Juan Antonio Duro , Noemí Ramirez , Hanspeter Wieland , Dominik Wiedenhofer , Helmut Haberl
{"title":"Global inequalities in countries' demand for raw materials: Twenty years of expansion and insufficient convergence","authors":"Juan Antonio Duro , Noemí Ramirez , Hanspeter Wieland , Dominik Wiedenhofer , Helmut Haberl","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding global patterns of resource use and their underlying drivers is crucial for environmental sustainability. Because production and consumption are globally highly interconnected, dynamic, and unequally distributed, examinations of changes in cross-country differences in resource use can shed light on questions of development, equity, and responsibility for environmental pressures.</div><div>We here examine changes in the worldwide inequality of countries' per-capita material footprint (MF<sub>pc</sub>) over the last 20 years from 2000 to 2019, using inequality measures that enable us to apply novel decomposition techniques of their driving factors. The MF accounts for the raw material extraction occurring anywhere on the planet to provide each country's population with goods and services consumed per year, thereby accounting for raw materials “embodied” in traded goods and services. Data for 146 countries from 2000 to 2019 is sourced from the multi-regional input-output database GLORIA. Using established inequality indices (Gini, Theil), we find that inequalities decreased until 2010, after which they remained relatively stable. This latter decade was characterized by a steep increase in overall global resource use. We also find that improvements in resource efficiency have not been sufficient to counter-balance increases in GDP.</div><div>Our results suggest that the last twenty years – in particular, the last decade – can be described as an “expansion and insufficient convergence” trajectory which falls short from the “Contraction and Convergence scenario” envisaged in strategies towards the Sustainable Development Goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 108600"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding global patterns of resource use and their underlying drivers is crucial for environmental sustainability. Because production and consumption are globally highly interconnected, dynamic, and unequally distributed, examinations of changes in cross-country differences in resource use can shed light on questions of development, equity, and responsibility for environmental pressures.
We here examine changes in the worldwide inequality of countries' per-capita material footprint (MFpc) over the last 20 years from 2000 to 2019, using inequality measures that enable us to apply novel decomposition techniques of their driving factors. The MF accounts for the raw material extraction occurring anywhere on the planet to provide each country's population with goods and services consumed per year, thereby accounting for raw materials “embodied” in traded goods and services. Data for 146 countries from 2000 to 2019 is sourced from the multi-regional input-output database GLORIA. Using established inequality indices (Gini, Theil), we find that inequalities decreased until 2010, after which they remained relatively stable. This latter decade was characterized by a steep increase in overall global resource use. We also find that improvements in resource efficiency have not been sufficient to counter-balance increases in GDP.
Our results suggest that the last twenty years – in particular, the last decade – can be described as an “expansion and insufficient convergence” trajectory which falls short from the “Contraction and Convergence scenario” envisaged in strategies towards the Sustainable Development Goals.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.