A fracture toughness identification method for the debonding test of DCB specimens accounting for three-dimensional effects

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Gabriele Cricrì , Michele Perrella
{"title":"A fracture toughness identification method for the debonding test of DCB specimens accounting for three-dimensional effects","authors":"Gabriele Cricrì ,&nbsp;Michele Perrella","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fracture toughness of adhesive joints and laminated composites subjected to opening load is commonly evaluated using Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) specimens according to ISO or ASTM standards. The formulations of these standards are based on two-dimensional (2D) elastic beam models, although a three-dimensional (3D) effect, related to the curvature of the crack front in DCB specimens and affecting the measured fracture toughness, is present and reported in literature.</div><div>In this paper, a novel test set up is proposed to evaluate the energy release rate by revisiting a recently published decohesion model that implicitly considers the presence of 3D effects, without measuring the crack propagation length. The elastic behaviour of adherends in terms of Young’s modulus and only load and macroscopic angular displacements response are necessary.</div><div>Using the finite element code Ansys APDL, several decohesion test simulations of 3D DCB specimen models were performed. The fracture surfaces were modelled using cohesive elements and the adherends as isotropic material. The results obtained from the simulations were used to evaluate the accuracy of the fracture toughness obtained both through the active standards and via the novel approach, by comparison with that imposed in the cohesive law.</div><div>The results showed that the standardized data reduction schemes were affected by systematic errors up to 30%, whilst the proposed methodology gave a negligible error in the fracture toughness evaluation compared to that imposed in the cohesive law.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","volume":"315 ","pages":"Article 113350"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020768325001362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fracture toughness of adhesive joints and laminated composites subjected to opening load is commonly evaluated using Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) specimens according to ISO or ASTM standards. The formulations of these standards are based on two-dimensional (2D) elastic beam models, although a three-dimensional (3D) effect, related to the curvature of the crack front in DCB specimens and affecting the measured fracture toughness, is present and reported in literature.
In this paper, a novel test set up is proposed to evaluate the energy release rate by revisiting a recently published decohesion model that implicitly considers the presence of 3D effects, without measuring the crack propagation length. The elastic behaviour of adherends in terms of Young’s modulus and only load and macroscopic angular displacements response are necessary.
Using the finite element code Ansys APDL, several decohesion test simulations of 3D DCB specimen models were performed. The fracture surfaces were modelled using cohesive elements and the adherends as isotropic material. The results obtained from the simulations were used to evaluate the accuracy of the fracture toughness obtained both through the active standards and via the novel approach, by comparison with that imposed in the cohesive law.
The results showed that the standardized data reduction schemes were affected by systematic errors up to 30%, whilst the proposed methodology gave a negligible error in the fracture toughness evaluation compared to that imposed in the cohesive law.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
405
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Solids and Structures has as its objective the publication and dissemination of original research in Mechanics of Solids and Structures as a field of Applied Science and Engineering. It fosters thus the exchange of ideas among workers in different parts of the world and also among workers who emphasize different aspects of the foundations and applications of the field. Standing as it does at the cross-roads of Materials Science, Life Sciences, Mathematics, Physics and Engineering Design, the Mechanics of Solids and Structures is experiencing considerable growth as a result of recent technological advances. The Journal, by providing an international medium of communication, is encouraging this growth and is encompassing all aspects of the field from the more classical problems of structural analysis to mechanics of solids continually interacting with other media and including fracture, flow, wave propagation, heat transfer, thermal effects in solids, optimum design methods, model analysis, structural topology and numerical techniques. Interest extends to both inorganic and organic solids and structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信