Context matters: Geographic and age differences explain high heterogeneity in social isolation

IF 2.4 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Fyzeen Ahmad , Adhvaith Sridhar , Steve Hoover , Carrie Henning-Smith
{"title":"Context matters: Geographic and age differences explain high heterogeneity in social isolation","authors":"Fyzeen Ahmad ,&nbsp;Adhvaith Sridhar ,&nbsp;Steve Hoover ,&nbsp;Carrie Henning-Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.wss.2025.100257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many studies have examined social and health-related factors associated with social isolation. However, the degree to which contextual factors and social determinants such as geography, age, and race compare against health-related factors in explaining heterogeneity in population-level social isolation is not well understood. To address this gap, we analyzed data from the largest-known dataset on social isolation (<em>n</em> = 73,737) from adults in central Minnesota. Linear mixed effect modeling showed that ZIP code and age significantly explain variance in isolation levels among respondents, even after controlling for individual-level factors like health. Regions with lower median incomes or higher population densities were associated with increased levels of isolation. Disparities in levels of social isolation by race and sexual orientation were also present. We conclude that social contexts may modulate the way individuals interact with others and thus modulate the prevalence of social isolation. Therefore, interventions supporting social connections must be inclusive, intersectional, and malleable to the unique communities they are built for.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52616,"journal":{"name":"Wellbeing Space and Society","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellbeing Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558125000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many studies have examined social and health-related factors associated with social isolation. However, the degree to which contextual factors and social determinants such as geography, age, and race compare against health-related factors in explaining heterogeneity in population-level social isolation is not well understood. To address this gap, we analyzed data from the largest-known dataset on social isolation (n = 73,737) from adults in central Minnesota. Linear mixed effect modeling showed that ZIP code and age significantly explain variance in isolation levels among respondents, even after controlling for individual-level factors like health. Regions with lower median incomes or higher population densities were associated with increased levels of isolation. Disparities in levels of social isolation by race and sexual orientation were also present. We conclude that social contexts may modulate the way individuals interact with others and thus modulate the prevalence of social isolation. Therefore, interventions supporting social connections must be inclusive, intersectional, and malleable to the unique communities they are built for.
许多研究都探讨了与社会隔离相关的社会和健康因素。然而,在解释人口层面社会隔离的异质性时,环境因素和社会决定因素(如地理、年龄和种族)与健康相关因素的比较程度还不是很清楚。为了填补这一空白,我们分析了明尼苏达州中部已知最大的社会隔离数据集(n = 73737)中的数据。线性混合效应模型显示,即使在控制了健康等个人层面的因素后,邮政编码和年龄仍能显著解释受访者之间的隔离水平差异。收入中位数较低或人口密度较高的地区与孤立程度增加有关。种族和性取向在社会隔离水平上也存在差异。我们的结论是,社会环境可能会调节个人与他人互动的方式,从而调节社会隔离的发生率。因此,支持社会联系的干预措施必须具有包容性、交叉性,并能适应其所针对的独特社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellbeing Space and Society
Wellbeing Space and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
124 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信