Bactericidal activity of antibiotic combinations against clinical isolates of Enterococcus gallinarum and Enterococcus casseliflavus.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
David Landman, Meir Cherniak, Orit Gefen, Ayelet Michael-Gayego, Yair Motro, Jacob Moran-Gilad, Jacob Strahilevitz
{"title":"Bactericidal activity of antibiotic combinations against clinical isolates of Enterococcus gallinarum and Enterococcus casseliflavus.","authors":"David Landman, Meir Cherniak, Orit Gefen, Ayelet Michael-Gayego, Yair Motro, Jacob Moran-Gilad, Jacob Strahilevitz","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enterococcus gallinarum and Enterococcus casseliflavus are increasingly identified as causes of healthcare-associated infections. Although hepatobiliary infection and catheter-related bloodstream infection predominate, endovascular infection can also occur. The optimal treatment of these infections is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the in vitro activity of ampicillin, gentamicin and ceftriaxone against clinical isolates of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bloodstream isolates of E. gallinarum (n = 10) and E. casseliflavus (n = 8) were collected from unique patients between 2008 and 2022 at one institution. The activity of ampicillin was tested alone and combined with gentamicin and ceftriaxone by the time-kill method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All isolates were susceptible to ampicillin and none had gentamicin MIC > 128 mg/L. At concentrations of 0.25 × MIC, ampicillin plus gentamicin was synergistic against 5 of 10 E. gallinarum and all 8 E. casseliflavus, and was bactericidal against 12 of the 18 strains. In contrast, ampicillin plus ceftriaxone was synergistic and bactericidal against only 1 of 10 E. gallinarum and 0 of 8 E. casseliflavus. When the concentration of ampicillin was increased to 10 mg/L, above the MIC for all strains, the combination of ampicillin plus gentamicin was bactericidal against all isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that the ampicillin plus gentamicin combination is frequently synergistic and typically bactericidal and may be the preferred treatment option for endovascular infection caused by E. gallinarum or E. casseliflavus. In contrast to the findings for Enterococcus faecalis, ampicillin plus ceftriaxone is generally not synergistic or bactericidal and thus may not be as effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enterococcus gallinarum and Enterococcus casseliflavus are increasingly identified as causes of healthcare-associated infections. Although hepatobiliary infection and catheter-related bloodstream infection predominate, endovascular infection can also occur. The optimal treatment of these infections is unknown.

Objectives: To determine the in vitro activity of ampicillin, gentamicin and ceftriaxone against clinical isolates of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus.

Methods: Bloodstream isolates of E. gallinarum (n = 10) and E. casseliflavus (n = 8) were collected from unique patients between 2008 and 2022 at one institution. The activity of ampicillin was tested alone and combined with gentamicin and ceftriaxone by the time-kill method.

Results: All isolates were susceptible to ampicillin and none had gentamicin MIC > 128 mg/L. At concentrations of 0.25 × MIC, ampicillin plus gentamicin was synergistic against 5 of 10 E. gallinarum and all 8 E. casseliflavus, and was bactericidal against 12 of the 18 strains. In contrast, ampicillin plus ceftriaxone was synergistic and bactericidal against only 1 of 10 E. gallinarum and 0 of 8 E. casseliflavus. When the concentration of ampicillin was increased to 10 mg/L, above the MIC for all strains, the combination of ampicillin plus gentamicin was bactericidal against all isolates.

Conclusions: These data suggest that the ampicillin plus gentamicin combination is frequently synergistic and typically bactericidal and may be the preferred treatment option for endovascular infection caused by E. gallinarum or E. casseliflavus. In contrast to the findings for Enterococcus faecalis, ampicillin plus ceftriaxone is generally not synergistic or bactericidal and thus may not be as effective.

抗生素组合对鸡状肠球菌和casseliflavus肠球菌临床分离株的杀菌活性。
背景:鸡状肠球菌和casseliflavus肠球菌越来越多地被确定为卫生保健相关感染的原因。虽然以肝胆感染和导管相关血流感染为主,但也可发生血管内感染。这些感染的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。目的:测定氨苄西林、庆大霉素和头孢曲松对鸡大肠杆菌和casseliflavus临床分离株的体外抑菌活性。方法:从某医院2008年至2022年的特殊患者中分离出鸡肠杆菌(n = 10)和casseliflavus (n = 8)。用时效法测定氨苄西林单用及与庆大霉素、头孢曲松联用的活性。结果:所有分离株均对氨苄西林敏感,庆大霉素MIC≤128 mg/L。在0.25 × MIC浓度下,氨苄西林加庆大霉素对10株鸡大肠杆菌中的5株和8株casseliflavus均有增效作用,对18株大肠杆菌中的12株有杀菌作用。相比之下,氨苄西林加头孢曲松对10种鸡大肠杆菌和8种casseliflavus的增效和杀菌作用仅为1种。当氨苄西林浓度增加到10 mg/L,高于所有菌株的MIC时,氨苄西林加庆大霉素对所有菌株均有杀菌作用。结论:这些数据表明氨苄西林和庆大霉素联合使用通常具有协同作用,并且具有典型的杀菌作用,可能是鸡肠杆菌或casseliflavus引起的血管内感染的首选治疗方案。与粪肠球菌的研究结果相反,氨苄西林加头孢曲松通常没有协同作用或杀菌作用,因此可能效果不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信