Optimization and Process Validation of Freeze-Structured Meat Substitute Using Machine Learning Models

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
V. Chitra Devi, R. Devanampriyan, D. Kayethri, R. Sankari, J. Premalatha, R. Sathish Raam, S. Mothil
{"title":"Optimization and Process Validation of Freeze-Structured Meat Substitute Using Machine Learning Models","authors":"V. Chitra Devi,&nbsp;R. Devanampriyan,&nbsp;D. Kayethri,&nbsp;R. Sankari,&nbsp;J. Premalatha,&nbsp;R. Sathish Raam,&nbsp;S. Mothil","doi":"10.1111/jfpe.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The increasing demand for sustainable and healthy food sources has catalyzed the rapid expansion of the meat substitute market. Legumes have been offering significant nutritional advantages and making them a superior choice for meat substitutes due to their advantages in protein quality. Legume composites such as pea protein isolate (PPI) and isolated soy protein (ISP) and vital wheat gluten combine with other ingredients to create a fibrous texture. A mixture design approach was employed to optimize the formulation with freeze structuring methodology; machine learning (ML) models were integrated to predict the textural and sensory properties of the resulting meat analogues. The final samples were tested for textural, water activity, sensory properties, and water activity, which is used to validate the consistency of the experimental formulations. The optimized formulation, consisting of 18.9% PPI, 12.6% ISP, and 8.5% VWG, exhibited a hardness of 815.587 N, springiness of 0.845 mm, overall acceptability of 8.7, and water activity of 0.887. Integrating five ML algorithms for built-in feature selection and classification mechanisms predicted the desired properties. The predicted values from the ML models closely matched the experimental results, demonstrating the potential of this approach with a negligible amount of difference in experimental values. Among the ML models tested, Gradient Boosting provided the best prediction for hardness (RMSE = 24.698, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.986), AdaBoost performed best for springiness (RMSE = 0.019, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.940) and overall acceptability (RMSE = 0.284, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.904), while XGBoost showed the highest accuracy for water activity prediction (RMSE = 0.002, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.985). In conclusion, the integration of both approaches emphasizes the importance of reducing dimensionality and enhancing data quality, and this research serves as a platform for future work studies in the field of plant-based meat alternatives.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","volume":"48 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable and healthy food sources has catalyzed the rapid expansion of the meat substitute market. Legumes have been offering significant nutritional advantages and making them a superior choice for meat substitutes due to their advantages in protein quality. Legume composites such as pea protein isolate (PPI) and isolated soy protein (ISP) and vital wheat gluten combine with other ingredients to create a fibrous texture. A mixture design approach was employed to optimize the formulation with freeze structuring methodology; machine learning (ML) models were integrated to predict the textural and sensory properties of the resulting meat analogues. The final samples were tested for textural, water activity, sensory properties, and water activity, which is used to validate the consistency of the experimental formulations. The optimized formulation, consisting of 18.9% PPI, 12.6% ISP, and 8.5% VWG, exhibited a hardness of 815.587 N, springiness of 0.845 mm, overall acceptability of 8.7, and water activity of 0.887. Integrating five ML algorithms for built-in feature selection and classification mechanisms predicted the desired properties. The predicted values from the ML models closely matched the experimental results, demonstrating the potential of this approach with a negligible amount of difference in experimental values. Among the ML models tested, Gradient Boosting provided the best prediction for hardness (RMSE = 24.698, R2 = 0.986), AdaBoost performed best for springiness (RMSE = 0.019, R2 = 0.940) and overall acceptability (RMSE = 0.284, R2 = 0.904), while XGBoost showed the highest accuracy for water activity prediction (RMSE = 0.002, R2 = 0.985). In conclusion, the integration of both approaches emphasizes the importance of reducing dimensionality and enhancing data quality, and this research serves as a platform for future work studies in the field of plant-based meat alternatives.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Journal of Food Process Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
259
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: This international research journal focuses on the engineering aspects of post-production handling, storage, processing, packaging, and distribution of food. Read by researchers, food and chemical engineers, and industry experts, this is the only international journal specifically devoted to the engineering aspects of food processing. Co-Editors M. Elena Castell-Perez and Rosana Moreira, both of Texas A&M University, welcome papers covering the best original research on applications of engineering principles and concepts to food and food processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信