Knowledge is power? Information, partisan cleavages, and support for energy infrastructure

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Cory L. Struthers , Min-kyeong Cha , Marilyn A. Brown
{"title":"Knowledge is power? Information, partisan cleavages, and support for energy infrastructure","authors":"Cory L. Struthers ,&nbsp;Min-kyeong Cha ,&nbsp;Marilyn A. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Partisanship and ideology, environmental attitudes, government trust, and related beliefs and values can influence public opinion on clean energy and climate change. Few studies have examined how factual information about the energy sector relates to public support for different types of energy infrastructure. Using an original survey of 1,342 residents of the U.S. state of Georgia, regression analysis, and a survey experiment, we test whether energy knowledge is associated with support for renewable and fossil fuel energy infrastructure, and if political identities moderate this relationship. We find that respondents with more factual information about energy are more likely to support solar panels, wind farms, transmission lines, and energy efficient technologies—key building blocks of the clean energy transition. Conversely, we observe a partisan wedge in energy knowledge for two fossil fuels: Greater energy knowledge corresponds with opposition to coal plants only among Democrats and support for natural gas only among Republicans. The information treatment in the survey experiment has no effect, suggesting that factual information alone may not change opinion. Altogether, our research shows that knowledge corresponds with greater support for renewable and efficient energy technologies but that politics and values may compete with facts in shaping views, particularly on fossil fuel infrastructure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103976"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500057X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Partisanship and ideology, environmental attitudes, government trust, and related beliefs and values can influence public opinion on clean energy and climate change. Few studies have examined how factual information about the energy sector relates to public support for different types of energy infrastructure. Using an original survey of 1,342 residents of the U.S. state of Georgia, regression analysis, and a survey experiment, we test whether energy knowledge is associated with support for renewable and fossil fuel energy infrastructure, and if political identities moderate this relationship. We find that respondents with more factual information about energy are more likely to support solar panels, wind farms, transmission lines, and energy efficient technologies—key building blocks of the clean energy transition. Conversely, we observe a partisan wedge in energy knowledge for two fossil fuels: Greater energy knowledge corresponds with opposition to coal plants only among Democrats and support for natural gas only among Republicans. The information treatment in the survey experiment has no effect, suggesting that factual information alone may not change opinion. Altogether, our research shows that knowledge corresponds with greater support for renewable and efficient energy technologies but that politics and values may compete with facts in shaping views, particularly on fossil fuel infrastructure.
知识就是力量?信息,党派分歧,以及对能源基础设施的支持
党派和意识形态、环境态度、政府信任以及相关的信仰和价值观可以影响公众对清洁能源和气候变化的看法。很少有研究审查有关能源部门的事实信息与公众对不同类型能源基础设施的支持之间的关系。通过对美国佐治亚州1,342名居民的原始调查、回归分析和调查实验,我们测试了能源知识是否与对可再生能源和化石燃料能源基础设施的支持有关,以及政治身份是否调节了这种关系。我们发现,拥有更多关于能源的实际信息的受访者更有可能支持太阳能电池板、风力发电场、输电线路和节能技术——清洁能源转型的关键组成部分。相反,我们观察到两种化石燃料的能源知识存在党派分歧:更多的能源知识只对应于民主党人反对燃煤电厂,只对应于共和党人支持天然气。调查实验中的信息处理没有效果,说明事实信息本身并不会改变观点。总的来说,我们的研究表明,知识与对可再生能源和高效能源技术的更大支持相对应,但政治和价值观可能在形成观点方面与事实相竞争,尤其是在化石燃料基础设施方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信