Computed Tomography Scanographic Analysis of Symptomatic Limb Length Discrepancy.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Alex Fleischman, Michael An, Wendy Young
{"title":"Computed Tomography Scanographic Analysis of Symptomatic Limb Length Discrepancy.","authors":"Alex Fleischman, Michael An, Wendy Young","doi":"10.7547/23-179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limb length discrepancy (LLD) is diagnosed when one limb is noted to be longer than the other. Symptomatic LLD is defined as the appearance of symptoms secondary to the compensatory mechanisms of LLD with a measured limb length differential. Several studies have been conducted analyzing LLD through plain radiographs, yet there are only a few studies analyzing LLD using computed tomography (CT) scanography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective baseline study of patients between December 2007 and December 2017 in order to reinforce the side dominance and associated measurements of lower-extremity limb lengths through CT scanograms. The average femoral, tibial, and total limb length was calculated for each extremity. Paired sample t tests were conducted between each osseous component and total limb length.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following institutional review board review and exemption, 400 charts that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The left limb was significantly longer than the right limb by approximately 0.10 cm (P < .05). The left femur was significantly longer than the right femur by approximately 0.07 cm (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the tibial length (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a significant limb length differential in which the left limb was longer than the right limb secondary to increased femoral length. Although our results may seem imperative to our understanding of LLD, it is important to state that all of our differentials were similar, with large SDs, indicating low power of the study. Future research with an increased number of participants is warranted to reinforce the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/23-179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limb length discrepancy (LLD) is diagnosed when one limb is noted to be longer than the other. Symptomatic LLD is defined as the appearance of symptoms secondary to the compensatory mechanisms of LLD with a measured limb length differential. Several studies have been conducted analyzing LLD through plain radiographs, yet there are only a few studies analyzing LLD using computed tomography (CT) scanography.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective baseline study of patients between December 2007 and December 2017 in order to reinforce the side dominance and associated measurements of lower-extremity limb lengths through CT scanograms. The average femoral, tibial, and total limb length was calculated for each extremity. Paired sample t tests were conducted between each osseous component and total limb length.

Results: Following institutional review board review and exemption, 400 charts that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The left limb was significantly longer than the right limb by approximately 0.10 cm (P < .05). The left femur was significantly longer than the right femur by approximately 0.07 cm (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the tibial length (P > .05).

Conclusions: There was a significant limb length differential in which the left limb was longer than the right limb secondary to increased femoral length. Although our results may seem imperative to our understanding of LLD, it is important to state that all of our differentials were similar, with large SDs, indicating low power of the study. Future research with an increased number of participants is warranted to reinforce the findings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信