Peng Zhang , Xukan Xu , Wentong Yang , Yiming Li , Shengqi Yao
{"title":"Supply-Demand risk assessment of urban flood resilience from the perspective of the ecosystem services: A case study in Nanjing, China","authors":"Peng Zhang , Xukan Xu , Wentong Yang , Yiming Li , Shengqi Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban flooding has become a pressing challenge for many countries and regions. Meanwhile, ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction approaches have been recognized as a sustainable and effective strategy for managing flood risks. This study designed a conceptual framework for assessing the supply–demand risk of urban flood resilience (UFR) from the perspective of ecosystem services (ESs). Taking the city of Nanjing, China, as an example, the InVEST model and the multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation method were employed to quantify the supply of UFR provided by natural ecosystems and the demand for UFR from socio-economic systems. Additionally, based on UFR supply–demand evaluation indicators calculated for each subdistrict, the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) was used to cluster the subdistricts. Finally, UFR supply–demand matching was conducted on the subdistrict clusters, and different flood-risk levels were identified based on the supply–demand ratio. The results showed that high flood-risk subdistricts are mainly concentrated in central urban area, low flood-risk subdistricts are primarily in urban periphery, and subdistricts in urban–rural transitional zones exhibit medium flood risk. Statistical analysis revealed that this zonal pattern is closely related to land use types and the distribution of social resources. Therefore, this study provides a scientific basis for developing management strategies of urban flood prevention from the perspective of ESs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113397"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urban flooding has become a pressing challenge for many countries and regions. Meanwhile, ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction approaches have been recognized as a sustainable and effective strategy for managing flood risks. This study designed a conceptual framework for assessing the supply–demand risk of urban flood resilience (UFR) from the perspective of ecosystem services (ESs). Taking the city of Nanjing, China, as an example, the InVEST model and the multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation method were employed to quantify the supply of UFR provided by natural ecosystems and the demand for UFR from socio-economic systems. Additionally, based on UFR supply–demand evaluation indicators calculated for each subdistrict, the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) was used to cluster the subdistricts. Finally, UFR supply–demand matching was conducted on the subdistrict clusters, and different flood-risk levels were identified based on the supply–demand ratio. The results showed that high flood-risk subdistricts are mainly concentrated in central urban area, low flood-risk subdistricts are primarily in urban periphery, and subdistricts in urban–rural transitional zones exhibit medium flood risk. Statistical analysis revealed that this zonal pattern is closely related to land use types and the distribution of social resources. Therefore, this study provides a scientific basis for developing management strategies of urban flood prevention from the perspective of ESs.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.