Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein and protein gene product 9.5 for predicting neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patients with cortical response to somatosensory evoked potentials

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chenchen Hang , Rui Shao , Xingsheng Wang, Luying Zhang, Weijie Cheng, Zihao Jiang, Ziqi Zhong, Le An, Ziren Tang
{"title":"Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein and protein gene product 9.5 for predicting neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patients with cortical response to somatosensory evoked potentials","authors":"Chenchen Hang ,&nbsp;Rui Shao ,&nbsp;Xingsheng Wang,&nbsp;Luying Zhang,&nbsp;Weijie Cheng,&nbsp;Zihao Jiang,&nbsp;Ziqi Zhong,&nbsp;Le An,&nbsp;Ziren Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Predicting neurological prognosis after cardiac arrest remains challenging. Somatosensory evoked potential N20 absence is highly specific but lacks sensitivity. Glial fibrillary acidic protein and protein gene product 9.5 are potential biomarkers for brain injury, yet their roles in cardiac arrest patients with preserved somatosensory evoked potential N20 remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From January 2023 to December 2024, 69 cardiac arrest patients were enrolled, of whom 46 had preserved somatosensory evoked potential N20 responses. Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein, protein gene product 9.5 and neuron-specific enolase levels were measured at 72 h post-resuscitation. Patients were evaluated for neurological outcomes at 3 months using the Glasgow-Pittsburgh Classification of Cerebral Function scale. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined biomarker thresholds for poor prognosis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In patients with preserved somatosensory evoked potential N20 responses, glial fibrillary acidic protein and protein gene product 9.5 levels were significantly higher in those with poor outcomes (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Glial fibrillary acidic protein (area under the curve = 0.908) had an optimal cutoff of 64.1 pg/mL (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 82.4%) and a 100% specificity threshold of 149 pg/mL. Protein gene product 9.5 (area under the curve = 0.864) had an optimal cutoff of 448.4 pg/mL (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 70.6%) and a 100% specificity threshold of 1253 pg/mL. The prognostic significance of combining serum glial fibrillary acidic protein, protein gene product 9.5, or neuron-specific enolase levels was explored, with glial fibrillary acidic protein + neuron-specific enolase achieving the highest area under the curve of 0.949 (0.882–1.000).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein and protein gene product 9.5 could be valuable predictors of poor neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patients with cortical response to somatosensory evoked potential, though further studies are required to validate these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100931"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Predicting neurological prognosis after cardiac arrest remains challenging. Somatosensory evoked potential N20 absence is highly specific but lacks sensitivity. Glial fibrillary acidic protein and protein gene product 9.5 are potential biomarkers for brain injury, yet their roles in cardiac arrest patients with preserved somatosensory evoked potential N20 remain underexplored.

Methods

From January 2023 to December 2024, 69 cardiac arrest patients were enrolled, of whom 46 had preserved somatosensory evoked potential N20 responses. Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein, protein gene product 9.5 and neuron-specific enolase levels were measured at 72 h post-resuscitation. Patients were evaluated for neurological outcomes at 3 months using the Glasgow-Pittsburgh Classification of Cerebral Function scale. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined biomarker thresholds for poor prognosis.

Results

In patients with preserved somatosensory evoked potential N20 responses, glial fibrillary acidic protein and protein gene product 9.5 levels were significantly higher in those with poor outcomes (P < 0.001). Glial fibrillary acidic protein (area under the curve = 0.908) had an optimal cutoff of 64.1 pg/mL (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 82.4%) and a 100% specificity threshold of 149 pg/mL. Protein gene product 9.5 (area under the curve = 0.864) had an optimal cutoff of 448.4 pg/mL (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 70.6%) and a 100% specificity threshold of 1253 pg/mL. The prognostic significance of combining serum glial fibrillary acidic protein, protein gene product 9.5, or neuron-specific enolase levels was explored, with glial fibrillary acidic protein + neuron-specific enolase achieving the highest area under the curve of 0.949 (0.882–1.000).

Conclusions

Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein and protein gene product 9.5 could be valuable predictors of poor neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patients with cortical response to somatosensory evoked potential, though further studies are required to validate these findings.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信