Unveiling the effectiveness of Chat-GPT 4.0, an artificial intelligence conversational tool, for addressing common patient queries in gastrointestinal endoscopy

iGIE Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2025.01.012

Giulio Calabrese MD , Roberta Maselli MD, PhD , Marcello Maida MD , Federico Barbaro MD, PhD , Rui Morais MD , Olga Maria Nardone MD, PhD , Emanuele Sinagra MD, PhD , Roberto Di Mitri MD , Sandro Sferrazza MD

{"title":"Unveiling the effectiveness of Chat-GPT 4.0, an artificial intelligence conversational tool, for addressing common patient queries in gastrointestinal endoscopy","authors":"Giulio Calabrese MD , Roberta Maselli MD, PhD , Marcello Maida MD , Federico Barbaro MD, PhD , Rui Morais MD , Olga Maria Nardone MD, PhD , Emanuele Sinagra MD, PhD , Roberto Di Mitri MD , Sandro Sferrazza MD","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2025.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (Chat-GPT) has proven effective in addressing patient inquiries related to gastrointestinal (GI) disease. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and reliability of Chat-GPT in answering common patients’ queries on GI endoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighteen selected patients’ queries regarding GI endoscopy were rated on a Likert-type scale by 10 health professionals and 2 non-health professionals on the following features: reliability (1-6), accuracy (1-3), and comprehensibility (1-3).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean reliability, accuracy, and comprehensibility values were 5.2 ± 1.7, 2.7 ± 0.4, and 2.9 ± 0.2, respectively. Overall, most answers were rated as having a solid level of reliability (94.4%) and accuracy (100%) and fair levels of comprehensibility (61.1%). The physicians considered the tool to be adequate for addressing questions related to clinical practice, except for inquiries regarding bowel prep solutions, medications, and pacemaker management.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Chat-GPT 4.0 demonstrated effectiveness in providing patients with informative content about GI endoscopy, even though health professional support remains essential for a comprehensive approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 21-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708625000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (Chat-GPT) has proven effective in addressing patient inquiries related to gastrointestinal (GI) disease. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and reliability of Chat-GPT in answering common patients’ queries on GI endoscopy.

Methods

Eighteen selected patients’ queries regarding GI endoscopy were rated on a Likert-type scale by 10 health professionals and 2 non-health professionals on the following features: reliability (1-6), accuracy (1-3), and comprehensibility (1-3).

Results

The mean reliability, accuracy, and comprehensibility values were 5.2 ± 1.7, 2.7 ± 0.4, and 2.9 ± 0.2, respectively. Overall, most answers were rated as having a solid level of reliability (94.4%) and accuracy (100%) and fair levels of comprehensibility (61.1%). The physicians considered the tool to be adequate for addressing questions related to clinical practice, except for inquiries regarding bowel prep solutions, medications, and pacemaker management.

Conclusions

Chat-GPT 4.0 demonstrated effectiveness in providing patients with informative content about GI endoscopy, even though health professional support remains essential for a comprehensive approach.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

iGIE

自引率

0.00%

发文量