Role of tick infestation in the progression of Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in lambs

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
M. Groenevelt , S.R. Wijburg , H. Sprong , K. Kerkhof , S. Stuen
{"title":"Role of tick infestation in the progression of Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in lambs","authors":"M. Groenevelt ,&nbsp;S.R. Wijburg ,&nbsp;H. Sprong ,&nbsp;K. Kerkhof ,&nbsp;S. Stuen","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2025.102477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tick Borne Fever (TBF) is a serious health condition in sheep, caused by infection with <em>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em>. When secondary bacterial infections occur in TBF, it can progress to tick pyemia, a condition causing severe morbidity and mortality in flocks. The mechanisms that underly the severe effects of tick pyemia are not fully understood. Here, we hypothesized that tick bites during an established <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> bacteremia could aggravate immunosuppression, increasing the risk of secondary infections. In this study, four groups of four lambs were compared based on their clinical and hematological outcomes. Group A received an intravenous injection of <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> on day 0. Group AT received the same injection on day 0, followed by tick placement on their backs on day 4. Group T was exposed only to tick placement on day 4, while Group C received no treatment. The animals were clinically and hematologically assessed over 28 days, and ticks collected off their backs after feeding were analyzed. Both clinically and hematologically, no additional detrimental effects were seen in Group AT compared to Group A. All lambs in Group T also developed TBF, but their clinical and hematological outcomes were less severe than those in Groups A and AT. Serologically, all animals responded similarly, corresponding to the day of exposure to <em>A. phagocytophilum</em>. PCR results showed no significant differences among groups, although duration of follow-up may have influenced the results, as only Group AT lambs remained PCR positive on the final testing day. When ticks that fed on Group AT lambs were compared to either ticks fed on Group T lambs or unengorged ticks harvested from the same fields, it became clear that sheep act as amplifier hosts for <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> in ticks shortly after exposure to infected ticks<em>.</em> Among the unengorged ticks, 10.2 % were infected with <em>A. phagocytophilum</em>, compared to 67 % and 99.2 % of the engorged ticks from Groups T and AT, respectively. In contrast to <em>A. phagocytophilum</em>, sheep were refractory hosts for <em>Borrelia burgdorferi</em> s.l., as the percentage of infected ticks was 10.2 % in the unengorged ticks and only 1 and 1.7 % in engorged ticks from groups T and AT, respectively. In this study, additional tick bites did not contribute to immunosuppression in lambs during an established <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> bacteremia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"16 3","pages":"Article 102477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X2500041X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tick Borne Fever (TBF) is a serious health condition in sheep, caused by infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum. When secondary bacterial infections occur in TBF, it can progress to tick pyemia, a condition causing severe morbidity and mortality in flocks. The mechanisms that underly the severe effects of tick pyemia are not fully understood. Here, we hypothesized that tick bites during an established A. phagocytophilum bacteremia could aggravate immunosuppression, increasing the risk of secondary infections. In this study, four groups of four lambs were compared based on their clinical and hematological outcomes. Group A received an intravenous injection of A. phagocytophilum on day 0. Group AT received the same injection on day 0, followed by tick placement on their backs on day 4. Group T was exposed only to tick placement on day 4, while Group C received no treatment. The animals were clinically and hematologically assessed over 28 days, and ticks collected off their backs after feeding were analyzed. Both clinically and hematologically, no additional detrimental effects were seen in Group AT compared to Group A. All lambs in Group T also developed TBF, but their clinical and hematological outcomes were less severe than those in Groups A and AT. Serologically, all animals responded similarly, corresponding to the day of exposure to A. phagocytophilum. PCR results showed no significant differences among groups, although duration of follow-up may have influenced the results, as only Group AT lambs remained PCR positive on the final testing day. When ticks that fed on Group AT lambs were compared to either ticks fed on Group T lambs or unengorged ticks harvested from the same fields, it became clear that sheep act as amplifier hosts for A. phagocytophilum in ticks shortly after exposure to infected ticks. Among the unengorged ticks, 10.2 % were infected with A. phagocytophilum, compared to 67 % and 99.2 % of the engorged ticks from Groups T and AT, respectively. In contrast to A. phagocytophilum, sheep were refractory hosts for Borrelia burgdorferi s.l., as the percentage of infected ticks was 10.2 % in the unengorged ticks and only 1 and 1.7 % in engorged ticks from groups T and AT, respectively. In this study, additional tick bites did not contribute to immunosuppression in lambs during an established A. phagocytophilum bacteremia.

Abstract Image

蜱虫在羔羊嗜吞噬细胞无原体感染进展中的作用
蜱传热(TBF)是绵羊中一种严重的健康状况,由嗜吞噬细胞无原体感染引起。当TBF发生继发性细菌感染时,它可发展为蜱脓毒血症,这是一种在鸡群中引起严重发病率和死亡率的疾病。蜱虫脓毒症严重影响的机制尚不完全清楚。在这里,我们假设在确定的嗜吞噬胞芽胞杆菌菌血症期间蜱叮咬可能加重免疫抑制,增加继发感染的风险。在这项研究中,四组4只羔羊根据它们的临床和血液学结果进行比较。A组患者于第0天静脉注射嗜吞噬细胞芽胞杆菌。AT组在第0天接受相同的注射,第4天在背上放置蜱虫。T组只在第4天放置蜱虫,C组不进行任何处理。在28天内对动物进行临床和血液学评估,并分析进食后从其背部收集的蜱虫。在临床和血液学方面,与A组相比,AT组没有发现额外的有害影响。T组的所有羔羊也出现了TBF,但它们的临床和血液学结果比A组和AT组轻。血清学上,所有动物的反应相似,对应于接触嗜吞噬单胞菌的日子。PCR结果显示各组之间没有显著差异,尽管随访时间可能会影响结果,因为只有AT组羔羊在最后测试日仍保持PCR阳性。当将以AT组羔羊为食的蜱虫与以T组羔羊为食的蜱虫或从同一块地里收获的未充血的蜱虫进行比较时,很明显,绵羊在接触受感染的蜱虫后不久就成为了蜱虫中嗜吞噬细胞芽胞杆菌的放大宿主。在未充血的蜱中,10.2%的蜱感染了嗜吞噬细胞绦虫,而T组和AT组的感染率分别为67%和99.2%。与嗜吞噬细胞蜱相比,绵羊是伯氏疏螺旋体的难治性宿主,在T组和AT组中,未充血的蜱中感染伯氏疏螺旋体的比例分别为10.2%和1.7%。在这项研究中,在确定的嗜吞噬胞杆菌菌血症期间,额外的蜱叮咬不会导致羔羊的免疫抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials. The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信