Role of tick infestation in the progression of Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in lambs

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
M. Groenevelt , S.R. Wijburg , H. Sprong , K. Kerkhof , S. Stuen
{"title":"Role of tick infestation in the progression of Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in lambs","authors":"M. Groenevelt ,&nbsp;S.R. Wijburg ,&nbsp;H. Sprong ,&nbsp;K. Kerkhof ,&nbsp;S. Stuen","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2025.102477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tick Borne Fever (TBF) is a serious health condition in sheep, caused by infection with <em>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em>. When secondary bacterial infections occur in TBF, it can progress to tick pyemia, a condition causing severe morbidity and mortality in flocks. The mechanisms that underly the severe effects of tick pyemia are not fully understood. Here, we hypothesized that tick bites during an established <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> bacteremia could aggravate immunosuppression, increasing the risk of secondary infections. In this study, four groups of four lambs were compared based on their clinical and hematological outcomes. Group A received an intravenous injection of <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> on day 0. Group AT received the same injection on day 0, followed by tick placement on their backs on day 4. Group T was exposed only to tick placement on day 4, while Group C received no treatment. The animals were clinically and hematologically assessed over 28 days, and ticks collected off their backs after feeding were analyzed. Both clinically and hematologically, no additional detrimental effects were seen in Group AT compared to Group A. All lambs in Group T also developed TBF, but their clinical and hematological outcomes were less severe than those in Groups A and AT. Serologically, all animals responded similarly, corresponding to the day of exposure to <em>A. phagocytophilum</em>. PCR results showed no significant differences among groups, although duration of follow-up may have influenced the results, as only Group AT lambs remained PCR positive on the final testing day. When ticks that fed on Group AT lambs were compared to either ticks fed on Group T lambs or unengorged ticks harvested from the same fields, it became clear that sheep act as amplifier hosts for <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> in ticks shortly after exposure to infected ticks<em>.</em> Among the unengorged ticks, 10.2 % were infected with <em>A. phagocytophilum</em>, compared to 67 % and 99.2 % of the engorged ticks from Groups T and AT, respectively. In contrast to <em>A. phagocytophilum</em>, sheep were refractory hosts for <em>Borrelia burgdorferi</em> s.l., as the percentage of infected ticks was 10.2 % in the unengorged ticks and only 1 and 1.7 % in engorged ticks from groups T and AT, respectively. In this study, additional tick bites did not contribute to immunosuppression in lambs during an established <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> bacteremia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"16 3","pages":"Article 102477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X2500041X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tick Borne Fever (TBF) is a serious health condition in sheep, caused by infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum. When secondary bacterial infections occur in TBF, it can progress to tick pyemia, a condition causing severe morbidity and mortality in flocks. The mechanisms that underly the severe effects of tick pyemia are not fully understood. Here, we hypothesized that tick bites during an established A. phagocytophilum bacteremia could aggravate immunosuppression, increasing the risk of secondary infections. In this study, four groups of four lambs were compared based on their clinical and hematological outcomes. Group A received an intravenous injection of A. phagocytophilum on day 0. Group AT received the same injection on day 0, followed by tick placement on their backs on day 4. Group T was exposed only to tick placement on day 4, while Group C received no treatment. The animals were clinically and hematologically assessed over 28 days, and ticks collected off their backs after feeding were analyzed. Both clinically and hematologically, no additional detrimental effects were seen in Group AT compared to Group A. All lambs in Group T also developed TBF, but their clinical and hematological outcomes were less severe than those in Groups A and AT. Serologically, all animals responded similarly, corresponding to the day of exposure to A. phagocytophilum. PCR results showed no significant differences among groups, although duration of follow-up may have influenced the results, as only Group AT lambs remained PCR positive on the final testing day. When ticks that fed on Group AT lambs were compared to either ticks fed on Group T lambs or unengorged ticks harvested from the same fields, it became clear that sheep act as amplifier hosts for A. phagocytophilum in ticks shortly after exposure to infected ticks. Among the unengorged ticks, 10.2 % were infected with A. phagocytophilum, compared to 67 % and 99.2 % of the engorged ticks from Groups T and AT, respectively. In contrast to A. phagocytophilum, sheep were refractory hosts for Borrelia burgdorferi s.l., as the percentage of infected ticks was 10.2 % in the unengorged ticks and only 1 and 1.7 % in engorged ticks from groups T and AT, respectively. In this study, additional tick bites did not contribute to immunosuppression in lambs during an established A. phagocytophilum bacteremia.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials. The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信