Inconsistencies, inaccuracies, and inappropriateness: examining the representation of Chinese students in university archives with radical empathy

IF 1.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Ruohua Han, Yingying Han
{"title":"Inconsistencies, inaccuracies, and inappropriateness: examining the representation of Chinese students in university archives with radical empathy","authors":"Ruohua Han,&nbsp;Yingying Han","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09479-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aims to understand how Chinese international students are represented in university archives and the elements that can impact representation problems. We adopted radical empathy as a guiding principle to explore how 124 Chinese students at the University of Illinois (enrolled from 1904 to 1920) were represented in the university’s archival collections. Based on a qualitative inquiry, we found that inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and inappropriateness (three “I”s) in both original archival materials and archives-supplied access tools are the major representation issues of Chinese students that can negatively impact discovery and user engagement. These issues are grounded in a complex, holistic “ecosystem” of interplaying agents (e.g., students as information producers and archivists who mediate access), structural conditions, and documentation processes. Representation is affected by challenging conditions such as the complexities of recording Chinese names in English across different sources and the lack of resources for archival institutions to create more culturally sensitive access tools. We argue that reflecting on subtle marginalization, systemic issues, and the power of names and encouraging a slow praxis of radical empathy is critical to understanding representation issues and developing thoughtful remediation strategies. This study is one of the earliest projects to apply radical empathy to examining representation issues of Asian communities in English archival collections. The three “I”s and the elements that contribute to their presence constitute an original framework that can guide efforts to address representation problems of Chinese communities and other marginalized groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09479-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to understand how Chinese international students are represented in university archives and the elements that can impact representation problems. We adopted radical empathy as a guiding principle to explore how 124 Chinese students at the University of Illinois (enrolled from 1904 to 1920) were represented in the university’s archival collections. Based on a qualitative inquiry, we found that inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and inappropriateness (three “I”s) in both original archival materials and archives-supplied access tools are the major representation issues of Chinese students that can negatively impact discovery and user engagement. These issues are grounded in a complex, holistic “ecosystem” of interplaying agents (e.g., students as information producers and archivists who mediate access), structural conditions, and documentation processes. Representation is affected by challenging conditions such as the complexities of recording Chinese names in English across different sources and the lack of resources for archival institutions to create more culturally sensitive access tools. We argue that reflecting on subtle marginalization, systemic issues, and the power of names and encouraging a slow praxis of radical empathy is critical to understanding representation issues and developing thoughtful remediation strategies. This study is one of the earliest projects to apply radical empathy to examining representation issues of Asian communities in English archival collections. The three “I”s and the elements that contribute to their presence constitute an original framework that can guide efforts to address representation problems of Chinese communities and other marginalized groups.

本文旨在了解中国留学生在大学档案中的代表情况,以及可能影响代表问题的因素。我们以激进的同理心为指导原则,探讨了伊利诺伊大学的 124 名中国留学生(入学时间为 1904 年至 1920 年)是如何在该校的档案收藏中得到体现的。基于定性调查,我们发现原始档案材料和档案馆提供的访问工具中的不准确、不一致和不恰当(三个 "I")是中国学生的主要表现问题,会对发现和用户参与产生负面影响。这些问题的根源在于一个复杂的、整体的 "生态系统",其中包括相互影响的主体(如作为信息生产者的学生和作为利用中介的档案工作者)、结构条件和记录过程。代表性受到各种挑战性条件的影响,例如在不同来源中用英文记录中文姓名的复杂性,以及档案机构缺乏资源来创建更具文化敏感性的访问工具。我们认为,反思微妙的边缘化、系统性问题和姓名的力量,并鼓励缓慢的激进移情实践,对于理解代表性问题和制定深思熟虑的补救策略至关重要。本研究是最早将激进同理心应用于研究英国档案收藏中的亚裔群体代表性问题的项目之一。三个 "I "以及导致其存在的因素构成了一个原创框架,可指导解决华人社区和其他边缘群体的代表性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信