Comparing fondaparinux and low molecular weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Muhammad Hassan Waseem, Zain Ul Abideen, Nohela Rehman, Sarosh Ali, Esha Dilawar, Haseeb Javed Khan, Burhan Khalid, Muhammad Ansab, Sania Aimen, Areehah Zafar Masood
{"title":"Comparing fondaparinux and low molecular weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Muhammad Hassan Waseem, Zain Ul Abideen, Nohela Rehman, Sarosh Ali, Esha Dilawar, Haseeb Javed Khan, Burhan Khalid, Muhammad Ansab, Sania Aimen, Areehah Zafar Masood","doi":"10.1097/MBC.0000000000001352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality despite the availability of prophylactic medications. There has been a debate about which thromboprophylaxis medication, Fondaparinux or low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), is better after hip and knee arthroplasty. We have compared these two treatment regimens in our study. Electronic databases like PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to August 2024. The weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes were pooled using the Review Manager software version 5.4.1, and a random effects model was employed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (ROB 2.0) were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Publication bias was evaluated visually through funnel plots and statistically through Egger's regression. GRADE assessment was used to analyze the certainty of evidence. A total of 17 studies, 9 Cohorts, and 8 Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) pooling a total of 74 499 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Fondaparinux showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of VTE [0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.48, 0.71]; P < 0.00001; I2 = 36%] and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: [0.56, 1.00]; P = 0.05; I2 = 68%) compared to LMWH. Major bleeding (RR = 2.06, 95% CI: [1.19, 3.57]; P = 0.01; I2 = 43%), surgical site bleeding (RR = 1.67, 95% CI: [1.04, 2.66]; P = 0.03; I2 = 9%), and postoperative transfusions (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: [1.02, 1.12]; P = 0.004; I2 = 0%) were significantly higher in the Fondaparinux group. Symptomatic VTE, pulmonary embolism, mortality, and operating time showed no significant difference between the two groups. In conclusion, Fondaparinux is superior to LMWH in VTE and DVT prophylaxis. However, it is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding, surgical site bleeding, and postoperative transfusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8992,"journal":{"name":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality despite the availability of prophylactic medications. There has been a debate about which thromboprophylaxis medication, Fondaparinux or low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), is better after hip and knee arthroplasty. We have compared these two treatment regimens in our study. Electronic databases like PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to August 2024. The weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes were pooled using the Review Manager software version 5.4.1, and a random effects model was employed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (ROB 2.0) were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Publication bias was evaluated visually through funnel plots and statistically through Egger's regression. GRADE assessment was used to analyze the certainty of evidence. A total of 17 studies, 9 Cohorts, and 8 Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) pooling a total of 74 499 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Fondaparinux showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of VTE [0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.48, 0.71]; P < 0.00001; I2 = 36%] and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: [0.56, 1.00]; P = 0.05; I2 = 68%) compared to LMWH. Major bleeding (RR = 2.06, 95% CI: [1.19, 3.57]; P = 0.01; I2 = 43%), surgical site bleeding (RR = 1.67, 95% CI: [1.04, 2.66]; P = 0.03; I2 = 9%), and postoperative transfusions (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: [1.02, 1.12]; P = 0.004; I2 = 0%) were significantly higher in the Fondaparinux group. Symptomatic VTE, pulmonary embolism, mortality, and operating time showed no significant difference between the two groups. In conclusion, Fondaparinux is superior to LMWH in VTE and DVT prophylaxis. However, it is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding, surgical site bleeding, and postoperative transfusions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis is an international fully refereed journal that features review and original research articles on all clinical, laboratory and experimental aspects of haemostasis and thrombosis. The journal is devoted to publishing significant developments worldwide in the field of blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, thrombosis, platelets and the kininogen-kinin system, as well as dealing with those aspects of blood rheology relevant to haemostasis and the effects of drugs on haemostatic components
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信