Exploring the impact of glycemic variability on clinical outcomes in critically ill cerebral infarction patients.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Hui Yang, Hongcai Wang, Yan Jiang
{"title":"Exploring the impact of glycemic variability on clinical outcomes in critically ill cerebral infarction patients.","authors":"Hui Yang, Hongcai Wang, Yan Jiang","doi":"10.1186/s13098-025-01676-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glycemic variability (GV) is a key determinant of outcomes in critically ill patients, yet its impact on cerebral infarction patients in intensive care units (ICUs) remains underexplored. This study evaluates the association between GV and clinical outcomes, including discharge outcomes, 90-day and 1-year mortality, and ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study of 778 cerebral infarction patients from the MIMIC-IV database assessed GV, calculated as the glucose standard deviation-to-mean ratio during ICU stays. Regression models evaluated GV's impact on discharge outcomes, mortality, and ICU/hospital LOS, with adjustments for confounders. Restricted cubic spline analyses identified risk thresholds, while sensitivity and subgroup analyses validated findings. Predictive performance was assessed using AUC, NRI, and IDI, and multiple imputation methods addressed missing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher GV was significantly linked to adverse outcomes. Patients in the highest GV quartile had increased risks of poor discharge outcomes (adjusted OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.03-3.32; P = 0.042), 90-day mortality (adjusted HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.03-2.22; P = 0.036), and 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07-2.18; P = 0.018). RCS analysis identified critical GV thresholds (≥ 11% for 90-day and ≥ 10% for 1-year mortality). Subgroup analysis revealed stronger associations between GV and poor outcomes in non-diabetic patients (adjusted OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.24-2.88; P = 0.003) compared to diabetic patients (adjusted OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.53-1.25; P = 0.337). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings across imputation methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GV independently predicts poor outcomes in ICU cerebral infarction patients. Integrating GV metrics into clinical workflows may improve risk stratification and guide interventions. Future research should validate these findings and explore strategies to reduce GV.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"17 1","pages":"100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01676-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glycemic variability (GV) is a key determinant of outcomes in critically ill patients, yet its impact on cerebral infarction patients in intensive care units (ICUs) remains underexplored. This study evaluates the association between GV and clinical outcomes, including discharge outcomes, 90-day and 1-year mortality, and ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS).

Methods: This retrospective study of 778 cerebral infarction patients from the MIMIC-IV database assessed GV, calculated as the glucose standard deviation-to-mean ratio during ICU stays. Regression models evaluated GV's impact on discharge outcomes, mortality, and ICU/hospital LOS, with adjustments for confounders. Restricted cubic spline analyses identified risk thresholds, while sensitivity and subgroup analyses validated findings. Predictive performance was assessed using AUC, NRI, and IDI, and multiple imputation methods addressed missing data.

Results: Higher GV was significantly linked to adverse outcomes. Patients in the highest GV quartile had increased risks of poor discharge outcomes (adjusted OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.03-3.32; P = 0.042), 90-day mortality (adjusted HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.03-2.22; P = 0.036), and 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07-2.18; P = 0.018). RCS analysis identified critical GV thresholds (≥ 11% for 90-day and ≥ 10% for 1-year mortality). Subgroup analysis revealed stronger associations between GV and poor outcomes in non-diabetic patients (adjusted OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.24-2.88; P = 0.003) compared to diabetic patients (adjusted OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.53-1.25; P = 0.337). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings across imputation methods.

Conclusions: GV independently predicts poor outcomes in ICU cerebral infarction patients. Integrating GV metrics into clinical workflows may improve risk stratification and guide interventions. Future research should validate these findings and explore strategies to reduce GV.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信