{"title":"Inconsistencies, inaccuracies, and inappropriateness: examining the representation of Chinese students in university archives with radical empathy","authors":"Ruohua Han, Yingying Han","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09479-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aims to understand how Chinese international students are represented in university archives and the elements that can impact representation problems. We adopted radical empathy as a guiding principle to explore how 124 Chinese students at the University of Illinois (enrolled from 1904 to 1920) were represented in the university’s archival collections. Based on a qualitative inquiry, we found that inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and inappropriateness (three “I”s) in both original archival materials and archives-supplied access tools are the major representation issues of Chinese students that can negatively impact discovery and user engagement. These issues are grounded in a complex, holistic “ecosystem” of interplaying agents (e.g., students as information producers and archivists who mediate access), structural conditions, and documentation processes. Representation is affected by challenging conditions such as the complexities of recording Chinese names in English across different sources and the lack of resources for archival institutions to create more culturally sensitive access tools. We argue that reflecting on subtle marginalization, systemic issues, and the power of names and encouraging a slow praxis of radical empathy is critical to understanding representation issues and developing thoughtful remediation strategies. This study is one of the earliest projects to apply radical empathy to examining representation issues of Asian communities in English archival collections. The three “I”s and the elements that contribute to their presence constitute an original framework that can guide efforts to address representation problems of Chinese communities and other marginalized groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09479-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper aims to understand how Chinese international students are represented in university archives and the elements that can impact representation problems. We adopted radical empathy as a guiding principle to explore how 124 Chinese students at the University of Illinois (enrolled from 1904 to 1920) were represented in the university’s archival collections. Based on a qualitative inquiry, we found that inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and inappropriateness (three “I”s) in both original archival materials and archives-supplied access tools are the major representation issues of Chinese students that can negatively impact discovery and user engagement. These issues are grounded in a complex, holistic “ecosystem” of interplaying agents (e.g., students as information producers and archivists who mediate access), structural conditions, and documentation processes. Representation is affected by challenging conditions such as the complexities of recording Chinese names in English across different sources and the lack of resources for archival institutions to create more culturally sensitive access tools. We argue that reflecting on subtle marginalization, systemic issues, and the power of names and encouraging a slow praxis of radical empathy is critical to understanding representation issues and developing thoughtful remediation strategies. This study is one of the earliest projects to apply radical empathy to examining representation issues of Asian communities in English archival collections. The three “I”s and the elements that contribute to their presence constitute an original framework that can guide efforts to address representation problems of Chinese communities and other marginalized groups.
期刊介绍:
Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context