Does Manual Acupuncture Improve Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms? A Trial Sequential Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Jinjin Yin, Ming Yin, Tianwen Liu, Shumin Qin
{"title":"Does Manual Acupuncture Improve Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms? A Trial Sequential Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jinjin Yin, Ming Yin, Tianwen Liu, Shumin Qin","doi":"10.1159/000544956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of acupuncture in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been previously investigated; however, it is unclear whether manual acupuncture is effective for treating GERD. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of manual acupuncture in treating GERD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Potentially eligible studies were identified from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Registry for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (Sinomed). Sensitivity analysis was conducted through excluding low-quality studies. Subgroup analysis was performed according to different proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and treatment duration. Certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 504 records, 12 relevant studies were included in our meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis confirmed that manual acupuncture improved symptom scores (mean difference [MD] = -3.43, 95% CI = -5.14 to -1.73, I2 = 88%, p < 0.001, very low evidence) and reduced recurrence rates (risk ratio [RR] = 0.32, 95% confidence interval = 0.16 to 0.64, I2 = 0%, p = 0.001, very low evidence). Although meta-analysis showed no difference in adverse events between manual acupuncture and PPIs (RR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.09 to 1.58, I2 = 0%, p = 0.18, very low evidence), TSA revealed extremely insufficient statistical power. Furthermore, the global symptom improvement rate was lower with acupuncture compared to PPIs (RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.30, I2 = 18%, p < 0.001, low evidence). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the results. Subgroup analysis suggested the therapeutic effects of manual acupuncture alone irrespective of categories of PPIs and treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Manual acupuncture has the potential to alleviate the severity of symptoms and decrease the recurrence rate in patients with GERD. However, considering the efficacy of PPI therapy in significantly improving overall symptoms, along with its established safety profile and extensive clinical utilization over the years, we do not recommend manual acupuncture alone as the primary treatment for patients with GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10541,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Medicine Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The role of acupuncture in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been previously investigated; however, it is unclear whether manual acupuncture is effective for treating GERD. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of manual acupuncture in treating GERD.

Methods: Potentially eligible studies were identified from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Registry for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (Sinomed). Sensitivity analysis was conducted through excluding low-quality studies. Subgroup analysis was performed according to different proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and treatment duration. Certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.

Results: Based on 504 records, 12 relevant studies were included in our meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis confirmed that manual acupuncture improved symptom scores (mean difference [MD] = -3.43, 95% CI = -5.14 to -1.73, I2 = 88%, p < 0.001, very low evidence) and reduced recurrence rates (risk ratio [RR] = 0.32, 95% confidence interval = 0.16 to 0.64, I2 = 0%, p = 0.001, very low evidence). Although meta-analysis showed no difference in adverse events between manual acupuncture and PPIs (RR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.09 to 1.58, I2 = 0%, p = 0.18, very low evidence), TSA revealed extremely insufficient statistical power. Furthermore, the global symptom improvement rate was lower with acupuncture compared to PPIs (RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.30, I2 = 18%, p < 0.001, low evidence). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the results. Subgroup analysis suggested the therapeutic effects of manual acupuncture alone irrespective of categories of PPIs and treatment duration.

Conclusion: Manual acupuncture has the potential to alleviate the severity of symptoms and decrease the recurrence rate in patients with GERD. However, considering the efficacy of PPI therapy in significantly improving overall symptoms, along with its established safety profile and extensive clinical utilization over the years, we do not recommend manual acupuncture alone as the primary treatment for patients with GERD.

手针灸能改善胃食管反流病的症状吗?试验序贯荟萃分析。
导读:针灸在治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)中的作用已经被研究过;然而,目前尚不清楚手工针灸对治疗反流是否有效。本研究旨在评价手针刺治疗胃食管反流的有效性和安全性。方法:从PubMed、Embase、Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心(Central)、中国知网(CNKI)和中国生物医学文献数据库(Sinomed)中筛选出可能符合条件的研究。通过排除低质量研究进行敏感性分析。根据不同质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)和治疗时间进行亚组分析。使用建议、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)框架对证据的确定性进行评级。结果:基于504份记录,我们的meta分析纳入了12项相关研究。试验序贯分析证实,手工针刺可改善症状评分(mean difference [MD]=-3.43, 95% CI=-5.14 ~ -1.73, I2=88%)。结论:手工针刺可减轻胃食管反流患者的症状严重程度,降低复发率。然而,考虑到PPI治疗在显著改善整体症状方面的有效性,以及其已建立的安全性和多年来广泛的临床应用,我们不建议单独使用手动针灸作为胃食管反流患者的主要治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary Medicine Research
Complementary Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope ''Complementary Medicine Research'' is an international journal that aims to bridge the gap between conventional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) on a sound scientific basis, promoting their mutual integration. Accordingly, experts of both conventional medicine and CAM medicine cooperate on the journal‘s editorial board, which accepts papers only after a rigorous peer-review process in order to maintain a high standard of scientific quality. Spectrum of ''Complementary Medicine Research'': - Review and Original Articles, Case Reports and Essays regarding complementary practice and methods - Journal Club: Analysis and discussion of internationally published articles in complementary medicine - Editorials of leading experts in complementary medicine - Questions of complementary patient-centered care - Education in complementary medicine - Reports on important meetings and conferences - Society Bulletins of Schweizerische Medizinische Gesellschaft für Phytotherapie (SMGP) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Naturheilkunde Bibliographic Details Complementary Medicine Research Journal Abbreviation: Complement Med Res ISSN: 2504-2092 (Print) e-ISSN: 2504-2106 (Online) DOI: 10.1159/issn.2504-2092 www.karger.com/CMR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信