Improving Methodologies for Cumulative Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Noncarcinogenic Health Risks from Volatile Organic Compounds in Fenceline Communities in Southeastern Pennsylvania.

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Health Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1289/EHP14696
Andrea A Chiger, Carolyn Gigot, Ellis S Robinson, Mina W Tehrani, Megan Claflin, Edward Fortner, Harald Stark, Jordan Krechmer, Manjula R Canagaratna, Scott Herndon, Tara I Yacovitch, Kirsten Koehler, Ana M Rule, Thomas A Burke, Mary A Fox, Peter F DeCarlo, Keeve E Nachman
{"title":"Improving Methodologies for Cumulative Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Noncarcinogenic Health Risks from Volatile Organic Compounds in Fenceline Communities in Southeastern Pennsylvania.","authors":"Andrea A Chiger, Carolyn Gigot, Ellis S Robinson, Mina W Tehrani, Megan Claflin, Edward Fortner, Harald Stark, Jordan Krechmer, Manjula R Canagaratna, Scott Herndon, Tara I Yacovitch, Kirsten Koehler, Ana M Rule, Thomas A Burke, Mary A Fox, Peter F DeCarlo, Keeve E Nachman","doi":"10.1289/EHP14696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cumulative risk assessment (CRA) is key to characterizing health risks in fenceline and disadvantaged communities, which face environmental pollution and challenging socioeconomic conditions. Traditional approaches for inclusion of mixtures in CRA are limited and only assess the most sensitive target organ system for each chemical.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed an expanded approach to cumulative risk assessment that considers all known target organ systems associated with a chemical. Specifically, we created a multi-effects toxicity database by <i>a</i>) compiling toxicological and epidemiological data from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's (ATSDR) Toxicological Profiles and the Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) CompTox Chemicals Dashboard; <i>b</i>) developing a tiering system to prioritize identified data for use in developing toxicity values; and <i>c</i>) accounting for uncertainty to create toxicity values for additional target organ systems. We demonstrated differences between the traditional approach and our expanded approach by using state-of-the-art mobile monitoring data from our Southeastern Pennsylvania Hazardous Air Pollutant Monitoring and Assessment Project (SEPA HAP-MAP) to conduct a cumulative risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 32 chemicals quantified in SEPA HAP-MAP, 28 were represented in our multi-effects toxicity database, whereas only 16 were included using a traditional approach. In total, we derived toxicity values for 172 chemical-target organ system combinations. Our expanded approach found neurological, renal, respiratory, endocrine, and systemic risks (hazard index <math><mrow><mo>></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></math>) in SEPA HAP-MAP fenceline communities, whereas no risks were identified using a traditional approach limited to the most sensitive target organ systems only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that traditional approaches to CRA underestimate health risks in fenceline and other highly exposed communities and highlight the need for improved methods to inform health-protective and just risk management decisions. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14696.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":"57004"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cumulative risk assessment (CRA) is key to characterizing health risks in fenceline and disadvantaged communities, which face environmental pollution and challenging socioeconomic conditions. Traditional approaches for inclusion of mixtures in CRA are limited and only assess the most sensitive target organ system for each chemical.

Methods: We developed an expanded approach to cumulative risk assessment that considers all known target organ systems associated with a chemical. Specifically, we created a multi-effects toxicity database by a) compiling toxicological and epidemiological data from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's (ATSDR) Toxicological Profiles and the Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) CompTox Chemicals Dashboard; b) developing a tiering system to prioritize identified data for use in developing toxicity values; and c) accounting for uncertainty to create toxicity values for additional target organ systems. We demonstrated differences between the traditional approach and our expanded approach by using state-of-the-art mobile monitoring data from our Southeastern Pennsylvania Hazardous Air Pollutant Monitoring and Assessment Project (SEPA HAP-MAP) to conduct a cumulative risk assessment.

Results: Of the 32 chemicals quantified in SEPA HAP-MAP, 28 were represented in our multi-effects toxicity database, whereas only 16 were included using a traditional approach. In total, we derived toxicity values for 172 chemical-target organ system combinations. Our expanded approach found neurological, renal, respiratory, endocrine, and systemic risks (hazard index >1) in SEPA HAP-MAP fenceline communities, whereas no risks were identified using a traditional approach limited to the most sensitive target organ systems only.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that traditional approaches to CRA underestimate health risks in fenceline and other highly exposed communities and highlight the need for improved methods to inform health-protective and just risk management decisions. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14696.

累积风险评估方法的改进:宾夕法尼亚州东南部围栏社区挥发性有机化合物非致癌健康风险案例研究
背景:累积风险评估(CRA)是描述围栏和弱势社区健康风险的关键,这些社区面临环境污染和具有挑战性的社会经济条件。将混合物纳入CRA的传统方法是有限的,并且只能评估每种化学物质最敏感的靶器官系统。方法:我们开发了一种扩展的累积风险评估方法,考虑了与化学物质相关的所有已知目标器官系统。具体来说,我们通过以下方式创建了一个多效应毒性数据库:1)从有毒物质和疾病登记处(ATSDR)的毒理学概况和环境保护局(EPA)的CompTox化学品仪表板中收集毒理学和流行病学数据;2)制定一个分级系统,优先考虑已确定的数据,用于制定毒性值;3)考虑不确定性,为其他目标器官系统创建毒性值。通过使用来自宾夕法尼亚州东南部有害空气污染物监测和评估项目(SEPA HAP-MAP)的最先进的移动监测数据进行累积风险评估,我们展示了传统方法与扩展方法之间的差异。结果:在SEPA HAP-MAP量化的32种化学物质中,有28种被纳入我们的多效应毒性数据库,而传统方法仅包括16种。总的来说,我们得出了172种化学靶器官系统组合的毒性值。我们的扩展方法在SEPA HAP-MAP围栏社区中发现了神经、肾脏、呼吸、内分泌和全身风险(危害指数>1),而使用传统方法仅局限于最敏感的靶器官系统没有发现风险。结论:我们的研究结果表明,传统的CRA方法低估了围栏和其他高暴露社区的健康风险,并强调需要改进方法,为健康保护和公正的风险管理决策提供信息。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14696。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信