Beliefs About and Use of Forefoot Lateral Wedging in Podiatric Medical Practice: A Survey of Podiatric Physicians in New Zealand.

IF 0.5 4区医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7547/22-022

Aaron Jackson, Kelly Sheerin, Duncan Reid, Matthew R Carroll

{"title":"Beliefs About and Use of Forefoot Lateral Wedging in Podiatric Medical Practice: A Survey of Podiatric Physicians in New Zealand.","authors":"Aaron Jackson, Kelly Sheerin, Duncan Reid, Matthew R Carroll","doi":"10.7547/22-022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Evidence is limited exploring the beliefs and application of forefoot lateral wedges (FLWs) in clinical practice by podiatric physicians. We aimed to understand rationale and beliefs that guide the use of FLWs among podiatrists.Methods: A cross-sectional study of New Zealand (NZ) podiatrists was conducted between May 31 and July 26, 2021. Data were collected anonymously using a Web-based survey platform. The 30-item survey included questions to elicit participant characteristics, why and when podiatrists used orthosis modifications, what biomechanical assumptions influenced clinical decision-making, and how podiatrists fabricated and placed FLWs.Results: Of 65 survey completers, most were trained in NZ (90.8%), had more than 10 years' experience (70.8%), and worked with a mixed case load (60.0%); 77.3% prescribed zero to ten foot orthoses per week, with FLWs used in 44% of prescriptions. Peroneal tendon injuries and chronic ankle instability were most likely to be treated with FLWs. The most common belief was that FLWs increase first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion (86.2%). The FLWs were regularly manufactured from 3-mm (73.8%), medium-density ethyl vinyl acetate (92.9%) and positioned from the calcaneocuboid joint (54.8%) to the sulcus (78.6%).Conclusions: Podiatrists in NZ frequently use FLWs. These were generally manufactured from 3-mm, medium-density ethyl vinyl acetate and positioned from the calcaneocuboid joint to the sulcus. The most common rationales for use were to increase first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion, shift the center of pressure medially, and balance the foot. A discordance was found between the theories of foot function on which clinicians placed the greatest importance and the biomechanical outcomes they thought were being achieved. Survey data also highlighted inconsistency in the nomenclature used to describe FLW thickness and inclination.","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/22-022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence is limited exploring the beliefs and application of forefoot lateral wedges (FLWs) in clinical practice by podiatric physicians. We aimed to understand rationale and beliefs that guide the use of FLWs among podiatrists.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of New Zealand (NZ) podiatrists was conducted between May 31 and July 26, 2021. Data were collected anonymously using a Web-based survey platform. The 30-item survey included questions to elicit participant characteristics, why and when podiatrists used orthosis modifications, what biomechanical assumptions influenced clinical decision-making, and how podiatrists fabricated and placed FLWs.

Results: Of 65 survey completers, most were trained in NZ (90.8%), had more than 10 years' experience (70.8%), and worked with a mixed case load (60.0%); 77.3% prescribed zero to ten foot orthoses per week, with FLWs used in 44% of prescriptions. Peroneal tendon injuries and chronic ankle instability were most likely to be treated with FLWs. The most common belief was that FLWs increase first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion (86.2%). The FLWs were regularly manufactured from 3-mm (73.8%), medium-density ethyl vinyl acetate (92.9%) and positioned from the calcaneocuboid joint (54.8%) to the sulcus (78.6%).

Conclusions: Podiatrists in NZ frequently use FLWs. These were generally manufactured from 3-mm, medium-density ethyl vinyl acetate and positioned from the calcaneocuboid joint to the sulcus. The most common rationales for use were to increase first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion, shift the center of pressure medially, and balance the foot. A discordance was found between the theories of foot function on which clinicians placed the greatest importance and the biomechanical outcomes they thought were being achieved. Survey data also highlighted inconsistency in the nomenclature used to describe FLW thickness and inclination.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 医学-整形外科

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

128

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.