, Hamdy Osman Abdelrahman Osman, Mostafa Abdelrahman Ahmed Mohamed, Ashraf Mohammed GadElkareem, Ahmed Abdallah Elbarawy, Zisis Gatzioufas, Mohamed Elalfy, Mohamed A ElShafie
{"title":"Continuous versus interrupted sutures for closure of scleral pocket and conjunctiva after evisceration and placement of acrylic ocular implant.","authors":"Ahmed Ali Amer, Hasan Naveed, Ibrahim Amer, Hamdy Osman Abdelrahman Osman, Mostafa Abdelrahman Ahmed Mohamed, Ashraf Mohammed GadElkareem, Ahmed Abdallah Elbarawy, Zisis Gatzioufas, Mohamed Elalfy, Mohamed A ElShafie","doi":"10.1159/000545331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Various methods of conjunctival closure have been described, with no consensus of preference. We designed this study to compare continuous versus interrupted sutures for closure of scleral pocket and conjunctiva after evisceration and acrylic ocular implant installation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective comparative observational study conducted at South Valley University Hospital on all ocular evisceration cases with acrylic implants from 1 March 2019 to 31 March 2024. For each patient, clinical data were perused including demographics, indications, clinical history, operative details, and postoperative follow-up data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients were included in this study. Twenty-seven were allocated to group A (continuous sutures) and 20 patients to group B (interrupted sutures). The mean age of patients was 38.52 ± 12.8 and 39.35 ± 14.5 in groups A and B respectively (P value = 0.839). Males represented 51.9% (14\\27) and 50% (10\\20) of groups A and B respectively (P value = 0.901). Absolute glaucoma was the indication in 5 (18.5%) and 3 (15%) patients in groups A and B respectively, anterior staphyloma was the indication in 7 (25.9%) and 5 (25%) patients respectively, Atrophia/Phthisis was the indication in 6 (22.2%) and 5 (25%) patients respectively, while Old Trauma was the indication in 9 (33.3%) and 7 (35%) patients respectively with P value = 0.769. The median size of the acrylic implant used was 20mm in both groups. Patients were followed up on average in group A for 20.19 ± 3.2 months, in group B for 19.95 ± 3.4 months (P value= 0.812). No cases of infection or implant extrusion were observed in both groups. But in group B, there were 3 cases (15%) of wound dehiscence and implant exposure while no reported cases in group A (0%) with clinically significant P value (0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous suturing for closure, as opposed to interrupted sutures, produces better wound outcomes when closing the scleral pocket and conjunctiva post evisceration and acrylic ocular implant installation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19662,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Various methods of conjunctival closure have been described, with no consensus of preference. We designed this study to compare continuous versus interrupted sutures for closure of scleral pocket and conjunctiva after evisceration and acrylic ocular implant installation.

Methods: This study was a retrospective comparative observational study conducted at South Valley University Hospital on all ocular evisceration cases with acrylic implants from 1 March 2019 to 31 March 2024. For each patient, clinical data were perused including demographics, indications, clinical history, operative details, and postoperative follow-up data.

Results: Forty-seven patients were included in this study. Twenty-seven were allocated to group A (continuous sutures) and 20 patients to group B (interrupted sutures). The mean age of patients was 38.52 ± 12.8 and 39.35 ± 14.5 in groups A and B respectively (P value = 0.839). Males represented 51.9% (14\27) and 50% (10\20) of groups A and B respectively (P value = 0.901). Absolute glaucoma was the indication in 5 (18.5%) and 3 (15%) patients in groups A and B respectively, anterior staphyloma was the indication in 7 (25.9%) and 5 (25%) patients respectively, Atrophia/Phthisis was the indication in 6 (22.2%) and 5 (25%) patients respectively, while Old Trauma was the indication in 9 (33.3%) and 7 (35%) patients respectively with P value = 0.769. The median size of the acrylic implant used was 20mm in both groups. Patients were followed up on average in group A for 20.19 ± 3.2 months, in group B for 19.95 ± 3.4 months (P value= 0.812). No cases of infection or implant extrusion were observed in both groups. But in group B, there were 3 cases (15%) of wound dehiscence and implant exposure while no reported cases in group A (0%) with clinically significant P value (0.029).

Conclusion: Continuous suturing for closure, as opposed to interrupted sutures, produces better wound outcomes when closing the scleral pocket and conjunctiva post evisceration and acrylic ocular implant installation.

在剥离并植入丙烯酸眼球植入物后缝合巩膜袋和结膜时,连续缝合与间断缝合的对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmic Research
Ophthalmic Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Ophthalmic Research'' features original papers and reviews reporting on translational and clinical studies. Authors from throughout the world cover research topics on every field in connection with physical, physiologic, pharmacological, biochemical and molecular biological aspects of ophthalmology. This journal also aims to provide a record of international clinical research for both researchers and clinicians in ophthalmology. Finally, the transfer of information from fundamental research to clinical research and clinical practice is particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信