Impact of investment subsidy allocation schemes on levelized costs of renewable electricity-water systems in rural West Africa

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs , Holger Schlör , Boubacar Ibrahim , Florian Siekmann , Sandra Venghaus
{"title":"Impact of investment subsidy allocation schemes on levelized costs of renewable electricity-water systems in rural West Africa","authors":"Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs ,&nbsp;Holger Schlör ,&nbsp;Boubacar Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Florian Siekmann ,&nbsp;Sandra Venghaus","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Access to electricity and drinking water are among the main obstacles in rural West Africa. They could be mitigated by implementing PV systems with battery storage and electrical water pumping systems. To assess the impacts of electricity supply in Dar Es-Salam village, a rural West African community, the economics of a PV system with battery storage and electrical water pumping are scrutinized. These systems will facilitate electricity and water access and provide the village with uninterrupted supply. Within the rural context, electricity can be used for direct residential consumption and to operate an electric water pumping system to supply clean drinking water to the households, making it an integrated, linearly linked PV/battery and water pumping system. As access to financial resources illustrates another constraint, especially in the context of West Africa and the Sahel region, the paper further assesses impacts of an investment costs subsidy on the economics of electricity and water. By examining different allocation schemes of a constrained investment costs subsidy, the paper estimates their impact on the Levelized Costs of Electricity and Water, compares these results with the current state costs reported by local villagers, and identifies a superior subsidy allocation scheme. In our case, allocating the investment costs subsidy to the PV/battery system is identified as the superior allocation scheme. This is due to the high upfront PV/battery costs in relation to the water system but also reflects the villagers’ preferences as to electricity and water costs. Based on the case data for Dar Es-Salam village, the Levelized Cost of Electricity and of Water, respectively, resulted to 0.210€/kWh and 0.520 €/m<sup>3</sup>, without subsidy. A subsidy of approximately 2/3 of the total investment costs and allocating the subsidy to the PV/battery system offers to drastically reduce the Levelized Costs for Electricity and Water to 0.045€/kWh and 0.306 €/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100411"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277242712500052X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to electricity and drinking water are among the main obstacles in rural West Africa. They could be mitigated by implementing PV systems with battery storage and electrical water pumping systems. To assess the impacts of electricity supply in Dar Es-Salam village, a rural West African community, the economics of a PV system with battery storage and electrical water pumping are scrutinized. These systems will facilitate electricity and water access and provide the village with uninterrupted supply. Within the rural context, electricity can be used for direct residential consumption and to operate an electric water pumping system to supply clean drinking water to the households, making it an integrated, linearly linked PV/battery and water pumping system. As access to financial resources illustrates another constraint, especially in the context of West Africa and the Sahel region, the paper further assesses impacts of an investment costs subsidy on the economics of electricity and water. By examining different allocation schemes of a constrained investment costs subsidy, the paper estimates their impact on the Levelized Costs of Electricity and Water, compares these results with the current state costs reported by local villagers, and identifies a superior subsidy allocation scheme. In our case, allocating the investment costs subsidy to the PV/battery system is identified as the superior allocation scheme. This is due to the high upfront PV/battery costs in relation to the water system but also reflects the villagers’ preferences as to electricity and water costs. Based on the case data for Dar Es-Salam village, the Levelized Cost of Electricity and of Water, respectively, resulted to 0.210€/kWh and 0.520 €/m3, without subsidy. A subsidy of approximately 2/3 of the total investment costs and allocating the subsidy to the PV/battery system offers to drastically reduce the Levelized Costs for Electricity and Water to 0.045€/kWh and 0.306 €/m3, respectively.
投资补贴分配方案对西非农村可再生水电系统平准化成本的影响
在西非农村,获得电力和饮用水是主要障碍之一。可以通过将光伏系统与电池存储和电动水泵系统结合使用来缓解这些问题。为了评估西非农村社区达累斯萨拉姆村电力供应的影响,我们仔细研究了带有电池储存和电动抽水的光伏系统的经济性。这些系统将促进电力和水的获取,并为该村提供不间断的供应。在农村地区,电力可直接用于住宅消费,并可运行一个电力抽水系统,向家庭提供清洁饮用水,使其成为一个综合的、线性连接的光伏/电池和抽水系统。由于获得财政资源说明了另一个制约因素,特别是在西非和萨赫勒地区,本文进一步评估了投资成本补贴对水电经济的影响。本文通过考察有限投资成本补贴的不同分配方案,估计了它们对水电平准化成本的影响,并将这些结果与当地村民报告的当前国家成本进行了比较,确定了更优的补贴分配方案。在本例中,将投资成本补贴分配给光伏/电池系统被认为是最优分配方案。这是由于与供水系统相关的前期光伏/电池成本较高,但也反映了村民对水电成本的偏好。根据达累斯萨拉姆村的案例数据,在没有补贴的情况下,电力和水的平化成本分别为0.210欧元/千瓦时和0.520欧元/立方米。约占总投资成本三分之二的补贴,并将补贴分配给光伏/电池系统,将大幅降低电力和水的平均成本,分别降至0.045欧元/千瓦时和0.306欧元/立方米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信