County-level source-sink balance and carbon allocation of regional peak emissions: Model construction and application

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Bianshiyu Tao , Fengping Wu , Jigan Wang , Mingming Zhu , Jie Zhang , Zhencheng Xing
{"title":"County-level source-sink balance and carbon allocation of regional peak emissions: Model construction and application","authors":"Bianshiyu Tao ,&nbsp;Fengping Wu ,&nbsp;Jigan Wang ,&nbsp;Mingming Zhu ,&nbsp;Jie Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhencheng Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A fair and precise carbon allocation mechanism is crucial for enabling sub-regions to reduce emissions responsibly and equitably, thereby supporting regional carbon peaking targets. This study integrates both cumulative carbon sources and sinks to analyze the spatial and temporal dynamics of carbon balance, project regional carbon peaking pathways, and develop a county-level carbon allocation model based on the ’equal cumulative per capita net emissions’ principle. An empirical analysis is conducted for Jiangsu Province, one of China’s most developed and carbon-intensive regions. The findings reveal that Jiangsu’s carbon emissions far exceed its carbon sink capacity, resulting in a pronounced carbon imbalance, especially in South Jiangsu counties/districts, such as Jiangning, Changshu, Kunshan, Zhangjiagang, and Jiangyin. Projections indicate that Jiangsu’s total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions will peak at 847.6 million tons by 2030, with county-level carbon quotas ranging from –3.4 Mt in Taicang to 30.1 Mt in Shuyang. This variation underscores the necessity of implementing carbon allocation at the county level. The proposed allocation strategy considers both historical cumulative emissions and ecological sinks, ensuring equitable development by safeguarding the rights of less developed regions while protecting the interests of counties/districts with valuable ecosystems, such as Sheyang, Sihong, and Dafeng. These insights offer valuable guidance for policymakers in designing equitable carbon allocation strategies and integrate them with carbon trading markets to achieve cost-effective emissions reduction and support regional carbon peaking goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113387"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A fair and precise carbon allocation mechanism is crucial for enabling sub-regions to reduce emissions responsibly and equitably, thereby supporting regional carbon peaking targets. This study integrates both cumulative carbon sources and sinks to analyze the spatial and temporal dynamics of carbon balance, project regional carbon peaking pathways, and develop a county-level carbon allocation model based on the ’equal cumulative per capita net emissions’ principle. An empirical analysis is conducted for Jiangsu Province, one of China’s most developed and carbon-intensive regions. The findings reveal that Jiangsu’s carbon emissions far exceed its carbon sink capacity, resulting in a pronounced carbon imbalance, especially in South Jiangsu counties/districts, such as Jiangning, Changshu, Kunshan, Zhangjiagang, and Jiangyin. Projections indicate that Jiangsu’s total CO2 emissions will peak at 847.6 million tons by 2030, with county-level carbon quotas ranging from –3.4 Mt in Taicang to 30.1 Mt in Shuyang. This variation underscores the necessity of implementing carbon allocation at the county level. The proposed allocation strategy considers both historical cumulative emissions and ecological sinks, ensuring equitable development by safeguarding the rights of less developed regions while protecting the interests of counties/districts with valuable ecosystems, such as Sheyang, Sihong, and Dafeng. These insights offer valuable guidance for policymakers in designing equitable carbon allocation strategies and integrate them with carbon trading markets to achieve cost-effective emissions reduction and support regional carbon peaking goals.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信