Orithea Z Regn, Ashley M Romero, Jennifer L Bouldin
{"title":"Light Emitting Diode (LED) light as an alternative to fluorescent for Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) organism reference toxicity testing and culturing.","authors":"Orithea Z Regn, Ashley M Romero, Jennifer L Bouldin","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the global transition from fluorescent to light emitting diode (LED) lights, there has been limited research to determine the impact of different light types on whole effluent toxicity (WET) test organisms. This study compared WET testing results, using sodium chloride as the reference toxicant, for Ceriodaphnia dubia, Daphnia magna, Daphnia pulex, and Pimephales promelas kept under fluorescent and LED lights. Inter-laboratory comparisons were made for acute and chronic C. dubia, acute D. pulex, and acute D. magna test results, where seasonality impacts were determined for all tests. One lab further evaluated culturing board effects over 12-week periods for C. dubia and D. magna and compared different LED light temperatures for C. dubia. Time of year differences were found with inconsistencies observed between labs. LED light temperature did not affect C. dubia culturing or WET test performance. In conclusion, LED lights are a viable alternative to fluorescent in WET testing except for chronic P. promelas and potentially chronic D. magna testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the global transition from fluorescent to light emitting diode (LED) lights, there has been limited research to determine the impact of different light types on whole effluent toxicity (WET) test organisms. This study compared WET testing results, using sodium chloride as the reference toxicant, for Ceriodaphnia dubia, Daphnia magna, Daphnia pulex, and Pimephales promelas kept under fluorescent and LED lights. Inter-laboratory comparisons were made for acute and chronic C. dubia, acute D. pulex, and acute D. magna test results, where seasonality impacts were determined for all tests. One lab further evaluated culturing board effects over 12-week periods for C. dubia and D. magna and compared different LED light temperatures for C. dubia. Time of year differences were found with inconsistencies observed between labs. LED light temperature did not affect C. dubia culturing or WET test performance. In conclusion, LED lights are a viable alternative to fluorescent in WET testing except for chronic P. promelas and potentially chronic D. magna testing.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.