Establishment of a deep-learning-assisted recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma detecting simultaneous tactic (DARNDEST) with high cost-effectiveness based on magnetic resonance images: a multicenter study in an endemic area.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yishu Deng, Yingying Huang, Haijun Wu, Dongxia He, Wenze Qiu, Bingzhong Jing, Xing Lv, Weixiong Xia, Bin Li, Ying Sun, Chaofeng Li, Chuanmiao Xie, Liangru Ke
{"title":"Establishment of a deep-learning-assisted recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma detecting simultaneous tactic (DARNDEST) with high cost-effectiveness based on magnetic resonance images: a multicenter study in an endemic area.","authors":"Yishu Deng, Yingying Huang, Haijun Wu, Dongxia He, Wenze Qiu, Bingzhong Jing, Xing Lv, Weixiong Xia, Bin Li, Ying Sun, Chaofeng Li, Chuanmiao Xie, Liangru Ke","doi":"10.1186/s40644-025-00853-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of detecting local recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) using unenhanced magnetic resonance images (MRI) and optimize a layered management strategy for follow-up with a deep learning model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Deep learning models based on 3D DenseNet or ResNet frames using unique sequence (T1WI, T2WI, or T1WIC) or a combination of T1WI and T2WI sequences (T1_T2) were developed to detect local rNPC. A deep-learning-assisted recurrent NPC detecting simultaneous tactic (DARNDEST) utilized DenseNet was optimized by superimposing the T1WIC model over the T1_T2 model in a specific population. Diagnostic efficacy (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity) and examination cost of a single MR scan were compared among the conventional method, T1_T2 model, and DARNDEST using McNemar's Z test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were found between the T1WIC model and T1WI, T2WI, or T1_T2 models in both test sets (all P > 0.0167). The DARNDEST had higher accuracy and sensitivity but lower specificity than the T1_T2 model in both the internal (accuracy, 85.91% vs. 84.99%; sensitivity, 90.36% vs. 84.26%; specificity, 82.20% vs. 85.59%) and external (accuracy, 86.14% vs. 84.16%; sensitivity, 90.32% vs. 84.95%; specificity, 82.57% vs. 83.49%) test sets. The cost of a single MR examination using DARNDEST was $330,724 (internal) and $328,971 (external) with a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients, relative to $313,250 of the T1_T2 model and $340,865 of the conventional method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Detecting local rNPC using unenhanced MRI with deep learning is feasible and DARNDEST-driven follow-up management is efficient and economic.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00853-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate the feasibility of detecting local recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) using unenhanced magnetic resonance images (MRI) and optimize a layered management strategy for follow-up with a deep learning model.

Methods: Deep learning models based on 3D DenseNet or ResNet frames using unique sequence (T1WI, T2WI, or T1WIC) or a combination of T1WI and T2WI sequences (T1_T2) were developed to detect local rNPC. A deep-learning-assisted recurrent NPC detecting simultaneous tactic (DARNDEST) utilized DenseNet was optimized by superimposing the T1WIC model over the T1_T2 model in a specific population. Diagnostic efficacy (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity) and examination cost of a single MR scan were compared among the conventional method, T1_T2 model, and DARNDEST using McNemar's Z test.

Results: No significant differences in overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were found between the T1WIC model and T1WI, T2WI, or T1_T2 models in both test sets (all P > 0.0167). The DARNDEST had higher accuracy and sensitivity but lower specificity than the T1_T2 model in both the internal (accuracy, 85.91% vs. 84.99%; sensitivity, 90.36% vs. 84.26%; specificity, 82.20% vs. 85.59%) and external (accuracy, 86.14% vs. 84.16%; sensitivity, 90.32% vs. 84.95%; specificity, 82.57% vs. 83.49%) test sets. The cost of a single MR examination using DARNDEST was $330,724 (internal) and $328,971 (external) with a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients, relative to $313,250 of the T1_T2 model and $340,865 of the conventional method.

Conclusions: Detecting local rNPC using unenhanced MRI with deep learning is feasible and DARNDEST-driven follow-up management is efficient and economic.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信