Rhonda G Kost, Joseph Andrews, Ranee Chatterjee, Alex C Cheng, Lisa Connally, Ann Dozier, Carrie Dykes, Daniel Ford, Nancy S Green, Caroline Jiang, Sana Khoury-Shakour, Sierra Lindo, Karen Marder, Liz Martinez, Adam Qureshi, Jamie Roberts, Natalie Schlesinger
{"title":"What research participants say about their research experiences in Empowering the Participant Voice: Outcomes and actionable data.","authors":"Rhonda G Kost, Joseph Andrews, Ranee Chatterjee, Alex C Cheng, Lisa Connally, Ann Dozier, Carrie Dykes, Daniel Ford, Nancy S Green, Caroline Jiang, Sana Khoury-Shakour, Sierra Lindo, Karen Marder, Liz Martinez, Adam Qureshi, Jamie Roberts, Natalie Schlesinger","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research participants\" feedback about their participation experiences offers critical insights for improving programs. A shared Empowering the Participant Voice (EPV) infrastructure enabled a multiorganization collaborative to collect, analyze, and act on participants' feedback using validated participant-centered measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consortium of academic research organizations with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) programs administered the Research Participant Perception Survey (RPPS) to active or recent research participants. Local response data also aggregated into a Consortium database, facilitating analysis of feedback overall and for subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 2022 to June 2024, participating organizations sent surveys to 28,096 participants and received 5045 responses (18%). Respondents were 60% female, 80% White, 13% Black, 2% Asian, and 6% Latino/x. Most respondents (85-95%) felt respected and listened to by study staff; 68% gave their overall experience the top rating. Only 60% felt fully prepared by the consent process. Consent, feeling valued, language assistance, age, study demands, and other factors were significantly associated with overall experience ratings. 63% of participants said that receiving a summary of the study results would be very important to joining a future study. Intersite scores differed significantly for some measures; initiatives piloted in response to local findings raised experience scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RPPS results from 5045 participants from seven CTSAs provide a valuable evidence base for evaluating participants' research experiences and using participant feedback to improve research programs. Analyses revealed opportunities for improving research practices. Sites piloting local change initiatives based on RPPS findings demonstrated measurable positive impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Research participants" feedback about their participation experiences offers critical insights for improving programs. A shared Empowering the Participant Voice (EPV) infrastructure enabled a multiorganization collaborative to collect, analyze, and act on participants' feedback using validated participant-centered measures.
Methods: A consortium of academic research organizations with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) programs administered the Research Participant Perception Survey (RPPS) to active or recent research participants. Local response data also aggregated into a Consortium database, facilitating analysis of feedback overall and for subgroups.
Results: From February 2022 to June 2024, participating organizations sent surveys to 28,096 participants and received 5045 responses (18%). Respondents were 60% female, 80% White, 13% Black, 2% Asian, and 6% Latino/x. Most respondents (85-95%) felt respected and listened to by study staff; 68% gave their overall experience the top rating. Only 60% felt fully prepared by the consent process. Consent, feeling valued, language assistance, age, study demands, and other factors were significantly associated with overall experience ratings. 63% of participants said that receiving a summary of the study results would be very important to joining a future study. Intersite scores differed significantly for some measures; initiatives piloted in response to local findings raised experience scores.
Conclusion: RPPS results from 5045 participants from seven CTSAs provide a valuable evidence base for evaluating participants' research experiences and using participant feedback to improve research programs. Analyses revealed opportunities for improving research practices. Sites piloting local change initiatives based on RPPS findings demonstrated measurable positive impact.
背景:研究参与者对其参与经验的反馈为改进项目提供了重要的见解。一个共享的授权参与者声音(Empowering the Participant Voice, EPV)基础结构使多组织协作能够使用有效的以参与者为中心的度量来收集、分析参与者的反馈并对其采取行动。方法:一个拥有临床和转化科学奖(CTSA)项目的学术研究组织联盟对积极或最近的研究参与者进行了研究参与者感知调查(RPPS)。本地响应数据也汇总到一个联盟数据库中,便于对总体反馈和分组反馈进行分析。结果:从2022年2月到2024年6月,参与组织共向28,096名参与者发送了调查问卷,收到了5045份回复(18%)。受访者中女性占60%,白人占80%,黑人占13%,亚洲人占2%,拉丁裔占6%。大多数受访者(85-95%)感到受到研究人员的尊重和倾听;68%的人给他们的整体体验打了最高分。只有60%的人认为在同意过程中做好了充分的准备。同意、感觉被重视、语言帮助、年龄、学习需求和其他因素与总体体验评分显著相关。63%的参与者表示,收到研究结果的摘要对参加未来的研究非常重要。在某些测量中,站点间得分差异显著;根据当地调查结果试点的举措提高了经验得分。结论:来自7个CTSAs的5045名参与者的RPPS结果为评估参与者的研究经验和利用参与者反馈来改进研究计划提供了有价值的证据基础。分析揭示了改进研究实践的机会。试行基于RPPS调查结果的地方变革倡议的站点显示出可衡量的积极影响。