Risk factors and prevention and treatment methods of anastomotic stricture after esophageal atresia repair: a literature review.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Hao Chen, Zhu-Xin Chen, Guo-Qing Shi
{"title":"Risk factors and prevention and treatment methods of anastomotic stricture after esophageal atresia repair: a literature review.","authors":"Hao Chen, Zhu-Xin Chen, Guo-Qing Shi","doi":"10.1007/s00383-025-05996-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review examines the common risk factors associated with anastomotic stricture (AS) following esophageal atresia (EA) repair and evaluates the current understanding and clinical practices concerning esophageal dilation, which remains the predominant therapeutic approach. We present emerging evidence on adjunctive therapies for recurrent and refractory strictures, including esophageal stenting, endoscopic incision therapy, mitomycin C application, local steroid injections, cell sheet transplantation, and surgical interventions. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, with a cutoff date of December 31, 2024, encompassing all relevant studies and reviews pertinent to this topic, with a particular emphasis on refractory and recurrent strictures. Given the scarcity of evidence-based data on AS in children with EA, we also critically analyze findings from adult literature and studies addressing esophageal strictures caused by various etiologies to provide a more comprehensive understanding. The pathogenesis of AS is multifactorial, with a key contributing factor being the significant gap between the proximal and distal esophageal segments. This anatomical disparity increases anastomotic tension, thereby elevating the likelihood of stricture formation. A thorough identification and detailed understanding of the risk factors associated with AS are crucial for enhancing patient outcomes and developing effective preventive strategies. Currently, the evidence regarding esophageal dilation is insufficient to establish the superiority of any single technique, particularly between balloon and bougie dilators. Recurrent and refractory strictures remain a challenge, as no pharmacological and mechanical adjunctive interventions have demonstrated sufficient feasibility, efficacy, and safety to fundamentally change clinical practice. While some results show promise, transformative outcomes have not yet been achieved, and further research is needed to establish evidence-based best treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"41 1","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-025-05996-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review examines the common risk factors associated with anastomotic stricture (AS) following esophageal atresia (EA) repair and evaluates the current understanding and clinical practices concerning esophageal dilation, which remains the predominant therapeutic approach. We present emerging evidence on adjunctive therapies for recurrent and refractory strictures, including esophageal stenting, endoscopic incision therapy, mitomycin C application, local steroid injections, cell sheet transplantation, and surgical interventions. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, with a cutoff date of December 31, 2024, encompassing all relevant studies and reviews pertinent to this topic, with a particular emphasis on refractory and recurrent strictures. Given the scarcity of evidence-based data on AS in children with EA, we also critically analyze findings from adult literature and studies addressing esophageal strictures caused by various etiologies to provide a more comprehensive understanding. The pathogenesis of AS is multifactorial, with a key contributing factor being the significant gap between the proximal and distal esophageal segments. This anatomical disparity increases anastomotic tension, thereby elevating the likelihood of stricture formation. A thorough identification and detailed understanding of the risk factors associated with AS are crucial for enhancing patient outcomes and developing effective preventive strategies. Currently, the evidence regarding esophageal dilation is insufficient to establish the superiority of any single technique, particularly between balloon and bougie dilators. Recurrent and refractory strictures remain a challenge, as no pharmacological and mechanical adjunctive interventions have demonstrated sufficient feasibility, efficacy, and safety to fundamentally change clinical practice. While some results show promise, transformative outcomes have not yet been achieved, and further research is needed to establish evidence-based best treatment strategies.

食管闭锁修复术后吻合口狭窄的危险因素及防治方法:文献综述。
本文综述了食管闭锁(EA)修复后吻合口狭窄(AS)的常见危险因素,并评估了目前对食管扩张的认识和临床实践,食管扩张仍然是主要的治疗方法。我们提出了关于复发性和难治性狭窄的辅助治疗的新证据,包括食管支架置入术、内镜切口治疗、丝裂霉素C应用、局部类固醇注射、细胞片移植和手术干预。使用PubMed进行了全面的文献综述,截止日期为2024年12月31日,包括与该主题相关的所有相关研究和综述,特别强调难治性和复发性狭窄。鉴于缺乏关于EA患儿AS的循证数据,我们也批判性地分析了成人文献和关于各种病因引起的食管狭窄的研究结果,以提供更全面的理解。AS的发病机制是多因素的,其中一个关键因素是近端和远端食管段之间的明显间隙。这种解剖差异增加了吻合口张力,从而增加了狭窄形成的可能性。彻底识别和详细了解与AS相关的风险因素对于提高患者预后和制定有效的预防策略至关重要。目前,关于食管扩张的证据不足以确定任何一种技术的优越性,特别是在球囊扩张器和膨胀扩张器之间。复发性和难治性狭窄仍然是一个挑战,因为没有药物和机械辅助干预已经证明足够的可行性,有效性和安全性,从根本上改变临床实践。虽然一些结果显示出希望,但尚未取得变革性成果,需要进一步研究以建立以证据为基础的最佳治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信