Mehdi Foroughi , Matin Bagherpour , Frank Eliassen , Rahmatallah Poudineh
{"title":"Autonomy as empowerment: A taxonomic framework for analyzing energy autonomy in local flexibility markets","authors":"Mehdi Foroughi , Matin Bagherpour , Frank Eliassen , Rahmatallah Poudineh","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Decentralized energy management in energy systems has led to the rise of the Local Flexibility Market (LFM). This market enables active prosumer participation at local levels, facilitating distributed flexibility resources and grid optimization. At its core, the LFM’s fundamental value resides in enabling energy autonomy, enabling prosumers to actively manage and exchange their flexibile resources. However, the concept of energy autonomy remains rooted in outdated notions of passive consumption and self-sufficiency. This traditional understanding hinders the full potential of these developments. Therefore, modern energy systems face a fundamental challenge: an outdated understanding of autonomy. The lack of a standardized contemporary definition of energy autonomy impedes effective comparison, selection, and regulation of autonomous solutions. To address this challenge, this paper develops a comprehensive framework with two key elements: a redefinition of energy autonomy and a multidimensional taxonomy for standardization. The focus is on the LFM, as this market leads the way in local energy trading and prosumer engagement. The framework serves as a tool to examine four key areas: communication, control, physical infrastructure, and learning. Through novel terminology and tailored metrics, it provides the structure to evaluate autonomy across market structures while accounting for their varying complexity and participant interactions. The framework was validated through an analysis of four leading LFM projects. This evaluation identified four key barriers to market development. First, regulatory frameworks suffer from ambiguous language. Second, current investment priorities remain narrowly focused. Third, automated systems lack sufficient explainability. Fourth, market access continues to limit aggregator participation. Accordingly, this work’s contribution is a transformative understanding of modern energy autonomy paradigms. These insights support decision-making in policy development, market design, and regulatory framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"389 ","pages":"Article 125777"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925005070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Decentralized energy management in energy systems has led to the rise of the Local Flexibility Market (LFM). This market enables active prosumer participation at local levels, facilitating distributed flexibility resources and grid optimization. At its core, the LFM’s fundamental value resides in enabling energy autonomy, enabling prosumers to actively manage and exchange their flexibile resources. However, the concept of energy autonomy remains rooted in outdated notions of passive consumption and self-sufficiency. This traditional understanding hinders the full potential of these developments. Therefore, modern energy systems face a fundamental challenge: an outdated understanding of autonomy. The lack of a standardized contemporary definition of energy autonomy impedes effective comparison, selection, and regulation of autonomous solutions. To address this challenge, this paper develops a comprehensive framework with two key elements: a redefinition of energy autonomy and a multidimensional taxonomy for standardization. The focus is on the LFM, as this market leads the way in local energy trading and prosumer engagement. The framework serves as a tool to examine four key areas: communication, control, physical infrastructure, and learning. Through novel terminology and tailored metrics, it provides the structure to evaluate autonomy across market structures while accounting for their varying complexity and participant interactions. The framework was validated through an analysis of four leading LFM projects. This evaluation identified four key barriers to market development. First, regulatory frameworks suffer from ambiguous language. Second, current investment priorities remain narrowly focused. Third, automated systems lack sufficient explainability. Fourth, market access continues to limit aggregator participation. Accordingly, this work’s contribution is a transformative understanding of modern energy autonomy paradigms. These insights support decision-making in policy development, market design, and regulatory framework.
期刊介绍:
Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.