Simon J Hickman, Lucy Givens, Joanna M Jefferis, Irene M Pepper, Martin J Rhodes
{"title":"Evaluating semi-automated kinetic perimetry in persons with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.","authors":"Simon J Hickman, Lucy Givens, Joanna M Jefferis, Irene M Pepper, Martin J Rhodes","doi":"10.1177/11206721251329982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThis study aimed to assess whether semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) enables the quantitation and monitoring of visual field loss in persons with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (PWIIH).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of newly diagnosed PWIIH. We recorded baseline clinical data and optic disc modified Frisén grade from fundal photographs. The SKP software calculated the I4e and I2e isopter areas and the I4e target plotted blind spot areas. This was recorded for each eye at baseline and for each study visit for up to 1 year.ResultsBoth the baseline I4e isopter (F = 44.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and I2e isopter areas (F = 37.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were significantly related to baseline visual acuity. The baseline blind spot area was significantly related to modified Frisén grade (F = 22.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant linear relationship between either the I4e isopter (F = 0.06; <i>p</i> = 0.939) or I2e isopter areas (F = 0.06, <i>p</i> = 0.807) and the time since diagnosis. There was, however a significant linear decrease in mean blind spot area over time (F = 46.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionsThe relationships at baseline between I4e and I2e isopter areas and visual acuity show that SKP provides clinically meaningful results at presentation in PWIIH. Our results suggest that it is less useful for monitoring recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1761-1766"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251329982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThis study aimed to assess whether semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) enables the quantitation and monitoring of visual field loss in persons with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (PWIIH).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of newly diagnosed PWIIH. We recorded baseline clinical data and optic disc modified Frisén grade from fundal photographs. The SKP software calculated the I4e and I2e isopter areas and the I4e target plotted blind spot areas. This was recorded for each eye at baseline and for each study visit for up to 1 year.ResultsBoth the baseline I4e isopter (F = 44.1, p < 0.001) and I2e isopter areas (F = 37.1, p < 0.001) were significantly related to baseline visual acuity. The baseline blind spot area was significantly related to modified Frisén grade (F = 22.0, p < 0.001). There was no significant linear relationship between either the I4e isopter (F = 0.06; p = 0.939) or I2e isopter areas (F = 0.06, p = 0.807) and the time since diagnosis. There was, however a significant linear decrease in mean blind spot area over time (F = 46.6, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe relationships at baseline between I4e and I2e isopter areas and visual acuity show that SKP provides clinically meaningful results at presentation in PWIIH. Our results suggest that it is less useful for monitoring recovery.
本研究旨在评估半自动动态视野测量(SKP)是否能够定量和监测特发性颅内高压(PWIIH)患者的视野丧失。方法对新诊断的pwih进行回顾性分析。我们记录了基线临床数据和眼底照片中视盘改良的frisen分级。SKP软件计算了I4e和I2e等波区域,I4e目标绘制了盲点区域。记录每只眼睛在基线时的情况,并记录长达1年的每次研究访问的情况。结果基线I4e等差值(F = 44.1, p = 0.939)和I2e等差值面积(F = 0.06, p = 0.807)与诊断时间均有差异。然而,随着时间的推移,平均盲点面积呈显著的线性下降(F = 46.6, p
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.