{"title":"Temporal constraints on leaf-level trait plasticity for next-generation land surface models.","authors":"A Odé, N G Smith, K T Rebel, H J de Boer","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) are essential for quantifying the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the Earth's climate system, but struggle with uncertainty and complexity. Eco-evolutionary optimality (EEO) theory provides a promising approach to improve DGVMs based on the premise that leaf carbon gain is optimized with resource costs. However, the timescales at which plant traits can adjust to environmental changes are not yet systematically incorporated in EEO-based models. Our aims were to identify temporal constraints on key leaf photosynthetic and leaf functional traits, and develop a conceptual framework for incorporation of temporal leaf trait dynamics in EEO-based models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed scientific literature on temporal responses of leaf traits associated with stomata and hydraulics, photosynthetic biochemistry, and morphology and lifespan. Subsequent response times were categorized from fast to slow considering physiological, phenotypical (acclimation), and evolutionary (adaptation) mechanisms. We constructed a conceptual framework including several key leaf traits identified from the literature review. We considered temporal separation of dynamics in the leaf interior to atmospheric CO2 concentration (ci:ca) from the optimal ci:ca ratio χ(optimal), and dynamics in stomatal conductance within the constraint of the anatomical maximum stomatal conductance (gsmax). A proof-of-concept was provided by modelling temporally-separated responses in these trait combinations to CO2 and humidity.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We identified 15 leaf traits crucial for EEO-based modelling and determined their response mechanisms and timescales. Physiological and phenotypical response mechanisms were considered most relevant for modelling EEO-based trait dynamics, while evolutionary constraints limit response ranges. Our conceptual framework demonstrated an approach to separate near-instantaneous physiological responses in ci:ca from week-scale phenotypic responses in χ(optimal), and to separate minute-scale physiological responses in stomatal conductance from annual-scale phenotypic responses in gsmax.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We highlight an opportunity to constrain leaf trait dynamics in EEO-based models based on physiological, phenotypical and evolutionary response mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) are essential for quantifying the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the Earth's climate system, but struggle with uncertainty and complexity. Eco-evolutionary optimality (EEO) theory provides a promising approach to improve DGVMs based on the premise that leaf carbon gain is optimized with resource costs. However, the timescales at which plant traits can adjust to environmental changes are not yet systematically incorporated in EEO-based models. Our aims were to identify temporal constraints on key leaf photosynthetic and leaf functional traits, and develop a conceptual framework for incorporation of temporal leaf trait dynamics in EEO-based models.
Methods: We reviewed scientific literature on temporal responses of leaf traits associated with stomata and hydraulics, photosynthetic biochemistry, and morphology and lifespan. Subsequent response times were categorized from fast to slow considering physiological, phenotypical (acclimation), and evolutionary (adaptation) mechanisms. We constructed a conceptual framework including several key leaf traits identified from the literature review. We considered temporal separation of dynamics in the leaf interior to atmospheric CO2 concentration (ci:ca) from the optimal ci:ca ratio χ(optimal), and dynamics in stomatal conductance within the constraint of the anatomical maximum stomatal conductance (gsmax). A proof-of-concept was provided by modelling temporally-separated responses in these trait combinations to CO2 and humidity.
Key results: We identified 15 leaf traits crucial for EEO-based modelling and determined their response mechanisms and timescales. Physiological and phenotypical response mechanisms were considered most relevant for modelling EEO-based trait dynamics, while evolutionary constraints limit response ranges. Our conceptual framework demonstrated an approach to separate near-instantaneous physiological responses in ci:ca from week-scale phenotypic responses in χ(optimal), and to separate minute-scale physiological responses in stomatal conductance from annual-scale phenotypic responses in gsmax.
Conclusions: We highlight an opportunity to constrain leaf trait dynamics in EEO-based models based on physiological, phenotypical and evolutionary response mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide.
The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.