The impact of empirical superior vena cava isolation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation on outcomes in atrial fibrillation – Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Raymond Pranata, William Kamarullah, Giky Karwiky, Chaerul Achmad, Mohammad Iqbal
{"title":"The impact of empirical superior vena cava isolation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation on outcomes in atrial fibrillation – Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression","authors":"Raymond Pranata,&nbsp;William Kamarullah,&nbsp;Giky Karwiky,&nbsp;Chaerul Achmad,&nbsp;Mohammad Iqbal","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence remains high after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), with the superior vena cava (SVC) being a common source of non-pulmonary vein foci.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This <em>meta</em>-analysis aimed to synthesize the latest evidence and provide elaborate comparative analysis and <em>meta</em>-regression analysis regarding the empirical SVC isolation (eSVCi) versus no eSVCi in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted on studies comparing eSVCi to no eSVCi (PVI-only or adjunctive SVC isolation). The primary outcome was ATa recurrence, defined as AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia lasting over 30 s after a blanking period. Secondary outcomes included procedural duration, fluoroscopic duration, and complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen studies involving 2,176 patients were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 18 ± 9.6 months. ATa recurrence was significantly lower with eSVCi (OR 0.54 [95 % CI: 0.41, 0.72], p &lt; 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 40.7 %). Subgroup analysis revealed eSVCi reduced ATa recurrence in observational studies but not in RCTs, and in initial ablations but not repeat procedures. eSVCi was beneficial in both PVI-only and adjunctive SVC isolation subgroups. Meta-regression showed the benefit of eSVCi was less in patients with non-paroxysmal AF (p = 0.044) and hypertension (p = 0.012). Procedural time, fluoroscopic time, and complications were similar between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>eSVCi potentially reduce ATa recurrence compared to no eSVCi, without increasing complications or prolonging procedural times.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235290672500065X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence remains high after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), with the superior vena cava (SVC) being a common source of non-pulmonary vein foci.

Objective

This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the latest evidence and provide elaborate comparative analysis and meta-regression analysis regarding the empirical SVC isolation (eSVCi) versus no eSVCi in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted on studies comparing eSVCi to no eSVCi (PVI-only or adjunctive SVC isolation). The primary outcome was ATa recurrence, defined as AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia lasting over 30 s after a blanking period. Secondary outcomes included procedural duration, fluoroscopic duration, and complications.

Results

Thirteen studies involving 2,176 patients were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 18 ± 9.6 months. ATa recurrence was significantly lower with eSVCi (OR 0.54 [95 % CI: 0.41, 0.72], p < 0.001; I2 = 40.7 %). Subgroup analysis revealed eSVCi reduced ATa recurrence in observational studies but not in RCTs, and in initial ablations but not repeat procedures. eSVCi was beneficial in both PVI-only and adjunctive SVC isolation subgroups. Meta-regression showed the benefit of eSVCi was less in patients with non-paroxysmal AF (p = 0.044) and hypertension (p = 0.012). Procedural time, fluoroscopic time, and complications were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

eSVCi potentially reduce ATa recurrence compared to no eSVCi, without increasing complications or prolonging procedural times.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信