Family-Related Motivation and Regret Intensity Among Family Liver Donors by Type of Family Relationship.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Ye Sol Lee, Chin Kang Koh, Nam-Joon Yi
{"title":"Family-Related Motivation and Regret Intensity Among Family Liver Donors by Type of Family Relationship.","authors":"Ye Sol Lee, Chin Kang Koh, Nam-Joon Yi","doi":"10.12659/AOT.947414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from a family member, particularly adult children, is common in South Korea. Although LDLT is restricted to donors with altruistic motivations, some still experience post-donation regret. However, the role of family-related motivation in post-donation regret remains underexplored. This study examined whether family-related motivations were associated with regret intensity and whether these associations varied by the type of family relationship (child vs spouse, sibling, or parent donors). MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was a cross-sectional secondary analysis. The sample comprised 124 postoperative living liver donors. They completed a family-related motivation subscale of the Donor Motivation Questionnaire and a single-item measure of regret intensity. For moderation analysis, Model 1 of the PROCESS macro was used. RESULTS The mean score of post-donation regret was 1.3 out of 4. Non-child donors reported higher levels of regret than child donors. Particularly in non-child donors, family-related motivation was inversely associated with regret intensity, after adjusting for age, sex, caregiver role, postoperative complications, and months since donation. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that child and non-child donors have distinct motivations, which are linked to differing levels of regret. Accordingly, transplant teams should provide tailored information and support services based on the donor's family relationship type.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e947414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.947414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from a family member, particularly adult children, is common in South Korea. Although LDLT is restricted to donors with altruistic motivations, some still experience post-donation regret. However, the role of family-related motivation in post-donation regret remains underexplored. This study examined whether family-related motivations were associated with regret intensity and whether these associations varied by the type of family relationship (child vs spouse, sibling, or parent donors). MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was a cross-sectional secondary analysis. The sample comprised 124 postoperative living liver donors. They completed a family-related motivation subscale of the Donor Motivation Questionnaire and a single-item measure of regret intensity. For moderation analysis, Model 1 of the PROCESS macro was used. RESULTS The mean score of post-donation regret was 1.3 out of 4. Non-child donors reported higher levels of regret than child donors. Particularly in non-child donors, family-related motivation was inversely associated with regret intensity, after adjusting for age, sex, caregiver role, postoperative complications, and months since donation. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that child and non-child donors have distinct motivations, which are linked to differing levels of regret. Accordingly, transplant teams should provide tailored information and support services based on the donor's family relationship type.

不同家庭关系类型的家庭捐肝者家庭动机与后悔强度。
背景:来自家庭成员,特别是成年子女的活体肝移植(LDLT)在韩国很常见。尽管LDLT仅限于具有利他动机的捐赠者,但一些人仍然会经历捐赠后的后悔。然而,家庭相关动机在捐赠后后悔中的作用仍未得到充分探讨。这项研究考察了与家庭相关的动机是否与后悔强度有关,以及这些联系是否因家庭关系类型(子女与配偶、兄弟姐妹或父母捐赠者)而异。材料与方法本研究为横断面二次分析。样本包括124例术后活体肝供体。他们完成了捐赠动机问卷中与家庭相关的动机子量表和后悔强度的单项测量。为了进行适度分析,使用PROCESS宏的模型1。结果捐献后后悔平均得分为1.3分(满分4分)。非儿童献血者的后悔程度高于儿童献血者。特别是在非儿童捐赠者中,在调整了年龄、性别、照顾者角色、术后并发症和捐赠后的时间后,与家庭相关的动机与后悔强度呈负相关。结论:这些发现表明,儿童和非儿童捐赠者有不同的动机,这与不同程度的后悔有关。因此,移植团队应该根据捐赠者的家庭关系类型提供量身定制的信息和支持服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation. Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication. Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信