Prophylactic proton pump inhibitor usage and new-onset acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfaf037
Jing Xu, Zhoucang Zhang, Yujing Pan, Xue Li, Jiaxiang Ding, Mei Wang
{"title":"Prophylactic proton pump inhibitor usage and new-onset acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Jing Xu, Zhoucang Zhang, Yujing Pan, Xue Li, Jiaxiang Ding, Mei Wang","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfaf037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, the potential association between prophylactic PPIs and the development of new-onset acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients without AKI or end-stage renal disease and not undergoing renal replacement therapy upon admission to the ICU were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database. The exposure factor for the study was the initiation of prophylactic PPIs within 48 h of admission, with the primary outcome being the occurrence of new-onset AKI after 48 h. Multivariable regression models were employed to investigate the association between prophylactic PPIs and the risk of new-onset AKI. Various propensity score analyses, along with stratified and subgroup analyses and E-value calculations, were conducted to further evaluate the reliability of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7498 ICU patients were analyzed. The multivariable analysis showed a higher incidence of new-onset AKI in the PPI group (30.7%) compared with the control group (24.1%), yielding an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.43 (95% confidence interval 1.22-1.67). Propensity score analyses confirmed these results, with ORs ranging from 1.34 to 1.49 (<i>P</i> ≤ .005). Results from multiple sensitivity analyses further supported these findings, with an E-value of 2.34 indicating robustness against unmeasured confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prophylactic PPI use is associated with an increased risk of new-onset AKI in ICU patients. Indiscriminate use of PPIs should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"18 3","pages":"sfaf037"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, the potential association between prophylactic PPIs and the development of new-onset acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unclear.

Methods: Patients without AKI or end-stage renal disease and not undergoing renal replacement therapy upon admission to the ICU were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database. The exposure factor for the study was the initiation of prophylactic PPIs within 48 h of admission, with the primary outcome being the occurrence of new-onset AKI after 48 h. Multivariable regression models were employed to investigate the association between prophylactic PPIs and the risk of new-onset AKI. Various propensity score analyses, along with stratified and subgroup analyses and E-value calculations, were conducted to further evaluate the reliability of the results.

Results: A total of 7498 ICU patients were analyzed. The multivariable analysis showed a higher incidence of new-onset AKI in the PPI group (30.7%) compared with the control group (24.1%), yielding an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.43 (95% confidence interval 1.22-1.67). Propensity score analyses confirmed these results, with ORs ranging from 1.34 to 1.49 (P ≤ .005). Results from multiple sensitivity analyses further supported these findings, with an E-value of 2.34 indicating robustness against unmeasured confounders.

Conclusions: Prophylactic PPI use is associated with an increased risk of new-onset AKI in ICU patients. Indiscriminate use of PPIs should be avoided.

预防性质子泵抑制剂的使用与危重患者新发急性肾损伤的回顾性分析。
背景:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)被广泛用于重症监护病房(ICU)患者的应激性溃疡预防(SUP)。然而,预防性PPIs与新发急性肾损伤(AKI)之间的潜在关联尚不清楚。方法:从重症监护医学信息市场(MIMIC-IV)数据库中确定无AKI或终末期肾脏疾病且入院时未接受肾脏替代治疗的患者。本研究的暴露因素是入院后48小时内开始使用预防性PPIs,主要结局是48小时后发生新发AKI。采用多变量回归模型研究预防性PPIs与新发AKI风险之间的关系。我们进行了各种倾向得分分析、分层和亚组分析以及e值计算,以进一步评估结果的可靠性。结果:共分析了7498例ICU患者。多变量分析显示,PPI组新发AKI发生率(30.7%)高于对照组(24.1%),校正优势比(OR)为1.43(95%可信区间1.22-1.67)。倾向评分分析证实了这些结果,or范围为1.34 ~ 1.49 (P≤0.005)。多重敏感性分析的结果进一步支持了这些发现,e值为2.34表明对未测量混杂因素的稳健性。结论:预防性PPI使用与ICU患者新发AKI风险增加相关。应避免滥用质子泵抑制剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信