Umar Rehman, Natasha Polglase, David Kahn, Teoman Dogan, Santdeep Paun, Alwyn D'Souza, Rajan Uppal, Nick Eynon-Lewis, Matt Lechner
{"title":"Bridging the Gap in Rhinoplasty Training: The Effectiveness of 3D-Printed Models in Surgical Education.","authors":"Umar Rehman, Natasha Polglase, David Kahn, Teoman Dogan, Santdeep Paun, Alwyn D'Souza, Rajan Uppal, Nick Eynon-Lewis, Matt Lechner","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rhinoplasty is a common facial plastic surgery (FPS) procedure for both functional and aesthetic indications. The use of 3D models has been reported as a potential method to provide hands-on training for learning rhinoplasty without jeopardizing patient care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to develop and validate a novel model that can be used for rhinoplasty training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The rhinoplasty models were designed and produced using proprietary 3D printing technology. Face and content validity were assessed during a rhinoplasty course involving 53 surgeons. Whilst, criterion validity was evaluated in a training session with 20 surgical residents, measuring improvements in surgical skills after using the 3D models with an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSAT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All surgeons (n=53, 100%) stated that the rhinoplasty model aided in their learning and development. 91% (n=48) of surgeons rated the realism of the model as excellent or very good in comparison to cadaveric specimens. Assessment of criterion validity showed a statistically significant improvement in OSAT scores among surgical residents, increasing from a baseline of 11.7/40 (SD ± 1.80) to 21.6/40 (SD ± 1.79) post session (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 3D rhinoplasty models showed good content, face, and criterion validity, objectively improving residents' surgical performance. Rhinoplasty 3D models could serve as a pre-cadaveric training adjunct, equipping trainees with fundamental skills before cadaveric dissection, or as a primary training modality in countries with limited cadaver access. Thus, the models offer an innovative approach to training the next generation of rhinoplasty surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Rhinoplasty is a common facial plastic surgery (FPS) procedure for both functional and aesthetic indications. The use of 3D models has been reported as a potential method to provide hands-on training for learning rhinoplasty without jeopardizing patient care.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a novel model that can be used for rhinoplasty training.
Methods: The rhinoplasty models were designed and produced using proprietary 3D printing technology. Face and content validity were assessed during a rhinoplasty course involving 53 surgeons. Whilst, criterion validity was evaluated in a training session with 20 surgical residents, measuring improvements in surgical skills after using the 3D models with an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSAT).
Results: All surgeons (n=53, 100%) stated that the rhinoplasty model aided in their learning and development. 91% (n=48) of surgeons rated the realism of the model as excellent or very good in comparison to cadaveric specimens. Assessment of criterion validity showed a statistically significant improvement in OSAT scores among surgical residents, increasing from a baseline of 11.7/40 (SD ± 1.80) to 21.6/40 (SD ± 1.79) post session (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: The 3D rhinoplasty models showed good content, face, and criterion validity, objectively improving residents' surgical performance. Rhinoplasty 3D models could serve as a pre-cadaveric training adjunct, equipping trainees with fundamental skills before cadaveric dissection, or as a primary training modality in countries with limited cadaver access. Thus, the models offer an innovative approach to training the next generation of rhinoplasty surgeons.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.