Comparing UK patients' experiences of NHS audiology care using a newly translated English version of the consumer quality index (CQI) 'audiology care' questionnaire.
IF 1.8 3区 医学Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Perindi Patel, Kevin J Munro, Jonathan O Parsons, Antonia Marsden, Antje Heinrich
{"title":"Comparing UK patients' experiences of NHS audiology care using a newly translated English version of the consumer quality index (CQI) <i>'audiology care'</i> questionnaire.","authors":"Perindi Patel, Kevin J Munro, Jonathan O Parsons, Antonia Marsden, Antje Heinrich","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2477037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Following the adaptation of a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) of \"Audiology Care\", based on the Consumer Quality Index (CQI), from a Dutch to a UK context, we compared patient experiences of the prescription and fitting process for first-time adult hearing aid (HA) users in two different venues affiliated to the same organisation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The adapted PREM consisted of 32 questions and 7 subscales.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>The PREM was posted to a group of 1821 NHS patients who had received a first HA fitting via a social enterprise within the past 12 months at either a Hospital or High Street venue. 967 (53%, 796 Hospital, 171 High Street) patients responded and were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For two out of seven subscales the mean patient ratings for the two venues showed statistically significant differences: \"Accommodation and Facilities\" and \"Waiting Times\". In both cases the differences were very small. Internal consistency of subscales ranged from 0.36-0.81 with only three subscales showing good or acceptable values: \"Conduct of Employees\", \"Expertise of Employees\" and \"Arranging Appointments\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This translated and adapted PREM can be a useful tool to standardise assessment and reporting of patient experiences of first-time HA users in the UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2477037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Following the adaptation of a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) of "Audiology Care", based on the Consumer Quality Index (CQI), from a Dutch to a UK context, we compared patient experiences of the prescription and fitting process for first-time adult hearing aid (HA) users in two different venues affiliated to the same organisation.
Design: The adapted PREM consisted of 32 questions and 7 subscales.
Study sample: The PREM was posted to a group of 1821 NHS patients who had received a first HA fitting via a social enterprise within the past 12 months at either a Hospital or High Street venue. 967 (53%, 796 Hospital, 171 High Street) patients responded and were included in the study.
Results: For two out of seven subscales the mean patient ratings for the two venues showed statistically significant differences: "Accommodation and Facilities" and "Waiting Times". In both cases the differences were very small. Internal consistency of subscales ranged from 0.36-0.81 with only three subscales showing good or acceptable values: "Conduct of Employees", "Expertise of Employees" and "Arranging Appointments".
Conclusion: This translated and adapted PREM can be a useful tool to standardise assessment and reporting of patient experiences of first-time HA users in the UK.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.