Exploring Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Acute Pain Clinical Trials: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Ketamine Infusions for Sickle Cell Pain.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S507983
Martha O Kenney, Alexander T Limkakeng, Timothy N Ochoa, Joacy G Mathias, Mitchell R Knisely, Francis Keefe
{"title":"Exploring Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Acute Pain Clinical Trials: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Ketamine Infusions for Sickle Cell Pain.","authors":"Martha O Kenney, Alexander T Limkakeng, Timothy N Ochoa, Joacy G Mathias, Mitchell R Knisely, Francis Keefe","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S507983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vaso-occlusive events (VOEs) are the primary cause of acute pain in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD), where high-dose opioids are the current standard treatment. Ketamine, a non-opioid analgesic, holds potential for managing acute SCD due to its opioid-sparing properties. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to an inpatient clinical trial of ketamine infusion for treatment of acute SCD pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design integrated quantitative survey data from 70 sickle cell and emergency medicine clinicians with qualitative insights from 10 patient focus group participants. Survey responses (n = 77 total, including seven registered nurses) were analyzed descriptively and via Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-tests, while focus groups were thematically coded using themes from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinicians showed varied comfort levels with ketamine, with significant differences between sickle cell and emergency medicine clinicians. Barriers to future trials included the lack of standardized protocols (50.6%) and providers' attitudes regarding ketamine (32.5%). Patients cited trust in providers and potential health benefits as key facilitators but also expressed concerns about safety, confidentiality, and time commitment of trial participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Successful implementation of inpatient trials of pain interventions, such as ketamine infusions, requires a multidisciplinary approach, transparent communication about risks, strong clinical frameworks, and patient-centered trial designs. While study limitations, such as potential selection bias and low survey response rate, should be considered, these findings provide actionable insights to guide the design of future clinical trials and improve non-opioid pain management for SCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1465-1478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S507983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Vaso-occlusive events (VOEs) are the primary cause of acute pain in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD), where high-dose opioids are the current standard treatment. Ketamine, a non-opioid analgesic, holds potential for managing acute SCD due to its opioid-sparing properties. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to an inpatient clinical trial of ketamine infusion for treatment of acute SCD pain.

Methods: A mixed-methods design integrated quantitative survey data from 70 sickle cell and emergency medicine clinicians with qualitative insights from 10 patient focus group participants. Survey responses (n = 77 total, including seven registered nurses) were analyzed descriptively and via Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U-tests, while focus groups were thematically coded using themes from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results: Clinicians showed varied comfort levels with ketamine, with significant differences between sickle cell and emergency medicine clinicians. Barriers to future trials included the lack of standardized protocols (50.6%) and providers' attitudes regarding ketamine (32.5%). Patients cited trust in providers and potential health benefits as key facilitators but also expressed concerns about safety, confidentiality, and time commitment of trial participation.

Conclusion: Successful implementation of inpatient trials of pain interventions, such as ketamine infusions, requires a multidisciplinary approach, transparent communication about risks, strong clinical frameworks, and patient-centered trial designs. While study limitations, such as potential selection bias and low survey response rate, should be considered, these findings provide actionable insights to guide the design of future clinical trials and improve non-opioid pain management for SCD.

探索实施急性疼痛临床试验的感知障碍和促进因素:氯胺酮输注治疗镰状细胞性疼痛的混合方法分析。
目的:血管闭塞事件(VOEs)是镰状细胞病(SCD)患者急性疼痛的主要原因,大剂量阿片类药物是目前的标准治疗方法。氯胺酮是一种非阿片类镇痛药,由于其阿片类药物的特性,具有治疗急性SCD的潜力。本研究旨在探讨氯胺酮输注治疗急性SCD疼痛的住院临床试验的障碍和促进因素。方法:采用混合方法设计,整合了来自70名镰状细胞和急诊医学临床医生的定量调查数据,以及来自10名患者焦点小组参与者的定性见解。调查回复(n = 77,包括7名注册护士)通过Fisher精确检验和Mann-Whitney u检验进行描述性分析,而焦点小组使用实施研究统一框架的主题进行主题编码。结果:临床医生对氯胺酮表现出不同的舒适度,镰状细胞和急诊医学临床医生之间存在显著差异。未来试验的障碍包括缺乏标准化方案(50.6%)和提供者对氯胺酮的态度(32.5%)。患者认为对提供者的信任和潜在的健康益处是关键的促进因素,但也表达了对参与试验的安全性、保密性和时间承诺的担忧。结论:成功实施氯胺酮输注等疼痛干预的住院试验,需要多学科合作、透明的风险沟通、强有力的临床框架和以患者为中心的试验设计。虽然研究的局限性,如潜在的选择偏差和低调查回复率,应该考虑,这些发现提供了可操作的见解,指导未来临床试验的设计和改善非阿片类疼痛管理的SCD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信