Dose the deep learning-based iterative reconstruction affect the measuring accuracy of bone mineral density in low dose chest CT?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hui Hao, Jiayin Tong, Shijie Xu, Jingyi Wang, Ningning Ding, Zhe Liu, Wenzhe Zhao, Xin Huang, Yanshou Li, Chao Jin, Jian Yang
{"title":"Dose the deep learning-based iterative reconstruction affect the measuring accuracy of bone mineral density in low dose chest CT?","authors":"Hui Hao, Jiayin Tong, Shijie Xu, Jingyi Wang, Ningning Ding, Zhe Liu, Wenzhe Zhao, Xin Huang, Yanshou Li, Chao Jin, Jian Yang","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the impacts of a deep learning-based iterative reconstruction algorithm on image quality and measuring accuracy of bone mineral density (BMD) in low dose chest CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phantom and patient studies were separately conducted in this study. The same low dose protocol was used for phantoms and patients. All images were reconstructed with filter back projection, hybrid iterative reconstruction (KARL, level of 3,5,7), and deep learning-based iterative reconstruction (AIIR, low, medium and high-strength). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and the task-based transfer function (TTF) were evaluated using phantom. The accuracy and the relative error (RE) of BMD were evaluated using a European spine phantom. The subjective evaluation was performed by two experienced radiologists. BMD was measured using QCT. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, BMD values and subjective scores were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Cohen's kappa test was used to evaluate the inter-reader and inter-group agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AIIR reduced noise and improved resolution in phantom images significantly. There were no significant differences among BMD values in all groups of images (all p > 0.05). RE of BMD measured with AIIR images were smaller. In objective evaluation, all strengths of AIIR achieved less image noise, higher SNR and CNR (all p < 0.05). AIIR-H showed the lowest noise, highest SNR and CNR (p < 0.05). The increase of AIIR algorithm strengths did not affect BMD values significantly (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The deep learning-based iterative reconstruction did not affect the accuracy of BMD measurement with Low-dose chest CT, while reducing image noise and improving spatial resolution.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The BMD values could be measured accurately in low-dose chest CT with deep learning-based iterative reconstruction, while reducing image noise and improving spatial resolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the impacts of a deep learning-based iterative reconstruction algorithm on image quality and measuring accuracy of bone mineral density (BMD) in low dose chest CT.

Methods: Phantom and patient studies were separately conducted in this study. The same low dose protocol was used for phantoms and patients. All images were reconstructed with filter back projection, hybrid iterative reconstruction (KARL, level of 3,5,7), and deep learning-based iterative reconstruction (AIIR, low, medium and high-strength). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and the task-based transfer function (TTF) were evaluated using phantom. The accuracy and the relative error (RE) of BMD were evaluated using a European spine phantom. The subjective evaluation was performed by two experienced radiologists. BMD was measured using QCT. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, BMD values and subjective scores were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Cohen's kappa test was used to evaluate the inter-reader and inter-group agreement.

Results: AIIR reduced noise and improved resolution in phantom images significantly. There were no significant differences among BMD values in all groups of images (all p > 0.05). RE of BMD measured with AIIR images were smaller. In objective evaluation, all strengths of AIIR achieved less image noise, higher SNR and CNR (all p < 0.05). AIIR-H showed the lowest noise, highest SNR and CNR (p < 0.05). The increase of AIIR algorithm strengths did not affect BMD values significantly (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The deep learning-based iterative reconstruction did not affect the accuracy of BMD measurement with Low-dose chest CT, while reducing image noise and improving spatial resolution.

Advances in knowledge: The BMD values could be measured accurately in low-dose chest CT with deep learning-based iterative reconstruction, while reducing image noise and improving spatial resolution.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信