Jane K Maganga, Kristen Riley, Crispin Mukerebe, Loyce Mhango, Donald Miyaye, Peter Shigella, Myung Hee Lee, Humphrey D Mazigo, Jennifer A Downs, John M Changalucha
{"title":"Validation of rapid point-of-care tests for herpes simplex virus-type 2 in rural Tanzania.","authors":"Jane K Maganga, Kristen Riley, Crispin Mukerebe, Loyce Mhango, Donald Miyaye, Peter Shigella, Myung Hee Lee, Humphrey D Mazigo, Jennifer A Downs, John M Changalucha","doi":"10.1177/09564624251327241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHerpes simplex virus-type 2 (HSV-2) affects nearly 500 million people worldwide. Up to 70% of women in Tanzania are infected by age 30. Point-of-care (POC) tests to detect HSV-2 antibodies are commercially available. We validated the performance of two HSV-2 POC tests in women in rural Tanzania.MethodsBlood from 56 women was tested for HSV-2 antibodies by Biogate Labs and OnSite Duo rapid tests and Kalon HSV-2 IgG ELISA. Results obtained from the POC tests were compared with those from the ELISA to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV).ResultsThe Biogate had a sensitivity and specificity of 30.3% [15.6%-48.7%] and 100% [85.2%-100%], respectively. The OnSite Duo had a sensitivity and specificity of 69.7% [51.3%-84.4%] and 87.0% [66.4%-97.2%], respectively. The PPV and NPV for the Biogate was 100% [69.2%-100%] and 50% [44.4%-55.6%], respectively. The OnSite Duo had a PPV and NPV of 88.5% [72.3%-95.8%] and 66.7% [53.8%-77.5%], respectively.ConclusionThese tests had different performance characteristics, with the Biogate having a poor sensitivity and excellent specificity, and the OnSite Duo having a slightly better sensitivity though lower specificity. Validation of POC tests is important, as they can be valuable diagnostic tools in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"9564624251327241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251327241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundHerpes simplex virus-type 2 (HSV-2) affects nearly 500 million people worldwide. Up to 70% of women in Tanzania are infected by age 30. Point-of-care (POC) tests to detect HSV-2 antibodies are commercially available. We validated the performance of two HSV-2 POC tests in women in rural Tanzania.MethodsBlood from 56 women was tested for HSV-2 antibodies by Biogate Labs and OnSite Duo rapid tests and Kalon HSV-2 IgG ELISA. Results obtained from the POC tests were compared with those from the ELISA to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV).ResultsThe Biogate had a sensitivity and specificity of 30.3% [15.6%-48.7%] and 100% [85.2%-100%], respectively. The OnSite Duo had a sensitivity and specificity of 69.7% [51.3%-84.4%] and 87.0% [66.4%-97.2%], respectively. The PPV and NPV for the Biogate was 100% [69.2%-100%] and 50% [44.4%-55.6%], respectively. The OnSite Duo had a PPV and NPV of 88.5% [72.3%-95.8%] and 66.7% [53.8%-77.5%], respectively.ConclusionThese tests had different performance characteristics, with the Biogate having a poor sensitivity and excellent specificity, and the OnSite Duo having a slightly better sensitivity though lower specificity. Validation of POC tests is important, as they can be valuable diagnostic tools in low-resource settings.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).