Investigation of the Number of Oral Bacteria in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Asthma, and Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Toshiya Inui, Maya Tsuchiya, Takayasu Watanabe, Mitsuru Sada, Atsuto Mouri, Shinkichi Iwanari, Mitsuhiro Kamimura
{"title":"Investigation of the Number of Oral Bacteria in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Asthma, and Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap.","authors":"Toshiya Inui, Maya Tsuchiya, Takayasu Watanabe, Mitsuru Sada, Atsuto Mouri, Shinkichi Iwanari, Mitsuhiro Kamimura","doi":"10.2169/internalmedicine.4825-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Bacteria in the airways are reportedly involved in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. In addition, oral bacteria are thought to contribute to respiratory diseases by migrating to the airway. Therefore, we investigated whether or not the number of oral bacteria influences COPD, asthma, and asthma and COPD overlap (ACO). Methods We analyzed the correlations between the number of oral bacteria and clinical variables, such as pulmonary function tests, in patients with COPD, asthma, and ACO whose condition was stable and who visited our center from August 2019 to December 2020. The number of oral bacteria was assessed using the dielectrophoretic impedance measurement method. Results In patients with COPD (n = 50), the number of oral bacteria was significantly negatively correlated with the percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV<sub>1</sub>), percentage peak expiratory flow, and percentage forced vital capacity but was not correlated with the COPD Assessment Test. In patients with asthma (n = 32), it was significantly negatively correlated with the FEV<sub>1</sub> percentage and with the increase in FEV<sub>1</sub> in the reversibility test but not with fractional exhaled nitric oxide. In patients with ACO (n = 39), we found no significant correlation between the number of oral bacteria and any clinical variable. Conclusion The results suggest that the number of oral bacteria is associated with both lung capacity and airflow obstruction in patients with COPD and with airflow obstruction in patients with asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":13719,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.4825-24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Bacteria in the airways are reportedly involved in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. In addition, oral bacteria are thought to contribute to respiratory diseases by migrating to the airway. Therefore, we investigated whether or not the number of oral bacteria influences COPD, asthma, and asthma and COPD overlap (ACO). Methods We analyzed the correlations between the number of oral bacteria and clinical variables, such as pulmonary function tests, in patients with COPD, asthma, and ACO whose condition was stable and who visited our center from August 2019 to December 2020. The number of oral bacteria was assessed using the dielectrophoretic impedance measurement method. Results In patients with COPD (n = 50), the number of oral bacteria was significantly negatively correlated with the percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1), percentage peak expiratory flow, and percentage forced vital capacity but was not correlated with the COPD Assessment Test. In patients with asthma (n = 32), it was significantly negatively correlated with the FEV1 percentage and with the increase in FEV1 in the reversibility test but not with fractional exhaled nitric oxide. In patients with ACO (n = 39), we found no significant correlation between the number of oral bacteria and any clinical variable. Conclusion The results suggest that the number of oral bacteria is associated with both lung capacity and airflow obstruction in patients with COPD and with airflow obstruction in patients with asthma.

目的 据报道,气道中的细菌与慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)和哮喘的发病机制有关。此外,口腔细菌也被认为通过迁移到气道而导致呼吸道疾病。因此,我们研究了口腔细菌数量是否会影响慢性阻塞性肺病、哮喘以及哮喘与慢性阻塞性肺病重叠(ACO)。方法 我们分析了 2019 年 8 月至 2020 年 12 月期间到本中心就诊的病情稳定的 COPD、哮喘和 ACO 患者的口腔细菌数量与肺功能测试等临床变量之间的相关性。口腔细菌数量采用介电阻抗测量法进行评估。结果 在慢性阻塞性肺病患者(n = 50)中,口腔细菌数量与一秒内预测用力呼气容积百分比(%FEV1)、呼气峰值流量百分比和用力肺活量百分比呈显著负相关,但与慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试无关。在哮喘患者(32 人)中,它与 FEV1 百分比和可逆性测试中 FEV1 的增加呈显著负相关,但与呼出一氧化氮分数无关。在 ACO 患者(39 人)中,我们发现口腔细菌数量与任何临床变量之间均无明显相关性。结论 结果表明,口腔细菌数量与慢性阻塞性肺病患者的肺活量和气流阻塞有关,与哮喘患者的气流阻塞有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Internal Medicine is an open-access online only journal published monthly by the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Articles must be prepared in accordance with "The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (see Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 258-265, 1988), must be contributed solely to the Internal Medicine, and become the property of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Statements contained therein are the responsibility of the author(s). The Society reserves copyright and renewal on all published material and such material may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信