Optimization and Process Validation of Freeze-Structured Meat Substitute Using Machine Learning Models

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
V. Chitra Devi, R. Devanampriyan, D. Kayethri, R. Sankari, J. Premalatha, R. Sathish Raam, S. Mothil
{"title":"Optimization and Process Validation of Freeze-Structured Meat Substitute Using Machine Learning Models","authors":"V. Chitra Devi,&nbsp;R. Devanampriyan,&nbsp;D. Kayethri,&nbsp;R. Sankari,&nbsp;J. Premalatha,&nbsp;R. Sathish Raam,&nbsp;S. Mothil","doi":"10.1111/jfpe.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The increasing demand for sustainable and healthy food sources has catalyzed the rapid expansion of the meat substitute market. Legumes have been offering significant nutritional advantages and making them a superior choice for meat substitutes due to their advantages in protein quality. Legume composites such as pea protein isolate (PPI) and isolated soy protein (ISP) and vital wheat gluten combine with other ingredients to create a fibrous texture. A mixture design approach was employed to optimize the formulation with freeze structuring methodology; machine learning (ML) models were integrated to predict the textural and sensory properties of the resulting meat analogues. The final samples were tested for textural, water activity, sensory properties, and water activity, which is used to validate the consistency of the experimental formulations. The optimized formulation, consisting of 18.9% PPI, 12.6% ISP, and 8.5% VWG, exhibited a hardness of 815.587 N, springiness of 0.845 mm, overall acceptability of 8.7, and water activity of 0.887. Integrating five ML algorithms for built-in feature selection and classification mechanisms predicted the desired properties. The predicted values from the ML models closely matched the experimental results, demonstrating the potential of this approach with a negligible amount of difference in experimental values. Among the ML models tested, Gradient Boosting provided the best prediction for hardness (RMSE = 24.698, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.986), AdaBoost performed best for springiness (RMSE = 0.019, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.940) and overall acceptability (RMSE = 0.284, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.904), while XGBoost showed the highest accuracy for water activity prediction (RMSE = 0.002, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.985). In conclusion, the integration of both approaches emphasizes the importance of reducing dimensionality and enhancing data quality, and this research serves as a platform for future work studies in the field of plant-based meat alternatives.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","volume":"48 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable and healthy food sources has catalyzed the rapid expansion of the meat substitute market. Legumes have been offering significant nutritional advantages and making them a superior choice for meat substitutes due to their advantages in protein quality. Legume composites such as pea protein isolate (PPI) and isolated soy protein (ISP) and vital wheat gluten combine with other ingredients to create a fibrous texture. A mixture design approach was employed to optimize the formulation with freeze structuring methodology; machine learning (ML) models were integrated to predict the textural and sensory properties of the resulting meat analogues. The final samples were tested for textural, water activity, sensory properties, and water activity, which is used to validate the consistency of the experimental formulations. The optimized formulation, consisting of 18.9% PPI, 12.6% ISP, and 8.5% VWG, exhibited a hardness of 815.587 N, springiness of 0.845 mm, overall acceptability of 8.7, and water activity of 0.887. Integrating five ML algorithms for built-in feature selection and classification mechanisms predicted the desired properties. The predicted values from the ML models closely matched the experimental results, demonstrating the potential of this approach with a negligible amount of difference in experimental values. Among the ML models tested, Gradient Boosting provided the best prediction for hardness (RMSE = 24.698, R2 = 0.986), AdaBoost performed best for springiness (RMSE = 0.019, R2 = 0.940) and overall acceptability (RMSE = 0.284, R2 = 0.904), while XGBoost showed the highest accuracy for water activity prediction (RMSE = 0.002, R2 = 0.985). In conclusion, the integration of both approaches emphasizes the importance of reducing dimensionality and enhancing data quality, and this research serves as a platform for future work studies in the field of plant-based meat alternatives.

基于机器学习模型的冷冻结构肉类替代品优化及工艺验证
对可持续和健康食品来源的日益增长的需求催化了肉类替代品市场的迅速扩张。豆类具有显著的营养优势,由于其蛋白质质量的优势,使其成为肉类替代品的最佳选择。豆类复合材料,如豌豆分离蛋白(PPI)、分离大豆蛋白(ISP)和重要的小麦面筋,与其他成分结合,形成纤维状质地。采用混合设计方法,采用冻结结构法对配方进行优化;整合机器学习(ML)模型来预测所得肉类类似物的纹理和感官特性。最终样品进行了质地、水活度、感官性能和水活度测试,用于验证实验配方的一致性。优化后的配方由18.9% PPI、12.6% ISP和8.5% VWG组成,其硬度为815.587 N,弹性为0.845 mm,总体可接受度为8.7,水活度为0.887。集成五种机器学习算法,用于内置特征选择和分类机制,预测所需的属性。机器学习模型的预测值与实验结果非常吻合,证明了这种方法的潜力,实验值的差异可以忽略不计。在ML模型中,Gradient Boosting对硬度(RMSE = 24.698, R2 = 0.986)、AdaBoost对弹性(RMSE = 0.019, R2 = 0.940)和总体可接受度(RMSE = 0.284, R2 = 0.904)的预测效果最好,XGBoost对水活度的预测效果最好(RMSE = 0.002, R2 = 0.985)。综上所述,两种方法的整合强调了降维和提高数据质量的重要性,本研究为未来植物性肉类替代品领域的工作研究提供了平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Journal of Food Process Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
259
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: This international research journal focuses on the engineering aspects of post-production handling, storage, processing, packaging, and distribution of food. Read by researchers, food and chemical engineers, and industry experts, this is the only international journal specifically devoted to the engineering aspects of food processing. Co-Editors M. Elena Castell-Perez and Rosana Moreira, both of Texas A&M University, welcome papers covering the best original research on applications of engineering principles and concepts to food and food processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信