Identification of Borderline Personality Disorder in Adolescents: Psychometric Properties and Diagnostic Efficiency of a Juvenile Version of the Impulsivity and Emotion Dysregulation Scale (IES-27-J).
Maria Brede, Brigitte Dippold, Stephan Bender, Christoph Kröger, Maya Krischer
{"title":"Identification of Borderline Personality Disorder in Adolescents: Psychometric Properties and Diagnostic Efficiency of a Juvenile Version of the Impulsivity and Emotion Dysregulation Scale (IES-27-J).","authors":"Maria Brede, Brigitte Dippold, Stephan Bender, Christoph Kröger, Maya Krischer","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The diagnostic efficiency of screening instruments for adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)-that are applicable to its new classification in DSM-5 and ICD-11-has not yet been sufficiently studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the reliability and diagnostic efficiency of the juvenile version of the Impulsivity and Emotion Dysregulation Scale (IES-27-J) in a German-speaking sample of inpatient 12-19-year-old adolescents (N = 220, including n = 88 with BPD and n = 132 with other mental disorders). Using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, optimal cutoff values were determined for this self-report instrument. Analyses were conducted for two different diagnostic thresholds with at least four and five BPD diagnostic criteria, respectively, in accordance with the semi-structured clinical interview International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate that the IES-27-J is a reliable and valid instrument with moderate to high discriminative ability (areas under the curve [AUC] = 0.77 and 0.80, respectively). Using the preferred cutoff values, sensitivity (71% and 83%) and specificity (76% and 67%) turned out to be moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of the IES-27-J can be considered favorable in a two-stage approach, using a lower cutoff value in a first step to miss fewer patients with BPD, and conducting a clinical interview in a second step to confirm the diagnosis. More studies in different settings, including direct comparisons with other screening instruments, are necessary to further assess the clinical utility of the IES-27-J.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23792","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The diagnostic efficiency of screening instruments for adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)-that are applicable to its new classification in DSM-5 and ICD-11-has not yet been sufficiently studied.
Methods: We examined the reliability and diagnostic efficiency of the juvenile version of the Impulsivity and Emotion Dysregulation Scale (IES-27-J) in a German-speaking sample of inpatient 12-19-year-old adolescents (N = 220, including n = 88 with BPD and n = 132 with other mental disorders). Using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, optimal cutoff values were determined for this self-report instrument. Analyses were conducted for two different diagnostic thresholds with at least four and five BPD diagnostic criteria, respectively, in accordance with the semi-structured clinical interview International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE).
Results: Results indicate that the IES-27-J is a reliable and valid instrument with moderate to high discriminative ability (areas under the curve [AUC] = 0.77 and 0.80, respectively). Using the preferred cutoff values, sensitivity (71% and 83%) and specificity (76% and 67%) turned out to be moderate.
Conclusion: The application of the IES-27-J can be considered favorable in a two-stage approach, using a lower cutoff value in a first step to miss fewer patients with BPD, and conducting a clinical interview in a second step to confirm the diagnosis. More studies in different settings, including direct comparisons with other screening instruments, are necessary to further assess the clinical utility of the IES-27-J.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.